Meta-ethnography 25 years on: challenges and insights for synthesising a large number of qualitative studies

被引:215
作者
Toye, Francine [1 ]
Seers, Kate [2 ]
Allcock, Nick [3 ]
Briggs, Michelle [4 ]
Carr, Eloise [5 ]
Barker, Karen [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oxford, Hosp NHS Trust, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford, England
[2] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Royal Coll Nursing Res Inst, Coventry CV4 7AL, W Midlands, England
[3] Glasgow Caledonian Univ, Sch Life & Hlth Sci, Glasgow G4 0BA, Lanark, Scotland
[4] Leeds Metropolitan Univ, Inst Hlth & Well Being, Leeds LS1 3HE, W Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Calgary, Fac Nursing, Calgary, AB, Canada
[6] Univ Oxford, Nuffield Dept Orthopaed, Biomed Res Unit, Oxford OX3 7LD, England
关键词
OPTIMAL SEARCH STRATEGIES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1186/1471-2288-14-80
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Studies that systematically search for and synthesise qualitative research are becoming more evident in health care, and they can make an important contribution to patient care. Our team was funded to complete a meta-ethnography of patients' experience of chronic musculoskeletal pain. It has been 25 years since Noblit and Hare published their core text on meta-ethnography, and the current health research environment brings additional challenges to researchers aiming to synthesise qualitative research. Noblit and Hare propose seven stages of meta-ethnography which take the researcher from formulating a research idea to expressing the findings. These stages are not discrete but form part of an iterative research process. We aimed to build on the methods of Noblit and Hare and explore the challenges of including a large number of qualitative studies into a qualitative systematic review. These challenges hinge upon epistemological and practical issues to be considered alongside expectations about what determines high quality research. This paper describes our method and explores these challenges. Central to our method was the process of collaborative interpretation of concepts and the decision to exclude original material where we could not decipher a concept. We use excerpts from our research team's reflexive statements to illustrate the development of our methods.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital
[2]  
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DB SYST REV
[3]  
[Anonymous], HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, National Centre for Research Methods Review Paper
[5]  
[Anonymous], NVIVO QUAL DAT AN SO
[6]   Conducting a meta-ethnography of qualitative literature: Lessons learnt [J].
Atkins, Salla ;
Lewin, Simon ;
Smith, Helen ;
Engel, Mark ;
Fretheim, Atle ;
Volmink, Jimmy .
BMC MEDICAL RESEARCH METHODOLOGY, 2008, 8 (1)
[7]  
Barnett-Page E, 2009, METHODS RES SYNTHESI
[8]   WHAT IS WRONG WITH SOCIAL THEORY? [J].
Blumer, Herbert .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1954, 19 (01) :3-10
[9]   Effective implementation of research into practice: An overview of systematic reviews of the health literature [J].
Boaz A. ;
Baeza J. ;
Fraser A. .
BMC Research Notes, 4 (1)
[10]   Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care [J].
Campbell, R ;
Pound, P ;
Pope, C ;
Britten, N ;
Pill, R ;
Morgan, M ;
Donovan, J .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2003, 56 (04) :671-684