QUIC Protocol with Post-quantum Authentication

被引:9
作者
Raavi, Manohar [1 ]
Wuthier, Simeon [1 ]
Chandramouli, Pranav [1 ]
Zhou, Xiaobo [1 ]
Chang, Sang-Yoon [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Colorado, Dept Comp Sci, Colorado Springs, CO 80918 USA
来源
INFORMATION SECURITY, ISC 2022 | 2022年 / 13640卷
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
QUIC; TCP; TLS; Post-quantum cryptography; Digital signatures;
D O I
10.1007/978-3-031-22390-7_6
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Post-quantum ciphers (PQC) are designed to replace the current public-key ciphers which are vulnerable against the quantum-equipped adversaries, e.g., RSA. We study the incorporation of the PQC algorithms into the QUIC and TCP/TLS networking protocols and analyze the performances and overheads in authentication and connection establishment. To distinguish from previous research, we focus on the newer QUIC networking protocol while comparing it with TCP/TLS. The QUIC protocol builds on UDP and its superiority over TCP/TLS is highlighted by the quicker and lower-overhead connection establishments. QUIC is thus gaining wider deployment, including its planned standardization for HTTP/3. We implement and experiment in local networking environment which provides greater analyzability and control. We compare QUIC vs. TCP/TLS when using PQC and measure the handshake overhead in time duration while varying both the PQC security strength and the networking conditions. Our results show that the PQC overhead increases with the PQC cipher security strength (the key and signature sizes) and as the network condition worsens (greater occurrences of packet dropping). Comparing between the PQC and the classical cipher with comparable security strengths, the PQC ciphers outperform RSA in the handshake time duration; both Dilithium 2 and Falcon 512 handshakes are quicker than RSA 3072.
引用
收藏
页码:84 / 91
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Alagic G., 2022, STATUS REPORT 3 ROUN
  • [2] [Anonymous], lsquic github." {
  • [3] [Anonymous], Nist-call for proposals." {
  • [4] [Anonymous], PERCENTAGE HTTPS TLS
  • [5] Bider D, 2018, 8332 RFC, DOI [10.17487/RFC8332, DOI 10.17487/RFC8332]
  • [6] Bishop M., 2021, IN PRESS
  • [7] Ducas Leo, 2018, IACR Trans Cryptogr Hardw Embed Syst, V1, P238, DOI [DOI 10.46586/TCHES.V2018.I1.238-268, 10.13154/tches.v2018.i1.238-268, DOI 10.13154/TCHES.V2018.I1.238-268]
  • [8] Fouque P.A, 2018, FALCON FAST FO UNPUB
  • [9] Frankel S, 2011, RFC 6071, P1
  • [10] Iyengar J., 2021, RFC 9000