Updated Alternative Fistula Risk Score (ua-FRS) to Include Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomy Pan-European Validation

被引:137
作者
Mungroop, Timothy H. [1 ]
Klompmaker, Sjors [1 ]
Wellner, Ulrich F. [2 ,3 ]
Steyerberg, Ewout W. [4 ]
Coratti, Andrea [5 ]
D'Hondt, Mathieu [6 ]
de Pastena, Matteo [7 ]
Dokmak, Safi [8 ]
Khatov, Igor [9 ]
Saint-Marc, Olivier [10 ]
Wittel, Uwe [11 ]
Abu Hilal, Mohammed [12 ]
Fuks, David [13 ]
Poves, Ignasi [14 ]
Keck, Tobias [2 ,3 ]
Boggi, Ugo [15 ]
Besselink, Marc G. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Canc Ctr Amsterdam, Dept Surg, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, NL-1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Clin Surg, UKSH Campus Lubeck, Lubeck, Germany
[3] Deutsch Gesell Allgemein & Viszeralchirurg DGAV, Studien Dokumentat & Qualitatszentrum StuDoQ Panc, Berlin, Germany
[4] Leiden Univ, Dept Biomed Data Sci, Med Ctr, Leiden, Netherlands
[5] Careggi Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol & Robot Surg, Florence, Italy
[6] Groeninge Hosp, Dept Digest & Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg, Kortrijk, Belgium
[7] Univ Verona Hosp Trust, Pancreas Inst, Dept Surg, Verona, Italy
[8] Beaujon Hosp, Dept HPB Surg & Liver Transplantat, Clichy, France
[9] Moscow Clin Sci Ctr, Dept Surg, Moscow, Russia
[10] Ctr Hosp Reg Orleans, Dept Surg, Orleans, France
[11] Univ Freiburg, Dept Visceral & Gen Surg, Med Ctr, Freiburg, Germany
[12] Southampton Univ Hosp NHS Fdn Trust, Dept Surg, Southampton, Hants, England
[13] Univ Paris 05, Inst Mutualiste Montsouris, Dept Digest Oncol & Metab Surg, Paris, France
[14] Hosp Mar, Dept Surg, Barcelona, Spain
[15] Univ Pisa, Div Gen & Transplant Surg, Pisa, Italy
关键词
hybrid; laparoscopic; minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy; pancreas; pancreatic cancer; pancreatoduodenectomy; robot; robotic; surgery; Whipple; POSTOPERATIVE PANCREATIC FISTULA; EXTERNAL VALIDATION; LAPAROSCOPIC PANCREATICODUODENECTOMY; PREDICTION MODEL; FATTY PANCREAS; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1097/SLA.0000000000003234
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objective: The aim of the study was to validate and optimize the alternative Fistula Risk Score (a-FRS) for patients undergoing minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) in a large pan-European cohort. Background: MIPD may be associated with an increased risk of postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF). The a-FRS could allow for risk-adjusted comparisons in research and improve preventive strategies for high-risk patients. The a-FRS, however, has not yet been validated specifically for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and hybrid MIPD. Methods: A validation study was performed in a pan-European cohort of 952 consecutive patients undergoing MIPD (543 laparoscopic, 258 robot-assisted, 151 hybrid) in 26 centers from 7 countries between 2007 and 2017. The primary outcome was POPF (International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C). Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUC; discrimination) and calibration plots. Validation included univariable screening for clinical variables that could improve performance. Results: Overall, 202 of 952 patients (21%) developed POPF after MIPD. Before adjustment, the original a-FRS performed moderately (AUC 0.68) and calibration was inadequate with systematic underestimation of the POPF risk. Single-row pancreatojejunostomy (odds ratio 4.6, 95 confidence interval [CI] 2.8-7.6) and male sex (odds ratio 1.9, 95 CI 1.4-2.7) were identified as important risk factors for POPF in MIPD. The updated a-FRS, consisting of body mass index, pancreatic texture, duct size, and male sex, showed good discrimination (AUC 0.75, 95 CI 0.71-0.79) and adequate calibration. Performance was adequate for laparoscopic, robot-assisted, and hybrid MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy. Conclusions: The updated a-FRS (www.pancreascalculator.com) now includes male sex as a risk factor and is validated for both MIPD and open pancreatoduodenectomy. The increased risk of POPF in laparoscopic MIPD was associated with single-row pancreatojejunostomy, which should therefore be discouraged.
