The Effect of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Size on Endoleak, Secondary Intervention and Overall Survival Following Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair

被引:8
作者
Ferrel, Benjamin [1 ]
Patel, Shiv [1 ]
Castillo, Antonio [2 ]
Gryn, Oscar [3 ]
Franko, Jan [1 ]
Chew, David [1 ]
机构
[1] MercyOne Med Ctr, Des Moines, IA USA
[2] Univ Missouri, Kansas City, MO 64110 USA
[3] Des Moines Univ, Des Moines, IA USA
关键词
abdominal aortic aneurysm repair; endovascular grafting; EVAR; endoleak; secondary intervention;
D O I
10.1177/15385744211000572
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The purpose of this study was to identify the effect of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) size on endoleak development and secondary intervention after endovascular repair (EVAR), as well as to examine the effect on overall survival and cause of mortality. Methods: Retrospective analysis was performed on all non-ruptured AAA treated by elective EVAR using FDA-approved endografts in our facility from July 2004 to December 2017. Patients were grouped into 3 cohorts based on preoperative aneurysm size: Group I (<5.5 cm), Group II (5.5-6.4 cm), and Group III (>= 6.5 cm). Occurrences of endoleak, secondary intervention and overall survival underwent univariate and multivariate analysis. Cause of death data on deceased patients was similarly examined. Results: A total of 517 patients were analyzed. There was no difference between size groups in the rate of endoleak (Group I 48/277, 17.3%; Group II 33/160, 20.6%; Group III 18/80, 22.5%; p = 0.46) or time until endoleak development. Univariate analysis showed no difference in the rate of secondary intervention (Group I 36/277, 13.0%; Group II 24/160, 15.0%; Group III 18/80, 22.5%; p = 0.11), time until intervention or number of interventions performed. Multivariate analysis showed an association with shorter time to secondary intervention for both Group III aneurysms (HR 2.03, 95% CI 1.11-3.73; p = 0.02) and female patients (HR 1.79, 95% CI 1.02-3.13; p = 0.04). There was no difference in overall survival, aneurysm-related mortality or overall cause of mortality. Conclusion: AAA diameter prior to EVAR was not associated with any differences in rates of endoleak or secondary intervention, and was not associated with poorer overall survival or greater aneurysm-related mortality. Patients with suitable anatomy for EVAR can be considered for this intervention without concern for increased complications or poorer outcomes related to large aneurysm diameter alone.
引用
收藏
页码:467 / 474
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]   Challenging Anatomy Predicts Mortality and Complications After Endovascular Treatment of Ruptured Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm [J].
Baderkhan, Hassan ;
Bastos Goncalves, Frederico M. ;
Oliveira, Nelson Gomes ;
Verhagen, Hence J. M. ;
Wanhainen, Anders ;
Bjorck, Martin ;
Mani, Kevin .
JOURNAL OF ENDOVASCULAR THERAPY, 2016, 23 (06) :919-927
[2]   Use of baseline factors to predict complications and reinterventions after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm [J].
Brown, L. C. ;
Greenhalgh, R. M. ;
Powell, J. T. ;
Thompson, S. G. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (08) :1207-1217
[3]   Role of the Inferior Mesenteric Artery in Predicting Secondary Intervention for Type II Endoleak After Endovascular Aneurysm Repair [J].
Chew, David K. ;
Schroeder, Andrew C. ;
Hsu, Harold W. ;
Dong, Siwei ;
Franko, Jan .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 68 (03) :E50-E50
[4]   Rural-Urban Differences in Cardiovascular Mortality in the US, 1999-2017 [J].
Cross, Sarah H. ;
Mehra, Mandeep R. ;
Bhatt, Deepak L. ;
Nasir, Khurram ;
O'Donnell, Christopher J. ;
Califf, Robert M. ;
Warraich, Haider J. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2020, 323 (18) :1852-1854
[5]   Comparison of endovascular aneurysm repair with open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1), 30-day operative mortality results: randomised controlled trial [J].
Greenhalgh, RM ;
Brown, LC ;
Kwong, GPS ;
Powell, JT ;
Thompson, SG .
LANCET, 2004, 364 (9437) :843-848
[6]   Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm [J].
Greenhalgh, Roger M. ;
Brown, Louise C. ;
Powell, Janet T. ;
Thompson, Simon G. ;
Epstein, David ;
Sculpher, Mark J. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (20) :1863-1871
[7]   Invasive Cancer Incidence, 2004-2013, and Deaths, 2006-2015, in Nonmetropolitan and Metropolitan Counties - United States [J].
Henley, S. Jane ;
Anderson, Robert N. ;
Thomas, Cheryll C. ;
Massetti, Greta M. ;
Peaker, Brandy ;
Richardson, Lisa C. .
MMWR SURVEILLANCE SUMMARIES, 2017, 66 (14) :1-13
[8]   Any nonadherence to instructions for use predicts graft-related adverse events in patients undergoing elective endovascular aneurysm repair [J].
Herman, Christine R. ;
Charbonneau, Philippe ;
Hongku, Kiattisak ;
Dubois, Luc ;
Hossain, Sajjid ;
Lee, Kevin ;
Steinmetz, Oren K. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2018, 67 (01) :126-132
[9]   Differences in patient selection and outcomes based on abdominal aortic aneurysm diameter thresholds in the Vascular Quality Initiative [J].
Jones, Douglas W. ;
Deery, Sarah E. ;
Schneider, Darren B. ;
Rybin, Denis V. ;
Siracuse, Jeffrey J. ;
Farber, Alik ;
Schermerhorn, Marc L. .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 70 (05) :1446-1455
[10]   Does the diameter of abdominal aortic aneurysm influence late survival following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair? A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Khashram, Manar ;
Hider, Phil N. ;
Williman, Jonathan A. ;
Jones, Gregory T. ;
Roake, Justin A. .
VASCULAR, 2016, 24 (06) :658-667