Portfolio value-at-risk with heavy-tailed risk factors

被引:125
|
作者
Glasserman, P
Heidelberger, P
Shahabuddin, P
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] IBM Corp, Div Res, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Operat Res, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
value-at-risk; delta-gamma approximation; Monte Carlo; simulation; variance reduction; importance sampling; stratified sampling; conditional excess; conditional value-at-risk;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9965.00141
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper develops efficient methods for computing portfolio value-at-risk (VAR) when the underlying risk factors have a heavy-tailed distribution. In modeling heavy tails, we focus on multivariate t distributions and some extensions thereof. We develop two methods for VAR calculation that exploit a quadratic approximation to the portfolio loss, such as the delta-gamma approximation. In the first method, we derive the characteristic function of the quadratic approximation and then use numerical transform inversion to approximate the portfolio loss distribution. Because the quadratic approximation may not always yield accurate VAR estimates, we also develop a low variance Monte Carlo method. This method uses the quadratic approximation to guide the selection of an effective importance sampling distribution that samples risk factors so that large losses occur more often. Variance is further reduced by combining the importance sampling with stratified sampling. Numerical results on a variety of test portfolios indicate that large variance reductions are typically obtained. Both methods developed in this paper overcome difficulties associated with VAR calculation with heavy-tailed risk factors. The Monte Carlo method also extends to the problem of estimating the conditional excess, sometimes known as the conditional VAR.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 269
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Fuzzy Portfolio Selection based on Index Tracking and Value-at-Risk
    Xing, Qianli
    Wang, Bo
    Watada, Junzo
    INTELLIGENT DECISION TECHNOLOGIES, 2013, 255 : 225 - 234
  • [42] Value-at-Risk Based Portfolio Management in Electric Power Sector
    Shi, Ran
    Zhong, Jin
    WMSCI 2008: 12TH WORLD MULTI-CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMICS, CYBERNETICS AND INFORMATICS, VOL VI, PROCEEDINGS, 2008, : 249 - 253
  • [43] Uncertain random portfolio optimization models based on value-at-risk
    Qin, Zhongfeng
    Dai, Yuanzhen
    Zheng, Haitao
    JOURNAL OF INTELLIGENT & FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2017, 32 (06) : 4523 - 4531
  • [44] Kernel quantile estimators for nested simulation with application to portfolio value-at-risk measurement
    Liu, Xiaoyu
    Yan, Xing
    Zhang, Kun
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2024, 312 (03) : 1168 - 1177
  • [45] Portfolio Optimization with Reward-Risk Ratio Measure based on the Conditional Value-at-Risk
    Ogryczak, Wlodzimierz
    Przyluski, Michal
    Sliwinski, Tomasz
    WORLD CONGRESS ON ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE, WCECS 2015, VOL II, 2015, : 913 - +
  • [46] Estimating hedged portfolio value-at-risk using the conditional copula: An illustration of model risk
    Chen, Yi-Hsuan
    Tu, Anthony H.
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF ECONOMICS & FINANCE, 2013, 27 : 514 - 528
  • [47] Portfolio value-at-risk forecasting with GA-based extreme value theory
    Lin, Ping-Chen
    Ko, Po-Chang
    EXPERT SYSTEMS WITH APPLICATIONS, 2009, 36 (02) : 2503 - 2512
  • [48] Analyzing Stock Performance in the Banking Sector: Unveiling Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk Strategies
    Witayakiattilerd, Wichai
    Reunprot, Natthaphon
    Limpanawannakul, Wachirada
    Phuphon, Jirawan
    THAILAND STATISTICIAN, 2024, 22 (04): : 877 - 893
  • [49] MONTE CARLO ESTIMATION OF VALUE-AT-RISK, CONDITIONAL VALUE-AT-RISK AND THEIR SENSITIVITIES
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Liu, Guangwu
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2011 WINTER SIMULATION CONFERENCE (WSC), 2011, : 95 - 107
  • [50] Improving Hull and White's Method of Estimating Portfolio Value-at-Risk
    Changchien, Chang-Cheng
    Lin, Chu-Hsiung
    Yang, Hsien-Chueh Peter
    JOURNAL OF FORECASTING, 2012, 31 (08) : 706 - 720