Portfolio value-at-risk with heavy-tailed risk factors

被引:125
|
作者
Glasserman, P
Heidelberger, P
Shahabuddin, P
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] IBM Corp, Div Res, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Operat Res, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
value-at-risk; delta-gamma approximation; Monte Carlo; simulation; variance reduction; importance sampling; stratified sampling; conditional excess; conditional value-at-risk;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9965.00141
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper develops efficient methods for computing portfolio value-at-risk (VAR) when the underlying risk factors have a heavy-tailed distribution. In modeling heavy tails, we focus on multivariate t distributions and some extensions thereof. We develop two methods for VAR calculation that exploit a quadratic approximation to the portfolio loss, such as the delta-gamma approximation. In the first method, we derive the characteristic function of the quadratic approximation and then use numerical transform inversion to approximate the portfolio loss distribution. Because the quadratic approximation may not always yield accurate VAR estimates, we also develop a low variance Monte Carlo method. This method uses the quadratic approximation to guide the selection of an effective importance sampling distribution that samples risk factors so that large losses occur more often. Variance is further reduced by combining the importance sampling with stratified sampling. Numerical results on a variety of test portfolios indicate that large variance reductions are typically obtained. Both methods developed in this paper overcome difficulties associated with VAR calculation with heavy-tailed risk factors. The Monte Carlo method also extends to the problem of estimating the conditional excess, sometimes known as the conditional VAR.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 269
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Forecasting Value-at-Risk under Temporal and Portfolio Aggregation*
    Kole, Erik
    Markwat, Thijs
    Opschoor, Anne
    van Dijk, Dick
    JOURNAL OF FINANCIAL ECONOMETRICS, 2017, 15 (04) : 649 - 677
  • [32] Upper bounds on value-at-risk for the maximum portfolio loss
    Robert Yuen
    Stilian Stoev
    Extremes, 2014, 17 : 585 - 614
  • [33] Conditional value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: Coherent but fragile
    Lim, Andrew E. B.
    Shanthikumar, J. George
    Vahn, Gah-Yi
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2011, 39 (03) : 163 - 171
  • [34] Stability analysis of portfolio management with conditional value-at-risk
    Kaut, Michal
    Vladimirou, Hercules
    Wallace, Stein W.
    Zenios, Stavros A.
    QUANTITATIVE FINANCE, 2007, 7 (04) : 397 - 409
  • [35] Comment on "optimal portfolio selection in a value-at-risk framework"
    Huang, HH
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2005, 29 (12) : 3181 - 3185
  • [36] Constructing a Risky Optimal Mean/Value-at-Risk Portfolio
    Kritski, O. L.
    Belsner, O. A.
    GLOBAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT: TRANSITION TO ECONOMY 4.0, 2019, : 103 - 111
  • [37] Mean Conditional Value-at-Risk Model for Portfolio Optimization
    Gao, Jianwei
    Liu, Lufang
    2009 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON BUSINESS INTELLIGENCE AND FINANCIAL ENGINEERING, PROCEEDINGS, 2009, : 246 - 250
  • [38] Upper bounds on value-at-risk for the maximum portfolio loss
    Yuen, Robert
    Stoev, Stilian
    EXTREMES, 2014, 17 (04) : 585 - 614
  • [39] Estimating Portfolio of Bonds Credit Risk Value-at-Risk Based on Copula Function
    Bi Tao
    Zhang Xiaofei
    RECENT ADVANCE IN STATISTICS APPLICATION AND RELATED AREAS, PTS 1 AND 2, 2008, : 1093 - 1097
  • [40] Application of the Beck model to stock markets: Value-at-Risk and portfolio risk assessment
    Kozaki, M.
    Sato, A. -H.
    PHYSICA A-STATISTICAL MECHANICS AND ITS APPLICATIONS, 2008, 387 (5-6) : 1225 - 1246