Evaluation of surgical glove integrity during surgery in a Brazilian teaching hospital

被引:17
作者
de Oliveira, Adriana Cristina [1 ]
Gama, Camila Sarmento [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Ctr Studies & Res Infect Related Hlth Care CNPq, Sch Nursing, Conselho Nacl Desenvolvimento Cient & Tecnol,Natl, BR-30130100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Minas Gerais, Ctr Studies & Res Infect Related Hlth Care CNPq, Conselho Nacl Desenvolvimento Cient & Tecnol, Natl Counsel Technol & Sci Dev, BR-30130100 Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
关键词
Surgical wound infection; Gloves; protective; Patient safety; PERFORATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2014.06.021
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: A cross-sectional study was conducted in a large university hospital in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil to evaluate surgical glove integrity after use during surgery. Methods: This 6-month study was conducted by a gastroenterological, cardiovascular, and pediatric surgical team consisting of surgeons (main surgeon and first and second assistants), medical students, and scrub nurses. The gloves used during surgery were examined postsurgery for microperforations using the watertight test as described in European Norm EN 455-1. Results: A total of 116 medical professionals conducted the 100 surgeries monitored. Of the 1090 gloves analyzed, 131 (12%) had a perforation detected postsurgery, 39 of which (37.5%) were recognized by users at the time of occurrence. The highest incidence of perforations occurred among surgeons (P = .033) in the index finger, followed by the thumb of the nondominant hand; in outer gloves (76.9%) when double-gloving was used (P = .014); in open surgery (P = .019); and in surgeries lasting >150 minutes (P < .05). Conclusion: These findings reaffirm the importance of double-gloving, using a perforation indicator system, and changing gloves in surgeries of >= 150 minutes duration, especially in procedures involving open incisions. Copyright (C) 2014 by the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1093 / 1096
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Updated Recommendations for Control of Surgical Site Infections [J].
Alexander, J. Wesley ;
Solomkin, Joseph S. ;
Edwards, Michael J. .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2011, 253 (06) :1082-1093
[2]  
[Anonymous], COGITARE ENFERM
[3]  
Association of periOperative Registered Nurses Recommended Practices Committee, 2004, AORN J, V79, P416
[4]  
European Committee for Standardization, 2000, 4551 EN
[5]   A Randomized Prospective Study of Glove Perforation in Orthopaedic Surgery: Is a Thick Glove More Effective? [J].
Han, Chang Dong ;
Kim, Jieun ;
Moon, Sung Hwan ;
Lee, Byung Ho ;
Kwon, Hyuk Min ;
Park, Kwan Kyu .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 2013, 28 (10) :1878-1881
[6]   Concentration of bacteria passing through puncture holes in surgical gloves [J].
Harnoss, Julian-Camill ;
Partecke, Lars-Ivo ;
Heidecke, Claus-Dieter ;
Huebner, Nils-Olaf ;
Kramer, Axel ;
Assadian, Ojan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2010, 38 (02) :154-158
[7]   How often does glove perforation occur in surgery? Comparison between single gloves and a double-gloving system [J].
Laine, T ;
Aarnio, P .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 181 (06) :564-566
[8]   Guideline for Prevention of Surgical Site Infection, 1999 [J].
Mangram, AJ ;
Horan, TC ;
Pearson, ML ;
Silver, LC ;
Jarvis, WR .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1999, 20 (04) :250-278
[9]   Surgical Glove Perforation and the Risk of Surgical Site Infection [J].
Misteli, Heidi ;
Weber, Walter P. ;
Reck, Stefan ;
Rosenthal, Rachel ;
Zwahlen, Marcel ;
Fueglistaler, Philipp ;
Bolli, Martin K. ;
Oertli, Daniel ;
Widmer, Andreas F. ;
Marti, Walter R. .
ARCHIVES OF SURGERY, 2009, 144 (06) :553-558
[10]  
QUEBBEMAN EJ, 1992, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V127, P213