Argument annotation and analysis using deep learning with attention mechanism in Bahasa Indonesia

被引:4
作者
Suhartono, Derwin [1 ]
Gema, Aryo Pradipta [1 ]
Winton, Suhendro [1 ]
David, Theodorus [1 ]
Fanany, Mohamad Ivan [2 ]
Arymurthy, Aniati Murni [2 ]
机构
[1] Bina Nusantara Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Dept Comp Sci, Jakarta 11480, Indonesia
[2] Univ Indonesia, Machine Learning & Comp Vis Lab, Fac Comp Sci, Depok 16424, Indonesia
关键词
Argument annotation; Argument analysis; Deep learning; Attention mechanism; Bahasa Indonesia;
D O I
10.1186/s40537-020-00364-z
中图分类号
TP301 [理论、方法];
学科分类号
081202 ;
摘要
Argumentation mining is a research field which focuses on sentences in type of argumentation. Argumentative sentences are often used in daily communication and have important role in each decision or conclusion making process. The research objective is to do observation in deep learning utilization combined with attention mechanism for argument annotation and analysis. Argument annotation is argument component classification from certain discourse to several classes. Classes include major claim, claim, premise and non-argumentative. Argument analysis points to argumentation characteristics and validity which are arranged into one topic. One of the analysis is about how to assess whether an established argument is categorized as sufficient or not. Dataset used for argument annotation and analysis is 402 persuasive essays. This data is translated into Bahasa Indonesia (mother tongue of Indonesia) to give overview about how it works with specific language other than English. Several deep learning models such as CNN (Convolutional Neural Network), LSTM (Long Short-Term Memory), and GRU (Gated Recurrent Unit) are utilized for argument annotation and analysis while HAN (Hierarchical Attention Network) is utilized only for argument analysis. Attention mechanism is combined with the model as weighted access setter for a better performance. From the whole experiments, combination of deep learning and attention mechanism for argument annotation and analysis arrives in a better result compared with previous research.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Addawood A.A., 2016, Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Argument Mining (ArgMining2016), P1, DOI [DOI 10.18653/V1/W16-2801, 10.18653/v1/W16-2801]
  • [2] Aharoni Ehud, 2014, ARGMINING ACL, P64
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2007, Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, DOI DOI 10.1145/1276318.1276362
  • [4] Bar-Haim R, 2016, P 15 C EUR CHAPT ASS, V1, P251
  • [5] Bilu Yonatan, 2015, P 2 WORKSH ARG MIN, P84
  • [6] Boltuic Filip., 2016, P 3 WORKSH ARG MIN A, P124
  • [7] Cabrio Elena, 2012, Proceedings of the 50th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 2: Short Papers), V2, P208
  • [8] Chakrabarty Tuhin, 2019, P 2019 C EMPIRICAL M, P2933
  • [9] Automatic Debate Text Summarization in Online Debate Forum
    Chowanda, Alan Darmasaputra
    Sanyoto, Albert Richard
    Suhartono, Derwin
    Setiadi, Criscentia Jessica
    [J]. DISCOVERY AND INNOVATION OF COMPUTER SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY IN ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE ERA, 2017, 116 : 11 - 19
  • [10] Chung JY, 2015, PR MACH LEARN RES, V37, P2067