MRI for characterization of primary tumors in the non-cirrhotic liver: Added value of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced hepatospecific phase

被引:7
作者
Donati, Olivio F. [1 ]
Hunziker, Roger [1 ]
Fischer, Michael A. [1 ]
Raptis, Dimitri A. [2 ]
Breitenstein, Stefan [2 ]
Patak, Michael A. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Zurich Hosp, Inst Diagnost & Intervent Radiol, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[2] Univ Zurich Hosp, Swiss Hepatopancreatobiliary HPB Ctr, Dept Visceral & Transplant Surg, CH-8091 Zurich, Switzerland
[3] Hirslanden Hosp Grp, Clin Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland
关键词
Liver tumor; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gd-EOB-DTPA; Hepatospecific; Contrast media; FOCAL NODULAR HYPERPLASIA; HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA; SPIRAL CT; MALIGNANT-TRANSFORMATION; HISTOPATHOLOGIC FINDINGS; PROTOCOL OPTIMIZATION; HEPATIC METASTASES; LESION APPEARANCE; ADENOMA; DIAGNOSIS;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.03.020
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the added value of hepatospecific phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with primary tumors in non-cirrhotic liver. Methods: Twenty-nine patients (median, 39 years; range, 18-81 years; 11 male) underwent preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI including hepatospecific phase after 10 and 20 min of contrast injection at four institutions in Europe, North America and New Zealand. Images were evaluated by three different readers (R1-R3) who characterized liver tumors with and without consultation of the hepatospecific phase images. Confidence in diagnosis was scored on a visual analog scale from 1 to 10. Histopathology( adenoma, n = 5; focal nodular hyperplasia, n = 11 and hepatocellular carcinoma, n = 13) in all patients served as the standard of reference. Differences were evaluated using the McNemar and Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Without hepatospecific phase images available, 22 (76%), 19 (66%) and 19 (66%) of 29 tumors were characterized correctly by the three readers respectively. Mean confidence in diagnosis was 6.1, 5.7 and 5.8. With the hepatospecific phase included, characterization of liver tumors did not change significantly with 21 (72%), 23 (79%) and 19 (66%) of 29 tumors diagnosed correctly (p > 0.05). According confidence ratings increased to 6.3, 6.5 and 7.7, respectively. Increase in diagnostic confidence was significant for R2 and R3 (p < 0.05) and independent of reader's experience. Conclusion: The additional hepatospecific phase in Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI did not significantly increase diagnostic accuracy in characterization of primary tumors in the non-cirrhotic liver. However, 2/3 readers showed a significant increase in diagnostic confidence after consultation of the hepatospecific phase. (C) 2014 Published by Elsevier Ireland Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1074 / 1079
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Clinical value of MRI liver-specific contrast agents: a tailored examination for a confident non-invasive diagnosis of focal liver lesions [J].
Ba-Ssalamah, Ahmed ;
Uffmann, Martin ;
Saini, Sanjai ;
Bastati, Nina ;
Herold, Christian ;
Schima, Wolfgang .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2009, 19 (02) :342-357
[2]   Detection and classification of different liver lesions: Comparison of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI versus multiphasic spiral CT in a clinica single centre investigation [J].
Boettcher, Joachim ;
Hansch, Andreas ;
Pfeil, Alexander ;
Schmidt, Peter ;
Malich, Ansgar ;
Schneeweiss, Albrecht ;
Maurer, Martin H. ;
Streitparth, Florian ;
Teichgraeber, Ulf K. ;
Renze, Diane M. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (11) :1860-1869
[3]   Management of Benign Hepatic Tumors [J].
Buell, Joseph F. ;
Tranchart, Hadrien ;
Cannon, Robert ;
Dagher, Ibrahim .
SURGICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2010, 90 (04) :719-+
[4]   Surgical management of hepatocellular adenoma: Take it or leave it? [J].
Cho, Sung W. ;
Marsh, J. Wallis ;
Steel, Jennifer ;
Holloway, Shane E. ;
Heckman, Jason T. ;
Ochoa, Erin R. ;
Geller, David A. ;
Gamblin, T. Clark .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2008, 15 (10) :2795-2803
[5]  
Choi BY, 2005, J CLIN GASTROENTEROL, V39, P401, DOI 10.1097/01.mcg.0000159226.63037.a2
[6]   Gadoxetate Disodium-Enhanced MRI of the Liver: Part 2, Protocol Optimization and Lesion Appearance in the Cirrhotic Liver [J].
Cruite, Irene ;
Schroeder, Michael ;
Merkle, Elmar M. ;
Sirlin, Claude B. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2010, 195 (01) :29-41
[7]   Liver Cell Adenoma: A Multicenter Analysis of Risk Factors for Rupture and Malignancy [J].
Deneve, Jeremiah L. ;
Pawlik, Timothy M. ;
Cunningham, Steve ;
Clary, Bryan ;
Reddy, Srinevas ;
Scoggins, Charles R. ;
Martin, Robert C. G. ;
D'Angelica, Michael ;
Staley, Charles A. ;
Choti, Michael A. ;
Jarnagin, William R. ;
Schulick, Richard D. ;
Kooby, David A. .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2009, 16 (03) :640-648
[8]   Accuracy and confidence of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging alone and in combination for the diagnosis of liver metastases [J].
Donati, Olivio F. ;
Fischer, Michael A. ;
Chuck, Natalie ;
Hunziker, Roger ;
Weishaupt, Dominik ;
Reiner, Caecilia S. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2013, 82 (05) :822-828
[9]   Malignant Transformation of Liver Adenoma: An Analysis of the Literature [J].
Farges, Olivier ;
Dokmak, Safi .
DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2010, 27 (01) :32-38
[10]   Paradoxic uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA by hepatocellular carcinoma in mice: Quantitative image analysis [J].
Fujita, M ;
Yamamoto, R ;
Takahashi, M ;
Tsuji, T ;
Yamanaka, T ;
Miyazawa, T ;
FritzZieroth, B ;
Terada, N ;
Kuroda, C .
JMRI-JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 7 (04) :768-770