Vaginal repair of nonradiogenic urogenital fistulas

被引:4
作者
Moergeli, Claudia [1 ]
Tunn, Ralf [1 ]
机构
[1] Alexianer St Hedwig Hosp, Dept Urogynecol, Berlin, Germany
关键词
Urethrovaginal fistulas; Vaginal surgical approach; Vesicovaginal fistulas; VESICOVAGINAL FISTULA; MANAGEMENT; EXPERIENCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00192-020-04496-x
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Introduction and hypothesis In developed countries urogenital fistulas are rare and usually a complication of surgery or radiation therapy. Surgical repair can be accomplished transvaginally or by laparotomy, laparoscopy, robotic-assisted laparoscopy, or transurethral endoscopy. Closure can be achieved with or without tissue interposition. The vaginal approach is the least invasive and a variety of techniques with or without tissue interpositions and flaps have been described. This study reviews surgical approaches and techniques for the repair of nonradiogenic urogenital fistulas. Methods We identified and reviewed records from all patients treated for urogenital fistulas at our unit between 2008 and 2018. We analyzed fistula location, etiology, type and duration of corrective surgery, length of hospitalization, as well as complication and success rates. Results Fifty patients (mean age 52 years) were identified. 49 fistulas were related to previous gynecological surgery, 3 were related to obstetric trauma. Thirty-four patients had vesicovaginal, 11 urethrovaginal, 3 ureterovaginal, and 2 neobladder-vaginal fistulas. Forty-eight patients (96%) were operated on using a vaginal approach; a modified Sims-Simon repair was used in 47 cases (94%). No flaps or tissue interpositions were used. In 48 patients (96%) successful closure was achieved with one operation; the modified Sims-Simon technique was successful in all 47 cases. The median operation time was 40 min (range, 20-100 min); the complication rate was 14%. Conclusions This series demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of vaginal repair of benign gynecological fistulas. The success rate was high and extensive procedures were avoided.
引用
收藏
页码:2449 / 2454
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Albers P, 2014, STANDARDOPERATIONEN
[2]   Guidelines of how to manage vesicovaginal fistula [J].
Angioli, R ;
Penalver, M ;
Muzii, L ;
Mendez, L ;
Mirhashemi, R ;
Bellati, F ;
Crocè, C ;
Panici, PB .
CRITICAL REVIEWS IN ONCOLOGY HEMATOLOGY, 2003, 48 (03) :295-304
[3]   Management of vesicovaginal fistulas (VVFs) in women following benign gynaecologic surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Bodner-Adler, Barbara ;
Hanzal, Engelbert ;
Pablik, Eleonore ;
Koelbl, Heinz ;
Bodner, Klaus .
PLOS ONE, 2017, 12 (02)
[4]   Retrospective cohort study on patterns of care and outcomes of surgical treatment for lower urinarygenital tract fistula among English National Health Service hospitals between 2000 and 2009 [J].
Cromwell, David ;
Hilton, Paul .
BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2013, 111 (4B) :E257-E262
[5]   Ten-year experience with transvaginal vesicovaginal fistula repair using tissue interposition [J].
Eilber, KS ;
Kavaler, E ;
Rodríguez, LV ;
Rosenblum, N ;
Raz, S .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 169 (03) :1033-1036
[6]  
Farid FN, 2013, JCPSP-J COLL PHYSICI, V23, P828, DOI 11.2013/JCPSP.828829
[7]   The choice of surgical approach in the treatment of vesico-vaginal fistulae [J].
Hillary, Christopher J. ;
Chapple, Christoper R. .
ASIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 5 (03) :155-159
[8]   Management of vesicovaginal fistula: An experience of 52 cases with a rationalized algorithm for choosing the transvaginal or transabdominal approach [J].
Kapoor, Rakesh ;
Ansari, M. S. ;
Singh, Pratipal ;
Gupta, Parag ;
Khurana, Naval ;
Mandhani, Anil ;
Dubey, Deepak ;
Srivastava, Aneesh ;
Kumar, Anant .
INDIAN JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2007, 23 (04) :372-376
[9]  
Kumar S, 2017, J TURK-GER GYNECOL A, V18, P15, DOI 10.4274/jtgga.2016.0211
[10]   Management of genitourinary fistula [J].
Mellano, Erin M. ;
Tarnay, Christopher M. .
CURRENT OPINION IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2014, 26 (05) :415-423