Efficiency and sustainability analysis of biogas and electricity production from a large-scale biogas project in China: an emergy evaluation based on LCA

被引:78
作者
Wang, Xiaolong [1 ]
Chen, Yuanquan [1 ]
Sui, Peng [1 ]
Gao, Wangsheng [1 ]
Qin, Feng [1 ]
Wu, Xia [1 ]
Xiong, Jing [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Coll Agron & Biotechnol, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
关键词
Emergy evaluation; Large-scale biogas project; Efficiency; Sustainability; China; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; PUBLIC-GOODS GAMES; ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEMS-ANALYSIS; PART II; COOPERATION; ENERGY; GENERATION; DEPLOYMENT; EMISSIONS; DIGESTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.09.001
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Biogas, which plays an important role in energy production and environmental protection, is developing at a large-scale in China to accommodate the modernization and fast pace that the Chinese agricultural sector has experienced over the last decade due to the rapid development of large-scale farms and stockbreeding in recent years. This study introduced life cycle assessment (LCA) into emergy evaluation to analyze each production step of a large-scale biogas project in China and to compare the economic and ecological performance of the biogas production system (BPS) and biogas plus electricity production system (BEPS) of a project. Our findings indicated that the energy return rate of biogas production system was lower than that of traditional energy production system currently. Emergy efficiency of the large-scale biogas project was 77.9-95.6% higher than that of the small-scale biogas project. The emission mitigation intensity was also 125.7-172.7 times higher for the large-scale plant than for the small-scale plant. The sustainability of the large-scale biogas project was 1.16-11.87 times higher than that of other renewable energy production systems, but 66.0-74.4% lower than that of the small-scale biogas project due to an insufficient amount of raw material inputs and the higher cost of equipment investment in anaerobic fermentation and electricity generation steps. Moreover, the economic and ecological performance of BEPS was worse than that of BPS. We suggested that the sustainability of the large-scale biogas project would be improved by measures: first, providing a suitable quantity and ratio of raw materials; second, reducing the equipment investment of fermentation and the generator; third, using the electricity from the biogas system. (C) 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 245
页数:12
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Investigation of scale economies for African biogas installations [J].
Amigun, B. ;
von Blottnitz, H. .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 2007, 48 (12) :3090-3094
[2]   The problem of co-production in environmental accounting by energy analysis [J].
Bastianoni, S ;
Marchettini, N .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2000, 129 (2-3) :187-193
[3]   Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems -: Part 1:: Fuel-cycle emissions [J].
Börjesson, P ;
Berglund, M .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (05) :469-485
[4]   Environmental systems analysis of biogas systems -: Part II:: The environmental impact of replacing various reference systems [J].
Borjesson, Pal ;
Berglund, Maria .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2007, 31 (05) :326-344
[5]  
Brandt-Williams S.L., 2002, Handbook of Emergy Evaluation: A Compendium of Data for Emergy Computation Issued in a Series of Folios
[6]   Harvesting heterogeneous renewable resources: Uncoordinated, selfish, team-, and community-oriented strategies [J].
Brede, M. ;
De Vries, H. J. M. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2010, 25 (01) :117-128
[7]  
Brown M.T., 2004, Encyclopedia of Energy, P329, DOI DOI 10.1016/B0-12-176480-X/00242-4
[8]   Emergy assessment of integrated production systems of grains, pig and fish in small farms in the South Brazil [J].
Cavalett, O ;
de Queiroz, JF ;
Ortega, E .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 193 (3-4) :205-224
[9]  
Chen F., 2011, Agricultural Ecology
[10]   Improving conversion of Spartina alterniflora into biogas by co-digestion with cow feces [J].
Chen, Guangyin ;
Zheng, Zheng ;
Yang, Shiguan ;
Fang, Caixia ;
Zou, Xingxing ;
Zhang, Jibiao .
FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 91 (11) :1416-1421