Disputed discovery:: vivisection and experiment in the 19th century

被引:9
作者
Berkowitz, Carin [1 ]
机构
[1] Cornell Univ, ST&S Dept, Ithaca, NY 14850 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.endeavour.2006.07.001
中图分类号
N09 [自然科学史]; B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ; 010108 ; 060207 ; 060305 ; 0712 ;
摘要
In the early 19th century, physiologists Sir Charles Bell and Frangois Magendie both claimed to have been the first to identify separate motor and sensory nerve roots, a discovery acknowledged by their contemporaries as one of the most important of the age. This priority dispute came to embody distinct visions of physiology, and of the role of experimentation and vivisection within that discipline. The dispute remained unresolved, in part, because of competing definitions of what was being discovered.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 102
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] Appel Toby A., 1987, CUVIER GEOFFROY DEBA
  • [2] BELL C, 1966, IDEA NEW ANATOMY BRA
  • [3] BELL C, 1933, HAND ITS MECH VITAL
  • [4] BELL C, 1982, ENGRAVINGS BRAIN NER
  • [5] BELL C, 1825, EXPOSITION NATURAL S
  • [6] BELL C, 1870, LETT SIR C BELL KH F
  • [7] CRANEFIELD PF, 1974, HIST MED
  • [8] Cunningham Andrew., 2002, STUDIES HIST PHILOS, V33C, P631
  • [9] What is the history of science the history of? Early modern roots of the ideology of modern science
    Dear, P
    [J]. ISIS, 2005, 96 (03) : 390 - 406
  • [10] FLOURENS P, 1858, ANN REPORT SMITHSONI, P100