A tale of two public dental benefit programs: Iowa dentist participation in traditional Medicaid versus a Medicaid expansion program

被引:11
作者
Reynolds, Julie C. [1 ,2 ]
McKernan, Susan C. [1 ,2 ]
Damiano, Peter C. [1 ,2 ]
Kuthy, Raymond A. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Iowa, Publ Policy Ctr, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
[2] Univ Iowa, Coll Dent, Iowa City, IA 52242 USA
来源
BMC ORAL HEALTH | 2019年 / 19卷
关键词
Access to care; Dental benefits; Dental health services; Dental insurance; Dental private practice; Health policy; Managed care programs; Medicaid; Public health; Community dentistry; ACCEPTANCE;
D O I
10.1186/s12903-019-0771-z
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
BackgroundIn Iowa from 2014 to 2017, there were 2 separate public dental benefit programs for Medicaid-enrolled adults: one for the Medicaid expansion population called the Dental Wellness Plan (DWP), and one for the traditional, non-expansion adult Medicaid population. The programs differed with respect to reimbursement, administration, and benefit structure. This study explored differences in patterns and predictors of dentist participation in the two programs.MethodsAuthors sent a survey to all private practice dentists in Iowa (n=1301) 2years after DWP implementation. Descriptive, bivariate, and logistic regression analyses were used to examine patterns and predictors of dentist participation in Medicaid and DWP.ResultsOverall rates of dentists' acceptance of new Medicaid and DWP patients were 45 and 43%, respectively. However, Medicaid participants were much more likely than DWP participants to place limits on patient acceptance. Adjusting for other factors, practice busyness was the only significant predictor of DWP participation, and practice location was the only significant predictor of Medicaid participation. Dentists who were not busy enough were more than twice as likely to participate in DWP compared to others, and dentists in rural areas were almost twice as likely to participate in Medicaid compared to dentists in urban areas.ConclusionsDentist participation in Medicaid is an ongoing concern for states aiming to ensure access to dental care for low-income populations. We found distinct participation patterns and predictors between a traditional Medicaid dental program and the DWP, suggesting different motivations for participation between the two programs.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Al Agili DE, 2007, PEDIATR DENT, V29, P293
  • [2] American Dental Association Health Policy Institute, 2016, DENT PART MED CHIP F
  • [3] [Anonymous], FACTORS AFFECTING IO
  • [4] Catalanotto F, 2011, TERESA DAVIS MN REIM
  • [5] Center for Health Care Strategies I, 2018, MED AD DENT BEN OV C
  • [6] Acceptance of New Medicaid Patients by Primary Care Physicians and Experiences with Physician Availability among Children on Medicaid or the Children's Health Insurance Program
    Decker, Sandra L.
    [J]. HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2015, 50 (05) : 1508 - 1527
  • [7] Gupta N., 2017, MEDICAID FEE SERVICE
  • [8] Hing E, 2013, ACCEPTANCE NEW PATIE
  • [9] Iowa Department of Human Services, 2017, DEM AM IOW WELLN PLA
  • [10] Dentist workforce trends in a primarily rural state Iowa: 1997-2007
    Kuthy, Raymond A.
    McKernan, Susan C.
    Hand, Jed S.
    Johnsen, David C.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN DENTAL ASSOCIATION, 2009, 140 (12) : 1527 - 1534