Opportunities drive the global distribution of protected areas

被引:67
作者
Baldi, German [1 ]
Texeira, Marcos [2 ,3 ]
Martin, Osvaldo A. [1 ]
Garu, H. Ricardo [4 ]
Jobbagy, Esteban G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl San Luis CONICET, Inst Matem tica Aplicada San Luis, San Luis, Argentina
[2] Univ Buenos Aires, Facultad Agronom, Dept Metodos Cuantitativos Sistemas Informaci n, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[3] Univ Buenos Aires CONICET, Inst Investigaciones Fisiol gicas Ecol gicas Vinc, Buenos Aires, DF, Argentina
[4] Univ Nacl Tucum n CONICET, Inst Ecolog Reg, Horco Molle, Argentina
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Protected areas; National parks; Conservation paradigms; Representativeness; Opportunity; Preferentiality; LAND-USE; BIODIVERSITY; PATTERNS; CLIMATE; IDENTIFICATION; REPRESENTATION; DIVERSITY; COVERAGE; TOURISM; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.7717/peerj.2989
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Background. Protected areas, regarded today as a cornerstone of nature conservation, result from an array of multiple motivations and opportunities. We explored at global and regional levels the current distribution of protected areas along biophysical, human, and biological gradients, and assessed to what extent protection has pursued (i) a balanced representation of biophysical environments, (ii) a set of preferred conditions (biological, spiritual, economic, or geopolitical), or (iii) existing opportunities for conservation regardless of any representation or preference criteria. Methods. We used histograms to describe the distribution of terrestrial protected areas along biophysical, human, and biological independent gradients and linear and non-linear regression and correlation analyses to describe the sign, shape, and strength of the relationships. We used a random forest analysis to rank the importance of different variables related to conservation preferences and opportunity drivers, and an evenness metric to quantify representativeness. Results. We find that protection at a global level is primarily driven by the opportunities provided by isolation and a low population density (variable importance = 34.6 and 19.9, respectively). Preferences play a secondary role, with a bias towards tourism attractiveness and proximity to international borders (variable importance = 12.7 and 3.4, respectively). Opportunities shape protection strongly in "North America & Australia - NZ'' and "Latin America & Caribbean,''while the importance of the representativeness of biophysical environments is higher in "Sub-Saharan Africa'' (1.3 times the average of other regions). Discussion. Environmental representativeness and biodiversity protection are top priorities in land conservation agendas. However, our results suggest that they have been minor players driving current protection at both global and regional levels. Attempts to increase their relevance will necessarily have to recognize the predominant opportunistic nature that the establishment of protected areas has had until present times.
引用
收藏
页数:24
相关论文
共 88 条
[51]  
Marinaro Sofía, 2012, Ecol. austral, V22, P1
[52]   Conservation opportunities across the world's anthromes [J].
Martin, Laura J. ;
Quinn, John E. ;
Ellis, Erle C. ;
Shaw, M. Rebecca ;
Dorning, Monica A. ;
Hallett, Lauren M. ;
Heller, Nicole E. ;
Hobbs, Richard J. ;
Kraft, Clifford E. ;
Law, Elizabeth ;
Michel, Nicole L. ;
Perring, Michael P. ;
Shirey, Patrick D. ;
Wiederholt, Ruscena .
DIVERSITY AND DISTRIBUTIONS, 2014, 20 (07) :745-755
[53]   Protected area downgrading, downsizing, and degazettement (PADDD) and its conservation implications [J].
Mascia, Michael B. ;
Pailler, Sharon .
CONSERVATION LETTERS, 2011, 4 (01) :9-20
[54]   Global development and the future of the protected area strategy [J].
McDonald, Robert I. ;
Boucher, Timothy M. .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2011, 144 (01) :383-392
[55]   Differences between tourism and recreation in parks [J].
McKercher, B .
ANNALS OF TOURISM RESEARCH, 1996, 23 (03) :563-575
[56]  
McNeely J. A., 1994, Protecting nature: regional reviews of protected areas., P1
[57]  
McNeely JA, 2003, 5 WORLD C PROT AR
[58]  
Mulholland G, 2002, PARKS, V12, P42
[59]   Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities [J].
Myers, N ;
Mittermeier, RA ;
Mittermeier, CG ;
da Fonseca, GAB ;
Kent, J .
NATURE, 2000, 403 (6772) :853-858
[60]   The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods [J].
Naughton-Treves, L ;
Holland, MB ;
Brandon, K .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2005, 30 :219-252