Comparison of intranasal and nebulized dexmedetomidine for premedication in pediatric patients: A non-inferiority randomized controlled trial

被引:2
作者
Verma, Shilpi [1 ]
Bhatia, Pradeep Kumar [2 ]
Sharma, Vandana [3 ]
Mohammed, Sadik [2 ]
Saran, Anita [4 ]
机构
[1] AIIMS, Dept Anesthesiol, Raebarelly, Uttar Pradesh, India
[2] All India Inst Med Sci, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
[3] Dr SN Med Coll, Dept Anesthesiol & Crit Care, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India
[4] Frimley Hlth Fdn Trust, Anaesthet Dept, NHS, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Dexmedetomidine; intranasal; nebulization; premedication; PRESCHOOL-CHILDREN; MIDAZOLAM; SEDATION; ANESTHESIA; INDUCTION; KETAMINE; ANXIETY;
D O I
10.4103/joacp.JOACP_6_21
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Aims: Dexmedetomidine is a highly selective a-2 adrenoreceptor agonist and has been found to be an effective premedication agent when administered via the intranasal route. We aimed to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine premedication administered via intranasal route and through nebulization in pediatric patients. Material and Methods: This non-inferiority randomized controlled trial was conducted after getting approval from institutes ethics committee and informed written parental consent. Sixty-four children aged 2-8 years scheduled for elective surgery under general anesthesia were enrolled and were divided into two groups. Group I (Intranasal, n = 33) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine via intranasal route and group N (Nebulized, n = 31) received 2 mcg/kg dexmedetomidine through nebulization. The primary outcome was number of patients with satisfactory sedation 30 minutes after premedication at separation from parent. The secondary outcome included ease of medication acceptance, anxiety at parental separation, acceptance of anesthesia mask, perioperative hemodynamics, emergence agitation during recovery and adverse effects. Data collected was analyzed using Chi-square test, Student "t" test and Mann-Whitney U test with the help of SPSS 22. A one tailed P value < 0.025 was considered significant. Results: Demographic profile was comparable between groups. On arrival in OR 27 (81.8%) patients in group I and 21 (67.7%) patients in group N had satisfactory sedation score (P = 0.19). The median (IQR) sedation score was comparable between group I and group N (P = 0.057). Patients in Group I showed significantly better medication and mask acceptance scores (P < 0.0001, P = 0.001 respectively), parental separation anxiety score (P < 0.0001) and emergence agitation score (P = 0.001). There were no significant differences in hemodynamic parameters and adverse effects between the groups. Conclusion: Although nebulized dexmedetomidine is non-inferior to intranasal dexmedetomidine in providing desired level of sedation but intranasal administration had better acceptance of medication and anesthesia mask with lesser anxiety at parental separation and postoperative emergence agitation.
引用
收藏
页码:617 / 623
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Comparison of nebulised dexmedetomidine, ketamine, or midazolam for premedication in preschool children undergoing bone marrow biopsy [J].
Abdel-Ghaffar, H. S. ;
Kamal, S. M. ;
El Sheriff, F. A. ;
Mohamed, S. A. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 2018, 121 (02) :445-452
[2]   Bioavailability of dexmedetomidine after extravascular doses in healthy subjects [J].
Anttila, M ;
Penttilä, J ;
Helminen, A ;
Vuorilehto, L ;
Scheinin, H .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2003, 56 (06) :691-693
[3]   Randomised Comparison between the Efficacy of Two Doses of Nebulised Dexmedetomidine for Premedication in Paediatric Patients [J].
Anupriya, Jindal ;
Kurhekar, Pranjali .
TURKISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIOLOGY AND REANIMATION, 2020, 48 (04) :314-320
[4]  
Behrle Natalie, 2017, J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther, V22, P4, DOI 10.5863/1551-6776-22.1.4
[5]  
Bhat Ravi, 2016, Anesth Essays Res, V10, P349, DOI 10.4103/0259-1162.172340
[6]   PREANESTHETIC MEDICATION WITH INTRANASAL MIDAZOLAM FOR BRIEF PEDIATRIC SURGICAL-PROCEDURES - EFFECT ON RECOVERY AND HOSPITAL DISCHARGE TIMES [J].
DAVIS, PJ ;
TOME, JA ;
MCGOWAN, FX ;
COHEN, IT ;
LATTA, K ;
FELDER, H .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (01) :2-5
[7]   Effects of dexmedetomidine versus midazolam for premedication in paediatric anaesthesia with sevoflurane: A meta-analysis [J].
Feng, Ji-Feng ;
Wang, Xiao-Xia ;
Lu, Yan-Yan ;
Pang, Deng-ge ;
Peng, Wei ;
Mo, Jian-lan .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 45 (03) :912-923
[8]   Practical guide to sample size calculations: non-inferiority and equivalence trials [J].
Flight, Laura ;
Julious, Steven A. .
PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS, 2016, 15 (01) :80-89
[9]  
Hosey MT, 2009, BRIT DENT J, V207, DOI 10.1038/sj.bdj.2009.570
[10]   Dental anxiety, distress at induction and postoperative morbidity in children undergoing tooth extraction using general anaesthesia [J].
Hosey, MT ;
MacPherson, LMD ;
Adair, P ;
Tochel, C ;
Burnside, G ;
Pine, C .
BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2006, 200 (01) :39-43