Effect of Implant Divergence on the Accuracy of Definitive Casts Created from Traditional and Digital Implant-Level Impressions: An In Vitro Comparative Study

被引:66
作者
Lin, Wei-Shao [1 ]
Harris, Bryan T. [1 ]
Elathamna, Eiad N. [1 ]
Abdel-Azim, Tamer [1 ]
Morton, Dean [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Louisville, Sch Dent, Dept Oral Hlth & Rehabil, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
[2] Univ Louisville, Sch Dent, Adv Educ Prosthodont, Louisville, KY 40292 USA
关键词
dental implants; dental impression technique; digital impression; implant divergence; parallel confocal technology; RESTORATIONS; ANGULATION; PROSTHESES; FIT; TECHNOLOGY; FRAMEWORK; ABUTMENT;
D O I
10.11607/jomi.3592
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: The purpose of this research was to compare the accuracy of definitive casts created with digital and conventional methods for implants with internal-octagon connections placed parallel or at different angles (15, 30, or 45 degrees). Materials and Methods: Four customized epoxy resin master casts were fabricated with two-implant analogs placed in the posterior mandible with different degrees of divergence. For the conventional (control) group, 10 traditional impressions were taken on each master cast with custom trays, open-tray impression copings, and polyvinyl siloxane; definitive stone casts were poured with type IV dental stone. For the digital group, 10 digital impressions were taken on each master cast with two-piece scannable impression copings and an intraoral digital scanner; definitive milled polyurethane casts were fabricated by the manufacturer. All four master casts and 80 control and test casts were scanned and digitized, and the data sets were compared. Any deviations in measurements between the definitive and corresponding master casts were analyzed statistically. Results: The amount of divergence between implants did not affect the accuracy of the stone casts created conventionally; however, it significantly affected the accuracy of the milled casts created digitally. A decreasing linear trend in deviations for both distance and angle measurements suggested that the digital technique was more accurate when the implants diverged more. At 0 and 15 degrees of divergence, the digital method resulted in highly significantly less accurate definitive casts. At 30 and 45 degrees of divergence, however, the milled casts showed either no difference or marginal differences with casts created conventionally. Conclusion: The digital pathway produced less accurate definitive casts than the conventional pathway with the tested two-implant scenarios. To ensure passive fit of definitive prostheses, verification devices and casts may be used when materials are produced digitally.
引用
收藏
页码:102 / 109
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Abduo J, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V25, P506
  • [2] Effects of Implant Angulation, Impression Material, and Variation in Arch Curvature Width on Implant Transfer Model Accuracy
    Akalin, Zerrin Fidan
    Ozkan, Yasemin Kulak
    Ekerim, Ahmet
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (01) : 149 - 157
  • [3] AN IN VITRO COMPARISON OF THE ACCURACY OF IMPLANT IMPRESSIONS WITH CODED HEALING ABUTMENTS AND DIFFERENT IMPLANT ANGULATIONS
    Al-Abdullah, Khaled
    Zandparsa, Roya
    Finkelman, Matthew
    Hirayama, Hiroshi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2013, 110 (02) : 90 - 100
  • [4] Three-Dimensional Accuracy of Implant and Abutment Level Impression Techniques: Effect on Marginal Discrepancy
    Alikhasi, Marzieh
    Siadat, Hakimeh
    Monzavi, Abbas
    Momen-Heravi, Fatemeh
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORAL IMPLANTOLOGY, 2011, 37 (06) : 649 - 657
  • [5] Choi JH, 2007, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V22, P761
  • [6] Accuracy of two impression techniques with angulated implants
    Conrad, Heather J.
    Pesun, Igor J.
    DeLong, Ralph
    Hodges, James S.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2007, 97 (06) : 349 - 356
  • [7] The Accuracy of an Implant Impression Technique Using Digitally Coded Healing Abutments
    Eliasson, Alf
    Ortorp, Anders
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 : e30 - e38
  • [8] Comparison of the Accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and Conventional Implant Impression Techniques
    Howell, Kent J.
    McGlumphy, Edwin A.
    Drago, Carl
    Knapik, Gregory
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL & MAXILLOFACIAL IMPLANTS, 2013, 28 (01) : 228 - 240
  • [9] Digital implant impressions with the "Individualized Scanbody Technique" for emergence profile support
    Joda, Tim
    Wittneben, Julia-Gabriela
    Braegger, Urs
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2014, 25 (03) : 395 - 397
  • [10] Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit
    Kan, JYK
    Rungcharassaeng, K
    Bohsali, K
    Goodacre, CJ
    Lang, BR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1999, 81 (01) : 7 - 13