Maneuvering the bumps in the New Silk Road: Open innovation, technological complexity, dominant design, and the international impact of Chinese innovation

被引:34
作者
Brem, Alexander [1 ,2 ]
Nylund, Petra A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Entrepreneurship & Innovat Sci, Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Univ Southern Denmark, Mads Clausen Inst, Sonderborg, Denmark
关键词
RESEARCH-AND-DEVELOPMENT; EXTERNAL PARTNERSHIPS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; REVERSE INNOVATION; PERFORMANCE; KNOWLEDGE; NETWORKS; CAPABILITIES; SMES; FIRM;
D O I
10.1111/radm.12451
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Chinese innovation is again flowing westwards, which is fomented by China's Belt and Road Initiative. In this context, we study the international impact of innovations from specific countries. Based on panel data of patents from 27 countries over 17 years, we find that levels of open innovation, technological complexity, and dominant design influence the international impact of innovations from a country. Contrary to earlier research, however, this influence is negative when open innovation activities are involved. This is particularly relevant in the context of Chinese innovation, in which the same innovation networks that promote efficient production may hinder the development of innovations. Due to the innate uncertainty and newness of innovation, partners beyond the common local and long-term networks must be included. Hence, to effectively create a New Silk Road of Innovation, innovation ecosystems may need to expand across national borders. This opens up fruitful avenues for future research, and individuals with multiple cultural identities can bridge the gaps between contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:293 / 308
页数:16
相关论文
共 104 条
  • [21] Breschi S., 1997, Systems of Innovation. Technologies, P130, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203357620
  • [22] Breznitz D., 2011, Run of the red queen: Government, innovation, globalization, and economic growth in China
  • [23] China's Belt and Road Initiative and the COVID-19 crisis
    Buckley, Peter J.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS POLICY, 2020, 3 (03) : 311 - 314
  • [24] Open innovation: Are inbound and outbound knowledge flows really complementary?
    Cassiman, Bruno
    Valentini, Giovanni
    [J]. STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2016, 37 (06) : 1034 - 1046
  • [25] Castells M., 2006, Rise of the Network Society
  • [26] Chen J, 2012, R&D MANAGE, V42, P273
  • [27] The influence of scope, depth, and orientation of external technology sources on the innovative performance of Chinese firms
    Chen, Jin
    Chen, Yufen
    Vanhaverbeke, Wim
    [J]. TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (08) : 362 - 373
  • [28] Chesbrough H., 2003, OPEN INNOVATION
  • [29] Chesbrough H., 2006, Open innovation: Researching a new paradigm
  • [30] Chesbrough H., 2014, New frontiers in open innovation. Explicating open innovation: Clarifying an emerging paradigm for understanding innovation, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780199682461.003.0001