Low-Dose Aspirin and Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Primary Versus Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention A Population-Based, Nested Case-Control Study

被引:18
作者
Lin, Kueiyu Joshua [1 ]
De Caterina, Raffaele [2 ,3 ]
Garcia Rodriguez, Luis A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[2] Univ G DAnnunzio, Inst Cardiol, Chieti, Italy
[3] Univ G DAnnunzio, Ctr Excellence Aging, Chieti, Italy
[4] Spanish Ctr Pharmacoepidemiol Res CEIFE, Madrid, Spain
来源
CIRCULATION-CARDIOVASCULAR QUALITY AND OUTCOMES | 2014年 / 7卷 / 01期
关键词
angina unstable; aspirin; myocardial infarction; peripheral arterial disease; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; DISEASE; RISK; COMPLICATIONS; EVENTS; USERS;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.113.000494
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background The benefit-risk profile of low-dose aspirin in primary prevention of cardiovascular disease is unclear. We sought to quantify upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) risk associated with low-dose aspirin in secondary versus primary prevention patients. Methods and Results We performed a population-based nested case-control study using The Health Improvement Network (THIN) Database between 2000 and 2007. We identified 2049 cases of UGIB and 20 000 controls, frequency-matched to the cases on age, sex, and calendar year, who were subdivided into primary (without previous cardiovascular disease) and secondary (with previous cardiovascular disease) prevention populations. We estimated the relative risk of UGIB associated with the use of low-dose aspirin by multivariate logistic regression. The UGIB risk in patients taking low-dose aspirin relative to nonusers was significantly higher in the primary (adjusted relative risk, 1.90; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.26) than in the secondary (relative risk, 1.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.14-1.72; P value for the difference=0.0014) prevention cohort. However, as the baseline risk of UGIB was lower in the primary than in the secondary prevention cohort, numbers needed to harm per 1 year of low-dose aspirin use were 601 and 391 for primary and secondary prevention, respectively. Conclusions The relative risk of UGIB in patients taking low-dose aspirin is higher when used for primary than for secondary cardiovascular disease prevention, but this difference is more than compensated by the lower baseline risk in the primary prevention population. Such estimates are important for an assessment of the net clinical benefit in primary prevention.
引用
收藏
页码:70 / 77
页数:8
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2010, MULTILEX PRIM CAR
[2]  
Baigent C, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V324, P71, DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
[3]   Low-dose aspirin in patients with stable cardiovascular disease: A meta-analysis [J].
Berger, Jeffrey S. ;
Brown, David L. ;
Becker, Richard C. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2008, 121 (01) :43-49
[4]   Aspirin for the primary prevention of cardiovascular events in women and men - A sex-specific meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Berger, JS ;
Roncaglioni, MC ;
Avanzini, F ;
Pangrazzi, I ;
Tognoni, G ;
Brown, DL .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2006, 295 (03) :306-313
[5]  
Blak Betina T, 2011, Inform Prim Care, V19, P251
[6]  
Bourke Alison, 2004, Inform Prim Care, V12, P171
[7]  
Calonge N, 2009, ANN INTERN MED, V150, P396
[8]  
Collins R, 2009, LANCET, V373, P1849, DOI 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60503-1
[9]  
de Abajo F J, 2001, BMC Clin Pharmacol, V1, P1, DOI 10.1186/1472-6904-1-1
[10]   ISCHEMIC-HEART-DISEASE AND PLATELET-AGGREGATION - THE CAERPHILLY COLLABORATIVE HEART-DISEASE STUDY [J].
ELWOOD, PC ;
RENAUD, S ;
SHARP, DS ;
BESWICK, AD ;
OBRIEN, JR ;
YARNELL, JWG .
CIRCULATION, 1991, 83 (01) :38-44