Dose-dependent modulation of the visually evoked N1/N170 by perceptual surprise: a clear demonstration of prediction-error signalling

被引:27
作者
Robinson, Jonathan E. [1 ,2 ]
Breakspear, Michael [2 ]
Young, Andrew W. [3 ]
Johnston, Patrick J. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol, Victoria Pk Rd, Kelvin Grove, Qld 4059, Australia
[2] QIMR Berghofer Med Res Inst, Herston, Qld, Australia
[3] Univ York, York, N Yorkshire, England
关键词
context trajectory; event‐ related potentials; expectancy violation; prediction error; FACE-SENSITIVE N170; MISMATCH NEGATIVITY; BRAIN; ERP; POTENTIALS; ATTENTION; RESPONSES; WORD; MMN;
D O I
10.1111/ejn.13920
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Prediction-error checking processes play a key role in predictive coding models of perception. However, neural indices of such processes have yet to be unambiguously demonstrated. To date, experimental paradigms aiming to study such phenomena have relied upon the relative frequency of stimulus repeats and/or 'unexpected' events that are physically different from 'expected' events. These features of experimental design leave open alternative explanations for the observed effects. A definitive demonstration requires that presumed prediction error-related responses should show contextual dependency (rather than simply effects of frequency or repetition) and should not be attributable to low-level stimulus differences. Most importantly, prediction-error signals should show dose dependency with respect to the degree to which expectations are violated. Here, we exploit a novel experimental paradigm specifically designed to address these issues, using it to interrogate early latency event-related potentials (ERPs) to contextually expected and unexpected visual stimuli. In two electroencephalography (EEG) experiments, we demonstrate that an N1/N170 evoked potential is robustly modulated by unexpected perceptual events ('perceptual surprise') and shows dose-dependent sensitivity with respect to both the influence of prior information and the extent to which expectations are violated. This advances our understanding of perceptual predictions in the visual domain by clearly identifying these evoked potentials as an index of visual surprise.
引用
收藏
页码:4442 / 4452
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Facilitated early cortical processing of nude human bodies
    Alho, Jussi
    Salminen, Nelli
    Sams, Mikko
    Hietanen, Jari K.
    Nummenmaa, Lauri
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 109 : 103 - 110
  • [2] CEREBRAL GENERATORS OF MISMATCH NEGATIVITY (MMN) AND ITS MAGNETIC COUNTERPART (MMNM) ELICITED BY SOUND CHANGES
    ALHO, K
    [J]. EAR AND HEARING, 1995, 16 (01) : 38 - 51
  • [3] Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans
    Bentin, S
    Allison, T
    Puce, A
    Perez, E
    McCarthy, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 8 (06) : 551 - 565
  • [4] Differences in processing violations of sequential and feature regularities as revealed by visual event-related brain potentials
    Bubic, Andreja
    Bendixen, Alexandra
    Schubotz, Ricarda I.
    Jacobsen, Thomas
    Schroeger, Erich
    [J]. BRAIN RESEARCH, 2010, 1317 : 192 - 202
  • [5] The early visual encoding of a face (N170) is viewpoint-dependent: A parametric ERP-adaptation study
    Caharel, Stephanie
    Collet, Kevin
    Rossion, Bruno
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2015, 106 : 18 - 27
  • [6] Carpenter G. A., 2003, HDB BRAIN THEORY NEU, P87, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.NEUNET.2012.09.017]
  • [7] Is the face-sensitive N170 the only ERP not affected by selective attention?
    Cauquil, AS
    Edmonds, GE
    Taylor, MJ
    [J]. NEUROREPORT, 2000, 11 (10) : 2167 - 2171
  • [8] Fixation location on upright and inverted faces modulates the N170
    de Lissa, Peter
    McArthur, Genevieve
    Hawelka, Stefan
    Palermo, Romina
    Mahajan, Yatin
    Hutzler, Florian
    [J]. NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 57 : 1 - 11
  • [9] Eimer M., 2011, OXFORD HDB FACE PERC, P329, DOI [10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199559053.013.0017, DOI 10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780199559053.013.0017]
  • [10] The free-energy principle: a unified brain theory?
    Friston, Karl J.
    [J]. NATURE REVIEWS NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 11 (02) : 127 - 138