Patient and Stakeholder Engagement in the PCORI Pilot Projects: Description and Lessons Learned

被引:193
作者
Forsythe, Laura P. [1 ]
Ellis, Lauren E. [1 ]
Edmundson, Lauren [2 ]
Sabharwal, Raj [2 ]
Rein, Alison [2 ]
Konopka, Kristen [1 ]
Frank, Lori [1 ]
机构
[1] Patient Ctr Outcomes Res Inst, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] AcademyHealth, Washington, DC USA
关键词
patient-centered outcomes research; comparative effectiveness research (CER); patient engagement; CENTERED OUTCOMES RESEARCH; USER INVOLVEMENT; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS; CARE RESEARCH; HEALTH; COMMUNITY; CONSUMERS; PARTICIPATION; PERSPECTIVE;
D O I
10.1007/s11606-015-3450-z
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Patients and healthcare stakeholders are increasingly becoming engaged in the planning and conduct of biomedical research. However, limited research characterizes this process or its impact. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to characterize patient and stakeholder engagement in the 50 Pilot Projects funded by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI), and identify early contributions and lessons learned. DESIGN: A self-report instrument was completed by researchers between 6 and 12 months following project initiation. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-seven principal investigators or their designees (94 % response rate) participated in the study. MAIN MEASURES Self-report of types of stakeholders engaged, stages and levels of engagement, facilitators and barriers to engagement, lessons learned, and contributions from engagement were measured. KEY RESULTS: Most (83 %) reported engaging more than one stakeholder in their project. Among those, the most commonly reported groups were patients (90 %), clinicians (87 %), health system representatives (44 %), caregivers (41 %), and advocacy organizations (41 %). Stakeholders were commonly involved in topic solicitation, question development, study design, and data collection. Many projects engaged stakeholders in data analysis, results interpretation, and dissemination. Commonly reported contributions included changes to project methods, outcomes or goals; improvement of measurement tools; and interpretation of qualitative data. Investigators often identified communication and shared leadership strategies as "critically important" facilitators (53 and 44 % respectively); lack of stakeholder time was the most commonly reported challenge (46 %). Most challenges were only partially resolved. Early lessons learned included the importance of continuous and genuine partnerships, strategic selection of stakeholders, and accommodation of stakeholders' practical needs. CONCLUSIONS: PCORI Pilot Projects investigators report engaging a variety of stakeholders across many stages of research, with specific changes to their research attributed to engagement. This study identifies early lessons and barriers that should be addressed to facilitate engagement. While this research suggests potential impact of stakeholder engagement, systematic characterization and evaluation of engagement at multiple stages of research is needed to build the evidence base.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 21
页数:9
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], J COMP EFF IN PRESS
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2014, QUALTR SOFTW VERS 57
  • [3] [Anonymous], PCORI METH REP
  • [4] Involving consumers successfully in NHS research: a national survey
    Barber, Rosemary
    Boote, Jonathan D.
    Cooper, Cindy L.
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2007, 10 (04) : 380 - 391
  • [5] Evaluating the impact of service user involvement on research: a prospective case study
    Barber, Rosemary
    Beresford, Peter
    Boote, Jonathan
    Cooper, Cindy
    Faulkner, Alison
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSUMER STUDIES, 2011, 35 (06) : 609 - 615
  • [6] Boote J, 2012, J COMP EFFECT RES, V1, P409, DOI [10.2217/cer.12.46, 10.2217/CER.12.46]
  • [7] Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review
    Brett, Jo
    Staniszewska, Sophie
    Mockford, Carole
    Herron-Marx, Sandra
    Hughes, John
    Tysall, Colin
    Suleman, Rashida
    [J]. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2014, 17 (05) : 637 - 650
  • [8] Canadian Institute for Health Research (CIHR), 2015, STRAT PAT OR RES PAT
  • [9] The experiential knowledge of patients: a new resource for biomedical research?
    Caron-Flinterman, JF
    Broerse, JEW
    Bunders, JFG
    [J]. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2005, 60 (11) : 2575 - 2584
  • [10] A Systematic Review of Stakeholder Engagement in Comparative Effectiveness and Patient-Centered Outcomes Research
    Concannon, Thomas W.
    Fuster, Melissa
    Saunders, Tully
    Patel, Kamal
    Wong, John B.
    Leslie, Laurel K.
    Lau, Joseph
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2014, 29 (12) : 1692 - 1701