Supercritical carbon dioxide cycles for power generation: A review

被引:583
作者
Crespi, Francesco [1 ]
Gavagnin, Giacomo [1 ]
Sanchez, David [1 ]
Martinez, Gonzalo S. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Seville, Dept Energy Engn, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
[2] AICIA, Camino Descubrimientos S-N, Seville 41092, Spain
关键词
Supercritical; Carbon dioxide; sCO(2); Efficiency; Stand-alone; Combined cycle; CO2 BRAYTON CYCLES; THERMODYNAMIC ANALYSIS; ENERGY-CONVERSION; RANKINE CYCLES; NUCLEAR-POWER; SOLAR-ENERGY; OPTIMIZATION; SYSTEM; PERFORMANCE; REACTOR;
D O I
10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.02.048
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
Power cycles running on carbon dioxide at supercritical pressure and temperature were introduced in the late ninety-sixties but, after a warm welcome to the theoretical performance announced, they were later abandoned in favour of standard combustion gas turbines. Nevertheless, the technology was brought forward about a decade ago and has since captured significant attention from the scientific and industrial community. The number of publications has risen exponentially and there are several experimental projects under development today. The performances of these cycles have been deeply analysed in literature, proving to be theoretically competitive. This paper reviews all the works published in the topic to date. Different cycle concepts (stand-alone and in combination with other cycles using the same or different technologies), layouts, fuels, applications (power only or combined heat and power) and operating conditions are reviewed and categorised according to the configuration of the cycle. This latter feature is thought to be an interesting added value of this paper since, rather than just listing the past work in the area of sCO(2) power cycles, it also organises the numerous cycles in different categories and provides a comparison of the claimed performance of each one of them. This comparison between the performances of the various configurations is based on the values declared in the original papers and thus applies to very different boundary conditions. Obviously, this great heterogeneity of the available data (in particular the temperatures and pressures considered) makes it impossible to establish a fair comparison between the configurations reviewed. Therefore, a future study seems to be mandatory where the performances of all cycles should be compared for the same set of operating conditions. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:152 / 183
页数:32
相关论文
共 117 条
[1]   Generation-IV nuclear power: A review of the state of the science [J].
Abram, Tim ;
Ion, Sue .
ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (12) :4323-4330
[2]  
Ahn Y, T KOR NUCL SOC AUT M
[3]  
Ahn Y, ASME TURB EXP 2013 T
[4]   REVIEW OF SUPERCRITICAL CO2 POWER CYCLE TECHNOLOGY AND CURRENT STATUS OF RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT [J].
Ahn, Yoonhan ;
Bae, Seong Jun ;
Kim, Minseok ;
Cho, Seong Kuk ;
Baik, Seungjoon ;
Lee, Jeong Ik ;
Cha, Jae Eun .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY, 2015, 47 (06) :647-661
[5]   Study of various Brayton cycle designs for small modular sodium-cooled fast reactor [J].
Ahn, Yoonhan ;
Lee, Jeong Ik .
NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, 2014, 276 :128-141
[6]   Thermoeconomic analysis & optimization of the combined supercritical CO2 (carbon dioxide) recompression Brayton/organic Rankine cycle [J].
Akbari, Ata D. ;
Mahmoudi, Seyed M. S. .
ENERGY, 2014, 78 :501-512
[7]  
Allam RJ, 2013, U.S. Patent, Patent No. [8:596, 075 B2, 8596075]
[8]   CARBON DIOXIDE CONDENSATION CYCLES FOR POWER PRODUCTION [J].
ANGELINO, G .
JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING FOR POWER, 1968, 90 (03) :287-&
[9]  
ANGELINO G, ASME 1969 GAS TURB C
[10]  
[Anonymous], ASME TURB EXP 2014 T