Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources

被引:24
作者
Rapa, Mattia [1 ]
Gobbi, Laura [1 ]
Ruggieri, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Management, Via Castro Laurenziano 9, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
electric vehicles; sustainability; life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; electric mobility; cumulative energy demand; carbon footprint; CUMULATIVE ENERGY DEMAND; PLUG-IN HYBRID; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LITHIUM-ION; BATTERY; LCA; STRATEGIES; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.3390/en13236292
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electro-mobility of vehicles could solve the negative effects of road transport, by decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. However, some electric vehicles also have a negative impact on the environment related to the nature of electricity used. This paper aims to evaluate the electricity sources for electric vehicles using a Life Cycle Thinking approach. Life cycle assessment, using several midpoints and endpoint methods, highlighted that the most damaging sources were lignite and diesel, while hydropower, wind, and biomass were the most sustainable ones. Cumulative energy demand showed that biomass used the least energy (0.034 MJ eq.), but originates from 100% non-renewable sources. Lignite, which also comes from 100% non-renewable sources, used the most energy (17.791 MJ eq.). The lowest carbon footprints were for wind, biomass, and photovoltaic (<0.1 kg CO2 eq). Municipal waste incineration and natural gas had a medium impact, while lignite, coal, peat, and diesel had a high impact (>1.0 kg CO2 eq.). Considering life cycle costing, photovoltaic electricity generation was the most expensive (0.2107 USD/kWh) while natural gas the cheapest (0.0661 USD/kWh). Therefore, this study presents an integrated approach that may offer a valid tool for decision-makers, giving them the possibility to choose the electricity sources for electric vehicles.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[21]  
Huijbregts M., 2016, ReCiPe 2016
[22]   ReCiPe2016: a harmonised life cycle impact assessment method at midpoint and endpoint level [J].
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ;
Steinmann, Zoran J. N. ;
Elshout, Pieter M. F. ;
Stam, Gea ;
Verones, Francesca ;
Vieira, Marisa ;
Zijp, Michiel ;
Hollander, Anne ;
van Zelm, Rosalie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (02) :138-147
[23]   Cumulative Energy Demand As Predictor for the Environmental Burden of Commodity Production [J].
Huijbregts, Mark A. J. ;
Hellweg, Stefanie ;
Frischknecht, Rolf ;
Hendriks, Harrie W. M. ;
Hungerbuehler, Konrad ;
Hendriks, A. Jan .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 44 (06) :2189-2196
[24]  
Hunkeler D., 2008, Environmental Life Cycle Costing
[25]   IMPACT 2002+: A new life cycle impact assessment methodology [J].
Jolliet, O ;
Margni, M ;
Charles, R ;
Humbert, S ;
Payet, J ;
Rebitzer, G ;
Rosenbaum, R .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2003, 8 (06) :324-330
[26]   Environmental Impacts of Integrated Photovoltaic Modules in Light Utility Electric Vehicles [J].
Kanz, Olga ;
Reinders, Angele ;
May, Johanna ;
Ding, Kaining .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (19)
[27]   Life cycle costing: a review of published case studies [J].
Korpi, Eric ;
Ala-Risku, Timo .
MANAGERIAL AUDITING JOURNAL, 2008, 23 (03) :240-+
[28]  
Langdon D., 2007, COMMON EUROPEAN METH, P43
[29]   Energy Security Pattern Spatiotemporal Evolution and Strategic Analysis of G20 Countries [J].
Li, Jinchao ;
Wang, Lina ;
Li, Tianzhi ;
Zhu, Shaowen .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2019, 11 (06)
[30]   Comparative environmental assessment of conventional, electric, hybrid, and fuel cell powertrains based on LCA [J].
Lombardi, Lidia ;
Tribioli, Laura ;
Cozzolino, Raffaello ;
Bella, Gino .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2017, 22 (12) :1989-2006