Mechanically Ventilated Broiler Sheds: a Possible Source of Aerosolized Salmonella, Campylobacter, and Escherichia coli

被引:75
作者
Chinivasagam, H. N. [1 ]
Tran, T. [1 ]
Maddock, L. [1 ]
Gale, A. [1 ]
Blackall, P. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Dept Primary Ind, Anim Res Inst, Yeerongpilly, Qld 4105, Australia
关键词
LAND APPLICATION; CROSS-CONTAMINATION; PROCESSING PLANTS; LAYING HENS; SURVIVAL; FLOCKS; BIOAEROSOLS; POULTRY; SPP; AIR;
D O I
10.1128/AEM.01380-09
中图分类号
Q81 [生物工程学(生物技术)]; Q93 [微生物学];
学科分类号
071005 ; 0836 ; 090102 ; 100705 ;
摘要
This study assessed the levels of two key pathogens, Salmonella and Campylobacter, along with the indicator organism Escherichia coli in aerosols within and outside poultry sheds. The study ranged over a 3-year period on four poultry farms and consisted of six trials across the boiler production cycle of around 55 days. Weekly testing of litter and aerosols was carried out through the cycle. A key point that emerged is that the levels of airborne bacteria are linked to the levels of these bacteria in litter. This hypothesis was demonstrated by E. coli. The typical levels of E. coli in litter were similar to 10(8) CFU g(-1) and, as a consequence, were in the range of 10(2) to 10(4) CFU m(-3) in aerosols, both inside and outside the shed. The external levels were always lower than the internal levels. Salmonella was only present intermittently in litter and at lower levels (10(3) to 10(5) most probable number [MPN] g(-1)) and consequently present only intermittently and at low levels in air inside (range of 0.65 to 4.4 MPN m(-3)) and once outside (2.3 MPN m(-3)). The Salmonella serovars isolated in litter were generally also isolated from aerosols and dust, with the Salmonella serovars Chester and Sofia being the dominant serovars across these interfaces. Campylobacter was detected late in the production cycle, in litter at levels of around 107 MPN g(-1). Campylobacter was detected only once inside the shed and then at low levels of 2.2 MPN m(-3). Thus, the public health risk from these organisms in poultry environments via the aerosol pathway is minimal.
引用
收藏
页码:7417 / 7425
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   Campylobacter spp. contamination of chicken carcasses during processing in relation to flock colonisation [J].
Allen, V. M. ;
Bull, S. A. ;
Corry, J. E. L. ;
Domingue, G. ;
Jorgensen, F. ;
Frost, J. A. ;
Whyte, R. ;
Gonzalez, A. ;
Elviss, N. ;
Humphrey, T. J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF FOOD MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 113 (01) :54-61
[2]  
Allen VM, 2003, BRIT POULTRY SCI, V44, P567, DOI [10.1080/00071660310001616183, NO_DOI]
[3]  
*AUSTR CHICK MEAT, 2007, BREED MEAT CHICK
[4]  
Baykov B, 1999, FEMS MICROBIOL ECOL, V29, P389, DOI 10.1016/S0168-6496(99)00033-1
[5]   A national study on the residential impact of biological aerosols from the land application of biosolids [J].
Brooks, JP ;
Tanner, BD ;
Josephson, KL ;
Gerba, CP ;
Haas, CN ;
Pepper, IL .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 99 (02) :310-322
[6]   Bioaerosols from the land application of biosolids in the desert southwest USA [J].
Brooks, JP ;
Tanner, BD ;
Josephson, KL ;
Gerba, CP ;
Pepper, IL .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2004, 50 (01) :7-12
[7]   Sources of Campylobacter spp. colonizing housed broiler flocks during rearing [J].
Bull, SA ;
Allen, VM ;
Domingue, G ;
Jorgensen, F ;
Frost, JA ;
Ure, R ;
Whyte, R ;
Tinker, D ;
Corry, JEL ;
Gillard-King, J ;
Humphrey, TJ .
APPLIED AND ENVIRONMENTAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 72 (01) :645-652
[8]   Evaluation of salmonella serotype distributions from commercial broiler hatcheries and grower houses [J].
Byrd, JA ;
DeLoach, JR ;
Corrier, DE ;
Nisbet, DJ ;
Stanker, LH .
AVIAN DISEASES, 1999, 43 (01) :39-47
[9]   The aerobiology of the environment around mechanically ventilated broiler sheds [J].
Chinivasagam, H. N. ;
Tran, T. ;
Maddock, L. ;
Gale, A. ;
Blackall, P. J. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2010, 108 (05) :1657-1667
[10]   Investigation and application of methods for enumerating heterotrophs and Escherichia coli in the air within piggery sheds [J].
Chinivasagam, HN ;
Blackall, PJ .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 98 (05) :1137-1145