On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations

被引:49
|
作者
deSouza, Priyanka [1 ,2 ]
Kinney, Patrick L. [3 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Low-cost air quality sensors; PurpleAir; EPA monitors; Environmental justice; Public health; POLLUTION; EXPOSURE; AMBIENT;
D O I
10.1038/s41370-021-00328-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background Low-cost sensors have the potential to democratize air pollution information and supplement regulatory networks. However, differentials in access to these sensors could exacerbate existing inequalities in the ability of different communities to respond to the threat of air pollution. Objective Our goal was to analyze patterns of deployments of a commonly used low-cost sensor, as a function of demographics and pollutant concentrations. Methods We used Wilcoxon rank sum tests to assess differences between socioeconomic characteristics and PM2.5 concentrations of locations with low-cost sensors and those with regulatory monitors. We used Kolomogorov-Smirnov tests to examine how representative census tracts with sensors were of the United States. We analyzed predictors of the presence, and number of, sensors in a tract using regressions. Results Census tracts with low-cost sensors were higher income more White and more educated than the US as a whole and than tracts with regulatory monitors. For all states except for California they are in locations with lower annual-average PM2.5 concentrations than regulatory monitors. The existing presence of a regulatory monitor, the percentage of people living above the poverty line and PM2.5 concentrations were associated with the presence of low-cost sensors in a tract. Significance Strategies to improve access to low-cost sensors in less-privileged communities are needed to democratize air pollution data.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 524
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Measuring Air Quality for Advocacy in Africa (MA3): Feasibility and Practicality of Longitudinal Ambient PM2.5 Measurement Using Low-Cost Sensors
    Awokola, Babatunde, I
    Okello, Gabriel
    Mortimer, Kevin J.
    Jewell, Christopher P.
    Erhart, Annette
    Semple, Sean
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 17
  • [22] Schoolchildren's exposure to PM2.5: a student club-based air quality monitoring campaign using low-cost sensors
    Chen, L-W Antony
    Olawepo, John O.
    Bonanno, Felicia
    Gebreselassie, Aman
    Zhang, Mi
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2020, 13 (05) : 543 - 551
  • [23] Research Priorities of Applying Low-Cost PM2.5 Sensors in Southeast Asian Countries
    Lung, Shih-Chun Candice
    Thi Hien, To
    Cambaliza, Maria Obiminda L.
    Hlaing, Ohnmar May Tin
    Oanh, Nguyen Thi Kim
    Latif, Mohd Talib
    Lestari, Puji
    Salam, Abdus
    Lee, Shih-Yu
    Wang, Wen-Cheng Vincent
    Tsou, Ming-Chien Mark
    Cong-Thanh, Tran
    Cruz, Melliza Templonuevo
    Tantrakarnapa, Kraichat
    Othman, Murnira
    Roy, Shatabdi
    Dang, Tran Ngoc
    Agustian, Dwi
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2022, 19 (03)
  • [24] Air Quality Monitoring with Low-Cost Sensors: A Record of the Increase of PM2.5 during Christmas and New Year's Eve Celebrations in the City of Queretaro, Mexico
    Rodriguez-Trejo, Alejandro
    Bohnel, Harald N.
    Ibarra-Ortega, Hector E.
    Salcedo, Dara
    Gonzalez-Guzman, Renee
    Castaneda-Miranda, Ana G.
    Sanchez-Ramos, Luis E.
    Chaparro, Mauro A. E.
    Chaparro, Marcos A. E.
    ATMOSPHERE, 2024, 15 (08)
  • [25] Using Low-cost Sensors to Quantify the Effects of Air Filtration on Indoor and Personal Exposure Relevant PM2.5 Concentrations in Beijing, China
    Barkjohn, Karoline K.
    Bergin, Michael H.
    Norris, Christina
    Schauer, James J.
    Zhang, Yinping
    Black, Maril yn
    Hu, Min
    Zhang, Junfeng
    AEROSOL AND AIR QUALITY RESEARCH, 2020, 20 (02) : 297 - 313
  • [26] One year evaluation of three low-cost PM2.5 monitors
    Zamora, Misti Levy
    Rice, Jessica
    Koehler, Kirsten
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 235
  • [27] Using crowd-sourced low-cost sensors in a land use regression of PM2.5 in 6 US cities
    Lu, Tianjun
    Bechle, Matthew J.
    Wan, Yanyu
    Presto, Albert A.
    Hankey, Steve
    AIR QUALITY ATMOSPHERE AND HEALTH, 2022, 15 (04) : 667 - 678
  • [28] Network of low-cost air quality sensors for monitoring indoor, outdoor, and personal PM2.5 exposure in Seattle during the 2020 wildfire season
    He, Jiayang
    Huang, Ching-Hsuan
    Yuan, Nanhsun
    Austin, Elena
    Seto, Edmund
    Novosselov, Igor
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2022, 285
  • [29] Ensemble learning of model hyperparameters and spatiotemporal data for calibration of low-cost PM2.5 sensors
    Yin, Peng-Yeng
    Tsai, Chih-Chun
    Day, Rong-Fuh
    Tung, Ching-Ying
    Bhanu, Bir
    MATHEMATICAL BIOSCIENCES AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 16 (06) : 6858 - 6873
  • [30] Calibrating low-cost sensors using MERRA-2 reconstructed PM2.5 mass concentration as a proxy
    Malyan, Vasudev
    Kumar, Vikas
    Sahu, Manoranjan
    Prakash, Jai
    Choudhary, Shruti
    Raliya, Ramesh
    Chadha, Tandeep S.
    Fang, Jiaxi
    Biswas, Pratim
    ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION RESEARCH, 2024, 15 (03)