Divorce laws and fertility

被引:18
作者
Bellido, Hector [1 ]
Marcen, Miriam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zaragoza, Fac Econ & Empresa, Zaragoza 50005, Spain
关键词
Fertility rate; Divorce law; Abortion law; Oral contraception; LABOR-FORCE PARTICIPATION; UNILATERAL DIVORCE; FEMALE EMPLOYMENT; MARRIAGE; RATES; IMPACT; ABORTION; POLICY; PILL; CUSTODY;
D O I
10.1016/j.labeco.2014.01.005
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper examines the effect of divorce law reforms on fertility using the history of legislation on divorce across Europe. Because the introduction of more liberal divorce laws permanently reduces the value of marriage relative to divorce, these permanent shocks should also affect the fertility decisions of individuals, to the extent that children are considered marriage-specific capital. Our results suggest that divorce liberalization has a negative and permanent effect on fertility. Divorce reforms have decreased the Total Fertility Rate by about 0.2. The magnitude of the effect is sizable, taking into account that the average Total Fertility Rate declined from 2.84 in 1960 to 1.66 in 2006. These findings are robust to alternative specifications and controls for observed (the liberalization of abortion and the availability of the birth-control pill, among others) and unobserved country-specific factors, as well as time-varying factors at the country level. Supplemental analysis, developed to understand the mechanisms through which divorce law reforms affect fertility, shows that both marital and out-of-wedlock fertility decline, but that the impact on marital fertility varies, depending on whether couples are married prior to or after the divorce law reforms, pointing to a selection effect on the composition of marriages. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:56 / 70
页数:15
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The impact of welfare on young mothers' subsequent childbearing decisions [J].
Acs, G .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN RESOURCES, 1996, 31 (04) :898-915
[2]   A note on the changing relationship between fertility and female employment rates in developed countries [J].
Ahn, N ;
Mira, P .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2002, 15 (04) :667-682
[3]   Job bust, baby bust?: Evidence from Spain [J].
Ahn, N ;
Mira, P .
JOURNAL OF POPULATION ECONOMICS, 2001, 14 (03) :505-521
[4]  
Alesina A., 2007, 2157 IZA DP
[5]  
Ananat EO, 2007, J HUM RESOUR, V42, P375
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2004, IMPACT ED FERTILITY
[7]   "Momma's Got the Pill": How Anthony Comstock and Griswold v. Connecticut Shaped US Childbearing [J].
Bailey, Martha J. .
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2010, 100 (01) :98-129
[8]  
Bailey MJ, 2006, Q J ECON, V121, P289
[9]  
Becker G., 1991, A treatise on the family
[10]   A REFORMULATION OF THE ECONOMIC-THEORY OF FERTILITY [J].
BECKER, GS ;
BARRO, RJ .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1988, 103 (01) :1-25