Benefits of water-related ecological infrastructure investments to support sustainable land-use: a review of evidence from critically water-stressed catchments in South Africa

被引:19
作者
Rebelo, Alanna J. [1 ]
Holden, Petra B. [3 ]
Esler, Karen [1 ,2 ]
New, Mark G. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Stellenbosch Univ, Dept Conservat Ecol & Entomol, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[2] Stellenbosch Univ, DSI NRF Ctr Invas Biol, Stellenbosch, South Africa
[3] Univ Cape Town, African Climate & Dev Initiat, Cape Town, South Africa
[4] Univ East Anglia, Sch Int Dev, Norwich, Norfolk, England
关键词
nature's benefits to people; ecosystem-based adaptation; nature-based solutions; sustainable land management; INVASIVE ALIEN PLANTS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; RESTORATION; BIODIVERSITY; MANAGEMENT; COSTS; AREAS;
D O I
10.1098/rsos.201402
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Investments to promote sustainable land-use within critical river catchment areas are often undertaken to provide benefits to society. Investments generally aim to protect or restore ecological infrastructure-the underlying framework of ecosystems, functions and processes that supply ecosystem services-for multiple benefits to society. However, the empirical evidence base from studies across the world on both mechanisms and outcomes to support these assumptions is limited. We collate evidence on the benefits of ecological infrastructure interventions, in terms of ecosystem services provided to society, from three major South African water-providing catchments using a novel framework. In these catchments, millions of US Dollars' worth of investments have been made into ecological infrastructure since 1996. We ask the question: is there evidence that ecological infrastructure interventions are delivering the proposed benefits? Results show that even in catchments with substantial, long-term financial investment into ecological infrastructure, research has not empirically confirmed the benefits. Better baseline data collection is required, and monitoring during and after ecological infrastructure interventions, to quantify benefits to society. This evidence is needed to leverage investment into ecological infrastructure interventions at scale. Investment at scale is needed to transition to more sustainable land-use to unlock greater benefits to nature and people.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Archer E., 2021, RFPERMUTE ESTIMATE P
[2]   CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS AND REFERENCES FOR LANDSCAPE-SCALE RESTORATION: REFLECTING BACK AND LOOKING FORWARD [J].
Aronson, James ;
Blignaut, James N. ;
Aronson, Thibaud B. .
ANNALS OF THE MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN, 2017, 102 (02) :188-200
[3]   Are ecosystem services adequately quantified? [J].
Boerema, Annelies ;
Rebelo, Alanna J. ;
Bodi, Merche B. ;
Esler, Karen J. ;
Meire, Patrick .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2017, 54 (02) :358-370
[4]   Economic evaluation of wetland restoration: a systematic review of the literature [J].
Browne, Michelle ;
Fraser, Gavin ;
Snowball, Jeanette .
RESTORATION ECOLOGY, 2018, 26 (06) :1120-1126
[5]  
Cartwright A., 2015, PUBLIC PRIVATE FINAN
[6]   Quantifying range structure to inform management in invaded landscapes [J].
Cheney, Chad ;
van Wilgen, Nicola J. ;
Esler, Karen J. ;
Foxcroft, Llewellyn C. ;
McGeoch, Melodie A. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 2021, 58 (02) :338-349
[7]  
Cohen-Shacham E., 2016, IUCN INT UNION CONSE, V97, P2016, DOI [DOI 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.EN, 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en]
[8]  
Colvin C., 2015, Green Fund Research Report
[9]   How are nature based solutions contributing to priority societal challenges surrounding human well-being in the United Kingdom: a systematic map protocol [J].
Dick, Jan ;
Miller, James D. ;
Carruthers-Jones, Jonathan ;
Dobel, Anne J. ;
Carver, Steve ;
Garbutt, Angus ;
Hester, Alison ;
Hails, Rosie ;
Magreehan, Victoria ;
Quinn, Melina .
ENVIRONMENTAL EVIDENCE, 2019, 8 (01)
[10]  
Dominati EJ, 2013, ECOSYSTEM SERVICES IN NEW ZEALAND: CONDITIONS AND TRENDS, P132