引用
收藏
页码:334 / 340
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Defining a Hospital Volume Threshold for Minimally Invasive Pancreaticoduodenectomy in the United States [J].
Adam, Mohamed Abdelgadir ;
Thomas, Samantha ;
Youngwirth, Linda ;
Pappas, Theodore ;
Roman, Sanziana A. ;
Sosa, Julie A. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2017, 152 (04) :336-342
[2]   Postoperative pancreatic fistula: An international study group (ISGPF) definition [J].
Bassi, C ;
Dervenis, C ;
Butturini, G ;
Fingerhut, A ;
Yeo, C ;
Izbicki, J ;
Neoptolemos, J ;
Sarr, M ;
Traverso, W ;
Buchler, M .
SURGERY, 2005, 138 (01) :8-13
[3]   The 2016 update of the International Study Group (ISGPS) definition and grading of postoperative pancreatic fistula: 11 Years After [J].
Bassi, Claudio ;
Marchegiani, Giovanni ;
Dervenis, Christos ;
Sarr, Micheal ;
Abu Hilal, Mohammad ;
Adham, Mustapha ;
Allen, Peter ;
Andersson, Roland ;
Asbun, Horacio J. ;
Besselink, Marc G. ;
Conlon, Kevin ;
Del Chiaro, Marco ;
Falconi, Massimo ;
Fernandez-Cruz, Laureano ;
Fernandez-Del Castillo, Carlos ;
Fingerhut, Abe ;
Friess, Helmut ;
Gouma, Dirk J. ;
Hackert, Thilo ;
Izbicki, Jakob ;
Lillemoe, Keith D. ;
Neoptolemos, John P. ;
Olah, Attila ;
Schulick, Richard ;
Shrikhande, Shailesh V. ;
Takada, Tadahiro ;
Takaori, Kyoichi ;
Traverso, William ;
Vollmer, Charles ;
Wolfgang, Christopher L. ;
Yeo, Charles J. ;
Salvia, Roberto ;
Buehler, Marcus .
SURGERY, 2017, 161 (03) :584-591
[4]   Robotic-Assisted Pancreatic Resections [J].
Boggi, Ugo ;
Napoli, Niccolo ;
Costa, Francesca ;
Kauffmann, Emanuele F. ;
Menonna, Francesca ;
Iacopi, Sara ;
Vistoli, Fabio ;
Amorese, Gabriella .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 40 (10) :2497-2506
[5]   Assessment of Quality Outcomes for Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomy Identification of the Learning Curve [J].
Boone, Brian A. ;
Zenati, Mazen ;
Hogg, Melissa E. ;
Steve, Jennifer ;
Moser, Arthur James ;
Bartlett, David L. ;
Zeh, Herbert J. ;
Zureikat, Amer H. .
JAMA SURGERY, 2015, 150 (05) :416-422
[6]   A Prospectively Validated Clinical Risk Score Accurately Predicts Pancreatic Fistula after Pancreatoduodenectomy [J].
Callery, Mark P. ;
Pratt, Wande B. ;
Kent, Tara S. ;
Chaikof, Elliot L. ;
Vollmer, Charles M., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 216 (01) :1-14
[7]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[8]   Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study [J].
Collins, Gary S. ;
Ogundimu, Emmanuel O. ;
Altman, Douglas G. .
STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2016, 35 (02) :214-226
[9]  
Collins GS, 2015, ANN INTERN MED, V162, P55, DOI [10.1186/s12916-014-0241-z, 10.7326/M14-0698, 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.11.010, 10.7326/M14-0697, 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.11.025, 10.1002/bjs.9736, 10.1038/bjc.2014.639, 10.1136/bmj.g7594, 10.1111/eci.12376]
[10]   Minimally-Invasive vs Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Correa-Gallego, Camilo ;
Dinkelspiel, Helen E. ;
Sulimanoff, Isabel ;
Fisher, Sarah ;
Vinuela, Eduardo F. ;
Kingham, T. Peter ;
Fong, Yuman ;
DeMatteo, Ronald P. ;
D'Angelica, Michael I. ;
Jarnagin, William R. ;
Allen, Peter J. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2014, 218 (01) :129-139