Environmental and Economic Sustainability of Electric Vehicles: Life Cycle Assessment and Life Cycle Costing Evaluation of Electricity Sources

被引:24
作者
Rapa, Mattia [1 ]
Gobbi, Laura [1 ]
Ruggieri, Roberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Management, Via Castro Laurenziano 9, I-00161 Rome, Italy
关键词
electric vehicles; sustainability; life cycle assessment; life cycle costing; electric mobility; cumulative energy demand; carbon footprint; CUMULATIVE ENERGY DEMAND; PLUG-IN HYBRID; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CO2; EMISSIONS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; LITHIUM-ION; BATTERY; LCA; STRATEGIES; TRANSPORT;
D O I
10.3390/en13236292
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
The electro-mobility of vehicles could solve the negative effects of road transport, by decreasing greenhouse gas emissions. However, some electric vehicles also have a negative impact on the environment related to the nature of electricity used. This paper aims to evaluate the electricity sources for electric vehicles using a Life Cycle Thinking approach. Life cycle assessment, using several midpoints and endpoint methods, highlighted that the most damaging sources were lignite and diesel, while hydropower, wind, and biomass were the most sustainable ones. Cumulative energy demand showed that biomass used the least energy (0.034 MJ eq.), but originates from 100% non-renewable sources. Lignite, which also comes from 100% non-renewable sources, used the most energy (17.791 MJ eq.). The lowest carbon footprints were for wind, biomass, and photovoltaic (<0.1 kg CO2 eq). Municipal waste incineration and natural gas had a medium impact, while lignite, coal, peat, and diesel had a high impact (>1.0 kg CO2 eq.). Considering life cycle costing, photovoltaic electricity generation was the most expensive (0.2107 USD/kWh) while natural gas the cheapest (0.0661 USD/kWh). Therefore, this study presents an integrated approach that may offer a valid tool for decision-makers, giving them the possibility to choose the electricity sources for electric vehicles.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]   Sustainable energy towards air pollution and climate change mitigation [J].
Adedeji, Adedayo Rasak ;
Zaini, Fauzi ;
Mathew, Sathyajith ;
Dagar, Lalit ;
Petra, Mohammad Iskandar ;
De Silva, Liyanage C. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2020, 260
[2]   Climate change communicators' carbon footprints affect their audience's policy support [J].
Attari, Shahzeen Z. ;
Krantz, David H. ;
Weber, Elke U. .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2019, 154 (3-4) :529-545
[3]   Prospective cost and environmental impact assessment of battery and fuel cell electric vehicles in Germany [J].
Bekel, Kai ;
Pauliuk, Stefan .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LIFE CYCLE ASSESSMENT, 2019, 24 (12) :2220-2237
[4]   Hemp Seed Production: Environmental Impacts ofCannabis sativaL. Agronomic Practices by Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) and Carbon Footprint Methodologies [J].
Campiglia, Enio ;
Gobbi, Laura ;
Marucci, Alvaro ;
Rapa, Mattia ;
Ruggieri, Roberto ;
Vinci, Giuliana .
SUSTAINABILITY, 2020, 12 (16)
[5]  
Caro D., 2018, ENCY ECOLOGY
[6]   Energy and environmental assessment of a traction lithium-ion battery pack for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles [J].
Cusenza, Maria Anna ;
Bobba, Silvia ;
Ardente, Fulvio ;
Cellura, Maurizio ;
Di Persio, Franco .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 215 :634-649
[7]   Global Energy Consumption in a Warming Climate [J].
De Cian, Enrica ;
Wing, Ian Sue .
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS, 2019, 72 (02) :365-410
[8]  
De Moraes Paulo J. U., 2013, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, V15, P1350001, DOI 10.1142/S1464333213500014
[9]  
Dealy J. M., 1980, AICHE J, V26, P174, DOI [10.1002/aic.690260138, DOI 10.1002/AIC.690260138]
[10]   An evaluation of environmental sustainability in the food industry through Life Cycle Assessment: the case study of tomato products supply chain [J].
Del Borghi, A. ;
Gallo, M. ;
Strazza, C. ;
Del Borghi, M. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2014, 78 :121-130