On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations

被引:49
|
作者
deSouza, Priyanka [1 ,2 ]
Kinney, Patrick L. [3 ]
机构
[1] MIT, Dept Urban Studies & Planning, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA
[2] WHO, Geneva, Switzerland
[3] Boston Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Environm Hlth, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Low-cost air quality sensors; PurpleAir; EPA monitors; Environmental justice; Public health; POLLUTION; EXPOSURE; AMBIENT;
D O I
10.1038/s41370-021-00328-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Background Low-cost sensors have the potential to democratize air pollution information and supplement regulatory networks. However, differentials in access to these sensors could exacerbate existing inequalities in the ability of different communities to respond to the threat of air pollution. Objective Our goal was to analyze patterns of deployments of a commonly used low-cost sensor, as a function of demographics and pollutant concentrations. Methods We used Wilcoxon rank sum tests to assess differences between socioeconomic characteristics and PM2.5 concentrations of locations with low-cost sensors and those with regulatory monitors. We used Kolomogorov-Smirnov tests to examine how representative census tracts with sensors were of the United States. We analyzed predictors of the presence, and number of, sensors in a tract using regressions. Results Census tracts with low-cost sensors were higher income more White and more educated than the US as a whole and than tracts with regulatory monitors. For all states except for California they are in locations with lower annual-average PM2.5 concentrations than regulatory monitors. The existing presence of a regulatory monitor, the percentage of people living above the poverty line and PM2.5 concentrations were associated with the presence of low-cost sensors in a tract. Significance Strategies to improve access to low-cost sensors in less-privileged communities are needed to democratize air pollution data.
引用
收藏
页码:514 / 524
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] On the distribution of low-cost PM2.5 sensors in the US: demographic and air quality associations
    Priyanka deSouza
    Patrick L. Kinney
    Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology, 2021, 31 : 514 - 524
  • [2] Evaluations of Low-cost Air Quality Sensors for Particulate Matter (PM2.5) under Indoor and Outdoor Conditions
    Rabuan, Utbah
    Nadzir, Mohd Shahrul Mohd
    Sham, Siti Zahanah Abdullah
    Bahri, Sharifah Batrisyia Izzati Wan Shaiful
    Borah, Jintu
    Majumdar, Shubhankar
    Lei, Thomas M. T.
    Ali, Sawal Hamid Md
    Wahab, Muhammad Ikram A.
    Yunus, Noor Hidayah Mohd
    SENSORS AND MATERIALS, 2023, 35 (08) : 2881 - 2895
  • [3] Analysis of spatiotemporal PM2.5 concentration patterns in Changwon, Korea, using low-cost PM2.5 sensors
    Song, Bonggeun
    Park, Kyunghun
    Kim, Taehyeung
    Seo, Gyeongho
    URBAN CLIMATE, 2022, 46
  • [4] Performance evaluation of twelve low-cost PM2.5 sensors at an ambient air monitoring site
    Feenstra, Brandon
    Papapostolou, Vasileios
    Hasheminassab, Sina
    Zhang, Hang
    Boghossian, Berj Der
    Cocker, David
    Polidori, Andrea
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2019, 216
  • [5] Evaluating Indoor Air Quality in Residential Environments: A Study of PM2.5 and CO2 Dynamics Using Low-Cost Sensors
    Shah, Kabir Bahadur
    Kim, Dylan
    Pinakana, Sai Deepak
    Hobosyan, Mkhitar
    Montes, Armando
    Raysoni, Amit U.
    ENVIRONMENTS, 2024, 11 (11)
  • [6] Temporal and spatial variation of PM2.5 in indoor air monitored by low-cost sensors
    Shen, Huizhong
    Hou, Weiying
    Zhu, Yaqi
    Zheng, Shuxiu
    Ainiwaer, Subinuer
    Shen, Guofeng
    Chen, Yilin
    Cheng, Hefa
    Hu, Jianying
    Wan, Yi
    Tao, Shu
    SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2021, 770
  • [7] Towards a hygroscopic growth calibration for low-cost PM2.5 sensors
    Patel, Milan Y.
    Vannucci, Pietro F.
    Kim, Jinsol
    Berelson, William M.
    Cohen, Ronald C.
    ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES, 2024, 17 (03) : 1051 - 1060
  • [8] Performance of low-cost indoor air quality monitors for PM2.5 and PM10 from residential sources
    Wang, Zhiqiang
    Delp, William W.
    Singer, Brett C.
    BUILDING AND ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 171
  • [9] Long-term evaluation and calibration of three types of low-cost PM2.5 sensors at different air quality monitoring stations
    Hong, Gung-Hwa
    Le, Thi-Cuc
    Tu, Jing-Wei
    Wang, Chieh
    Chang, Shuenn-Chin
    Yu, Jhih-Yuan
    Lin, Guan-Yu
    Aggarwal, Shankar G.
    Tsai, Chuen-Jinn
    JOURNAL OF AEROSOL SCIENCE, 2021, 157
  • [10] Assessment of PM2.5 concentrations, transport, and mitigation in indoor environments using low-cost air quality monitors and a portable air cleaner
    Sankhyan, Sumit
    Witteman, Julia K.
    Coyan, Steven
    Patel, Sameer
    Vance, Marina E.
    ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE-ATMOSPHERES, 2022, 2 (04): : 647 - 658