A READABILITY COMPARISON OF ONLINE SPANISH AND ENGLISH PATIENT EDUCATION MATERIALS ABOUT VISION HEALTH

被引:11
作者
Karthik, Naveen [1 ]
Barekatain, Kayvan [1 ]
Vu, Hoang [2 ]
Wu, Danny T. Y. [2 ]
Ehrlich, Joshua R. [3 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Med, Cleveland, OH USA
[2] Univ Cincinnati, Coll Med, Dept Biomed Informat, Cincinnati, OH USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[4] Univ Michigan, Inst Healthcare Policy & Innovat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Readability; patient education; vision and eye health; health literacy; internet;
D O I
10.1080/09286586.2021.1910316
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Purpose : Current United States national guidelines recommend patient education materials (PEMs) be written at a 5(th)-6(th) grade level. The objective of this study was to compare the readability of Spanish vision and eye health PEMs to nationally recommended reading levels and to English versions of the same PEMs. Methods : PEMs were collected from seven online websites of vision-related organizations that provided PEMs with Spanish and English versions. PEMs were downloaded for text to be extracted and analyzed. Readability scoring was performed with indice Flesch-Szigriszt, Spanish and English Lexile Text Analyzers, and Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level. Results : A total of 484 PEMs with Spanish and English versions were analyzed. Readability for Spanish PEMs was reported at or above the 6(th) grade level for 57% of articles based on Spanish Lexile scoring and 63% based on indice Flesch-Szigriszt scoring. Readability for English PEMs was reported at or above the 6(th) grade level for 66% of articles based on English Lexile scoring and 75% based on Flesch-Kincaid Grade Level scoring. Wilcoxon signed-rank test comparing grade levels translated from Lexile scores for Spanish and English versions of PEMs revealed that Spanish versions of PEMs required higher grade reading levels compared to English versions of PEMs (p < .001). Conclusion : Spanish and English PEMs were written above nationally recommended reading levels. Online sources providing multilingual vision and eye health education should consider routinely monitoring PEMs to ensure reading levels meet the literacy needs of their audiences.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 188
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
Aldridge Michael D, 2004, Nephrol Nurs J, V31, P373
[2]  
[Anonymous], LEXILE ANAL US GUID
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, Simply Put A Guide for Creating Easy-to-Understand Materials
[4]  
[Anonymous], Clear simple
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2008, METAMETRICS LAUNCHES
[6]   Assessing Readability of Patient Education Materials: Current Role in Orthopaedics [J].
Badarudeen, Sameer ;
Sabharwal, Sanjeev .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2010, 468 (10) :2572-2580
[7]  
Barrio I., 2015, PROGRAMA INFLESZ
[8]  
Barrio-Cantalejo IM, 2008, AN SIST SANIT NAVAR, V31, P135, DOI 10.4321/s1137-66272008000300004
[9]   Low Health Literacy and Health Outcomes: An Updated Systematic Review [J].
Berkman, Nancy D. ;
Sheridan, Stacey L. ;
Donahue, Katrina E. ;
Halpern, David J. ;
Crotty, Karen .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2011, 155 (02) :97-+
[10]   Health Literacy among Spanish-Speaking Patients in the Emergency Department [J].
Brice, Jane H. ;
Travers, Debbie ;
Cowden, Christopher S. ;
Young, Matthew D. ;
Sanhueza, Antonio ;
Dunston, Yolanda .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2008, 100 (11) :1326-1332