Benefits of Independent Double Reading in Digital Mammography: A Theoretical Evaluation of All Possible Pairing Methodologies

被引:23
作者
Brennan, Patrick C. [1 ]
Ganesan, Aarthi [1 ]
Eckstein, Miguel P. [2 ,3 ]
Ekpo, Ernest Usang [1 ]
Tapia, Kriscia [1 ]
Mello-Thoms, Claudia [1 ]
Lewis, Sarah [1 ]
Juni, Mordechai Z. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Fac Hlth Sci, Med Image Optimisat & Percept Grp MIOPeG, Med Imaging & Radiat Sci,Fac Res Grp, Cumberland Campus,75 East St, Lidcombe, NSW 2141, Australia
[2] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Dept Psychol & Brain Sci, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
[3] Univ Calif Santa Barbara, Inst Collaborat Biotechnol, Santa Barbara, CA 93106 USA
关键词
Radiologists; Digital mammography; Observer variation; Double reading; Breast cancer; SCREENING MAMMOGRAMS; CANCER-DETECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2018.06.017
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Rationale and Objectives: To establish the efficacy of pairing readers randomly and evaluate the merits of developing optimal pairing methodologies. Materials and Methods: Sensitivity, specificity, and proportion correct were computed for three different case sets that were independently read by 16 radiologists. Performance of radiologists as single readers was compared to expected double reading performance. We theoretically evaluated all possible pairing methodologies. Bootstrap resampling methods were used for statistical analyses. Results: Significant improvements in expected performance for double versus single reading (ie, delta performance) were shown for all performance measures and case-sets (p <= .003), with overall delta performance across all theoretically possible pairing schemes (n = 10,395) ranging between .05 and .08. Delta performance for the 20 best pairing schemes was significant (p < .001) and ranged between .07 and .10. Delta performance for 20 random pairing schemes was also significant (p <= .003) and ranged between .05 and .08. Delta performance for the 20 worst pairing schemes ranged between .03 and .06, reaching significance in delta proportion correct (p <= .021) for all three case-sets and in delta specificity for two case-sets (p <= .033) but not for a third case-set (p = .131), and not reaching significance in delta sensitivity for any of the three case-sets (.098 >= p >= .067). Conclusion: Significant benefits accrue from double reading, and while random reader pairing achieves most double reading benefits, a strategic pairing approach may maximize the benefits of double reading.
引用
收藏
页码:717 / 723
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   THE EFFICACY OF DOUBLE READING MAMMOGRAMS IN BREAST SCREENING [J].
ANDERSON, EDC ;
MUIR, BB ;
WALSH, JS ;
KIRKPATRICK, AE .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 1994, 49 (04) :248-251
[2]   Is single reading with computer-aided detection (CAD) as good as double reading in mammography screening? A systematic review [J].
Azavedo, Edward ;
Zackrisson, Sophia ;
Mejare, Ingegerd ;
Arnlind, Marianne Heibert .
BMC MEDICAL IMAGING, 2012, 12
[3]   CONTROLLING THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE - A PRACTICAL AND POWERFUL APPROACH TO MULTIPLE TESTING [J].
BENJAMINI, Y ;
HOCHBERG, Y .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1995, 57 (01) :289-300
[4]  
BreastScreen Australia National Accreditation Guidelines, 2008, BREASTSCREEN AUSTR N, P42
[5]   Second reading of screening mammograms increases cancer detection and recall rates. Results in the Florence screening programme [J].
Ciatto, S ;
Ambrogetti, D ;
Bonardi, R ;
Catarzi, S ;
Risso, G ;
Del Turco, MR ;
Mantellini, P .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2005, 12 (02) :103-106
[6]   Independant double reading of screening mammograms in the Netherlands: Effect of arbitration following reader disagreements [J].
Duijm, LEM ;
Groenewoud, JH ;
Hendriks, JHCL ;
de Koning, HJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 231 (02) :564-570
[7]  
Efron B., 1993, An introduction to the bootstrap, V1st ed.
[8]  
Ekpo Ernest Usang, 2018, Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, V19, P291, DOI 10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.2.291
[9]   Comparison of computer-aided detection to double reading of screening mammograms: Review of 231,221 mammograms [J].
Gromet, Matthew .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2008, 190 (04) :854-859
[10]   Breast screening using 2D-mammography or integrating digital breast tomosynthesis (3D-mammography) for single-reading or double-reading - Evidence to guide future screening strategies [J].
Houssami, Nehmat ;
Macaskill, Petra ;
Bernardi, Daniela ;
Caumo, Francesca ;
Pellegrini, Marco ;
Brunelli, Silvia ;
Tuttobene, Paola ;
Bricolo, Paola ;
Fanto, Carmine ;
Valentini, Marvi ;
Ciatto, Stefano .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2014, 50 (10) :1799-1807