Innovation concentration in knowledge network

被引:2
作者
Zheng, Jifeng [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Univ Finance & Econ, Sch Econ, Shanghai, Peoples R China
关键词
MONOPOLISTIC COMPETITION; GROWTH; MARKET; TRADE; FIRMS; INDUSTRIES; SIZE;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0266530
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
This paper studies the increase in innovation concentration levels of U.S. industries over the last two decades. I present a model of imperfectly competitive patent market with heterogeneous firms that generate endogenous variable markups. Theoretically and empirically, the price of a firm's newly invented knowledge, the profit and survival rate of the innovating firm depends on the market share of this firm's knowledge stock and the position of industry in the knowledge network. In the process of innovating, firm pays a random fixed cost in each period which together with market share largely determines its decision on whether to innovate into different sectors. I find that firms with larger market share not only invest more in R&D but also enter into more sectors. Since innovating firms could create blueprints for new varieties and manufacture the products that have been invented, I bridge the gap between the product and the R&D markets to document the similar concentration trends between them. I prove that large firms in the product market would charge higher price on their product so that they can charge higher profit which is a part of the value of their knowledge. Lastly, the increasing trend of concentration could decrease consumers' welfare in the industries with high initial concentration levels.
引用
收藏
页数:33
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Growth through Heterogeneous Innovations [J].
Akcigit, Ufuk ;
Kerr, William R. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2018, 126 (04) :1374-1443
[2]   RegData: Anumerical database on industry-specific regulations for all United States industries and federal regulations, 1997-2012 [J].
Al-Ubaydli, Omar ;
McLaughlin, Patrick A. .
REGULATION & GOVERNANCE, 2017, 11 (01) :109-123
[3]   Pricing-to-Market, Trade Costs, and International Relative Prices [J].
Atkeson, Andrew ;
Burstein, Ariel .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2008, 98 (05) :1998-2031
[4]   THE FALL OF THE LABOR SHARE AND THE RISE OF SUPERSTAR FIRMS [J].
Autor, David ;
Dorn, David ;
Katz, Lawrence F. ;
Patterson, Christina ;
Van Reenen, John .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 2020, 135 (02) :645-709
[5]   NOTES AND COMMENTS CASCADING FAILURES IN PRODUCTION NETWORKS [J].
Baqaee, David Rezza .
ECONOMETRICA, 2018, 86 (05) :1819-1838
[6]   General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: A new approach [J].
Behrens, Kristian ;
Murata, Yasusada .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC THEORY, 2007, 136 (01) :776-787
[7]   Multiple-Product Firms and Product Switching [J].
Bernard, Andrew B. ;
Redding, Stephen J. ;
Schott, Peter K. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) :70-97
[8]   Variable markups in the long-run: A generalization of preferences in growth models [J].
Boucekkine, Raouf ;
Latzer, Helene ;
Parenti, Mathieu .
JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL ECONOMICS, 2017, 68 :80-86
[9]   Growth Through Inter-sectoral Knowledge Linkages [J].
Cai, Jie ;
Li, Nan .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 2019, 86 (05) :1827-1866
[10]  
COHEN WM, 1992, AM ECON REV, V82, P773