Portfolio value-at-risk with heavy-tailed risk factors

被引:125
|
作者
Glasserman, P
Heidelberger, P
Shahabuddin, P
机构
[1] Columbia Univ, Grad Sch Business, New York, NY 10027 USA
[2] IBM Corp, Div Res, Yorktown Hts, NY 10598 USA
[3] Columbia Univ, Dept Ind Engn & Operat Res, New York, NY 10027 USA
关键词
value-at-risk; delta-gamma approximation; Monte Carlo; simulation; variance reduction; importance sampling; stratified sampling; conditional excess; conditional value-at-risk;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9965.00141
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper develops efficient methods for computing portfolio value-at-risk (VAR) when the underlying risk factors have a heavy-tailed distribution. In modeling heavy tails, we focus on multivariate t distributions and some extensions thereof. We develop two methods for VAR calculation that exploit a quadratic approximation to the portfolio loss, such as the delta-gamma approximation. In the first method, we derive the characteristic function of the quadratic approximation and then use numerical transform inversion to approximate the portfolio loss distribution. Because the quadratic approximation may not always yield accurate VAR estimates, we also develop a low variance Monte Carlo method. This method uses the quadratic approximation to guide the selection of an effective importance sampling distribution that samples risk factors so that large losses occur more often. Variance is further reduced by combining the importance sampling with stratified sampling. Numerical results on a variety of test portfolios indicate that large variance reductions are typically obtained. Both methods developed in this paper overcome difficulties associated with VAR calculation with heavy-tailed risk factors. The Monte Carlo method also extends to the problem of estimating the conditional excess, sometimes known as the conditional VAR.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 269
页数:31
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Estimating allocations for Value-at-Risk portfolio optimization
    Arthur Charpentier
    Abder Oulidi
    Mathematical Methods of Operations Research, 2009, 69
  • [22] Fuzzy Portfolio Selection based on Value-at-Risk
    Wang, Bo
    Wang, Shuming
    Watada, Junzo
    2009 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SYSTEMS, MAN AND CYBERNETICS (SMC 2009), VOLS 1-9, 2009, : 1840 - 1845
  • [23] The impact of liquidity on portfolio value-at-risk forecasts
    Hung, Jui-Cheng
    Su, Jung-Bin
    Chang, Matthew C.
    Wang, Yi-Hsien
    APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2020, 52 (03) : 242 - 259
  • [24] Nonlinear portfolio selection using approximate parametric Value-at-Risk
    Cui, Xueting
    Zhu, Shushang
    Sun, Xiaoling
    Li, Duan
    JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2013, 37 (06) : 2124 - 2139
  • [25] Asymptotic representations for importance-sampling estimators of value-at-risk and conditional value-at-risk
    Sun, Lihua
    Hong, L. Jeff
    OPERATIONS RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 38 (04) : 246 - 251
  • [26] Distributionally robust reinsurance with Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk
    Liu, Haiyan
    Mao, Tiantian
    INSURANCE MATHEMATICS & ECONOMICS, 2022, 107 : 393 - 417
  • [27] Encoded Value-at-Risk: A machine learning approach for portfolio risk measurement
    Arian, Hamid
    Moghimi, Mehrdad
    Tabatabaei, Ehsan
    Zamani, Shiva
    MATHEMATICS AND COMPUTERS IN SIMULATION, 2022, 202 : 500 - 525
  • [28] Conditional Value-at-Risk Approximation to Value-at-Risk Constrained Programs: A Remedy via Monte Carlo
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Hu, Zhaolin
    Zhang, Liwei
    INFORMS JOURNAL ON COMPUTING, 2014, 26 (02) : 385 - 400
  • [29] A New Heavy-Tailed Lomax Model With Characterizations, Applications, Peaks Over Random Threshold Value-at-Risk, and the Mean-of-Order-P Analysis
    Khan, M. I.
    Aljadani, Abdussalam
    Mansour, Mahmoud M.
    Abd Elrazik, Enayat M.
    Hamedani, G. G.
    Yousof, Haitham M.
    Shehata, Wahid A. M.
    JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICS, 2024, 2024
  • [30] Monte Carlo Methods for Value-at-Risk and Conditional Value-at-Risk: A Review
    Hong, L. Jeff
    Hu, Zhaolin
    Liu, Guangwu
    ACM TRANSACTIONS ON MODELING AND COMPUTER SIMULATION, 2014, 24 (04):