A step forward on sustainability in the cosmetics industry: A review

被引:200
作者
Born, S. [1 ]
Jorge, J. [1 ]
Ribeiro, H. M. [2 ]
Marto, J. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Lisbon, Fac Pharm, P-1649003 Lisbon, Portugal
[2] Univ Lisbon, Fac Pharm, Res Inst Med iMed ULisboa, Ave Prof Gama Pinto, P-1649003 Lisbon, Portugal
关键词
Cosmetics; Green; Natural; Organic; Sustainable; Cosmetic product life cycle; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ECO-INNOVATIONS; SKIN; PRODUCTS; GREEN; FORMALDEHYDE; PERCEPTIONS; MICROBEADS; EMOLLIENTS; EMULSIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.255
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In recent years, sustainability on the cosmetics industry has received growing interest from consumers, cosmetics industries and organizations, as well as academics from various disciplinary fields. Increasing concerns about cosmetics safety, environmental impacts as deforestation and social impacts as those resulting from unfair trade have intensified attention given to such topic. While sustainability impacts occur through all phases of the cosmetic product life cycle, selection of raw materials is deserving of greater attention as information on this topic remains scattered and diffuse. Formulating with alternative ingredients considered more sustainable can be quite challenging due to possible lack of performance, instability and aesthetic limitations normally associated with their use. This paper discusses the relation between sustainability and the cosmetics industry, the factors stimulating the developments on this field, the need to assess those and the available tools, alongside with the sustainability impacts produced during all the product life cycle. The analysis reveals cosmetics sustainability as a complex and multifaceted issue that cannot be evaluated considering single aspects, but using an integrated assessment about the environmental, social and economical dimensions and about the final product quality and performance. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:270 / 290
页数:21
相关论文
共 164 条
[131]   A systemic framework for sustainability assessment [J].
Sala, Serenella ;
Ciuffo, Biagio ;
Nijkamp, Peter .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2015, 119 :314-325
[132]   Are sunscreens a new environmental risk associated with coastal tourism? [J].
Sanchez-Quiles, David ;
Tovar-Sanchez, Antonio .
ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 83 :158-170
[133]  
Saraf S., 2012, TREATMENT DRY SKIN S, P379, DOI [10.1007/978-3-642-27606-4_25, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-27606-4_25]
[134]  
Saurat M., 2015, Overview of existing sustainability assessment methods and tools, and of relevant standards
[135]  
Saxe J., 2011, FORMULATING PACKAGIN, P389, DOI [10.1002/9781118056806, DOI 10.1002/9781118056806]
[136]  
Schaffer T., 2007, Euro Cosmet, V9, P2
[137]  
Schroeder P, 2010, Skin Therapy Lett, V15, P4
[138]  
Scudo A., 2017, Intentionally added microplastics in products
[139]   Assessing eco-innovations in green chemistry: Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) of a cosmetic product with a bio-based ingredient [J].
Secchi, Michela ;
Castellani, Valentina ;
Collina, Elena ;
Mirabella, Nadia ;
Sala, Serenella .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2016, 129 :269-281
[140]  
Sell CS, 2014, CHEMISTRY AND THE SENSE OF SMELL, P296