Analyzing Collaborative Governance Through Social Network Analysis: A Case Study of River Management Along the Waal River in The Netherlands

被引:103
作者
Fliervoet, J. M. [1 ]
Geerling, G. W. [1 ,2 ]
Mostert, E. [3 ]
Smits, A. J. M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Inst Sci Innovat & Soc, Fac Sci, POB 9010, NL-6500 GL Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Deltares, POB 177, NL-2600 MH Delft, Netherlands
[3] Delft Univ Technol, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Collaboration; Flood protection; Floodplain management; Nature restoration; River management; Social network analysis; NATURAL-RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; POLICY; COMANAGEMENT; PRINCIPLES; BARRIERS;
D O I
10.1007/s00267-015-0606-x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Until recently, governmental organizations played a dominant and decisive role in natural resource management. However, an increasing number of studies indicate that this dominant role is developing towards a more facilitating role as equal partner to improve efficiency and create a leaner state. This approach is characterized by complex collaborative relationships between various actors and sectors on multiple levels. To understand this complexity in the field of environmental management, we conducted a social network analysis of floodplain management in the Dutch Rhine delta. We charted the current interorganizational relationships between 43 organizations involved in flood protection (blue network) and nature management (green network) and explored the consequences of abolishing the central actor in these networks. The discontinuation of this actor will decrease the connectedness of actors within the blue and green network and may therefore have a large impact on the exchange of ideas and decision-making processes. Furthermore, our research shows the dependence of non-governmental actors on the main governmental organizations. It seems that the Dutch governmental organizations still have a dominant and controlling role in floodplain management. This challenges the alleged shift from a dominant government towards collaborative governance and calls for detailed analysis of actual governance.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 367
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[11]   Governance without a state: Can it work? [J].
Boerzel, Tanja A. ;
Risse, Thomas .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2010, 4 (02) :113-134
[12]  
Borgatti S.P., 2018, Analyzing social networks
[13]   Network Analysis in the Social Sciences [J].
Borgatti, Stephen P. ;
Mehra, Ajay ;
Brass, Daniel J. ;
Labianca, Giuseppe .
SCIENCE, 2009, 323 (5916) :892-895
[14]   Adaptation in Collaborative Governance Regimes [J].
Emerson, Kirk ;
Gerlak, Andrea K. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2014, 54 (04) :768-781
[15]   An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance [J].
Emerson, Kirk ;
Nabatchi, Tina ;
Balogh, Stephen .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2012, 22 (01) :1-29
[16]   Governance in integrated coastal zone management: a social networks analysis of cross-scale collaboration [J].
Ernoul, Lisa ;
Wardell-Johnson, Angela .
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION, 2013, 40 (03) :231-240
[17]   Combining safety and nature: A multi-stakeholder perspective on integrated floodplain management [J].
Fliervoet, J. M. ;
Van den Born, R. J. G. ;
Smits, A. J. M. ;
Knippenberg, L. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 128 :1033-1042
[18]   Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems [J].
Folke, C ;
Hahn, T ;
Olsson, P ;
Norberg, J .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ENVIRONMENT AND RESOURCES, 2005, 30 :441-473
[19]   Centralization in the global avoided deforestation collaboration network [J].
Gallemore, Caleb ;
Munroe, Darla K. .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2013, 23 (05) :1199-1210
[20]  
Gray B., 1989, Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems