An In Vitro Comparison of Different Cementation Strategies on the Pull-out Strength of a Glass Fiber Post

被引:37
作者
Amaral, M. [3 ]
Santini, M. F. [3 ]
Wandscher, V. [3 ]
Amaral, R. [1 ]
Valandro, L. F. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sao Paulo State Univ, Sao Jose dos Campos Dent Sch, UNESP, Sao Jose Dos Campos, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Div Prosthodont, Dept Restorat Dent, BR-97119900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Santa Maria, Sch Dent, BR-97119900 Santa Maria, RS, Brazil
关键词
MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH; FINITE-ELEMENT ANALYSIS; REINFORCED COMPOSITE; CLINICAL-EVALUATION; CONTRACTION STRESS; CURED COMPOSITES; ADHESIVE SYSTEMS; RESIN CEMENT; ROOT DENTIN; CANAL WALLS;
D O I
10.2341/08-113
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of different strategies for post cementation on the pullout bond strength of a double-tapered glass fiber post cemented into a root canal. Materials and Methods: The root canals of 70 single-rooted bovine teeth (16 mm-length) were prepared to 9 mm using the preparation drill of a double-tapered glass fiber post system (White Post DC, FGM). Each specimen was embedded in a plastic cylinder using acrylic resin up to 3 mm. of the most coronal portion of the specimen and allocated into one of seven groups (n=10) based on strategies for cementation: Gr1-ScotchBond Multi Purpose plus (SBMP) + Relyx ARC resin cement; Gr2-Single Bond + Relyx ARC; Gr3-ED Primer + Panavia F resin cement; Gr4-SBMP + AllCem resin cement; Gr5-Relyx ARC; Gr6-Relyx Unicem resin cement; Gr7-Relyx Luting 2 glass ionomer cement. After cementation, the specimens were stored for seven days (in a humid environment at 37 degrees C) and submitted to pullout bond strength testing (the inferior part of each specimen was fixed and the fiber post was pulled out). The data (Kgf) were submitted to statistical analysis (one-way ANOVA and post-hoe Tukey tests, alpha=.05). The tested specimens were analyzed under the microscope and SEM for fracture analysis. Results: The strategy for post cementation affected the pullout retentive strength (Kgf) (p<0.0001) significantly. Gr6 (37.7 +/- 8(a) Gr1 (37.4 +/- 5.7(a)) and Gr4 (31.6 +/- 6.6(ab)) presented the highest pullout bond strengths. Gr2 (12.2 +/- 5.6(c)), Gr3 (6.5 +/- 5.2(c)) and Gr7 (5.1 +/- 2.8(c)) presented the lowest pullout bond strengths. Gr5 (24.2 +/- 7.4(b)) was similar to Gr4 and inferior to Gr6 and Gr1. Conclusion: The use of a three-step etch-&-rinse adhesive system appears to be effective. The application of other adhesive systems (single-bottle etch-&-rinse and self-etch adhesive systems) did not present high pullout strength values. The simplified self-adhesive resin cement (without adhesive application) presented good retentive performance. Further studies should be conducted.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 451
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]   Polymerization contraction stress in thin resin composite layers as a function of layer thickness [J].
Alster, D ;
Feilzer, AJ ;
de Gee, AJ ;
Davidson, CL .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 1997, 13 (03) :146-150
[2]   Effect of surface treatment on retention of glass-fiber endodontic posts [J].
Balbosh, A ;
Kern, M .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2006, 95 (03) :218-223
[3]  
Baldissara P, 2006, J ADHES DENT, V8, P97
[4]   Marginal adaptation in dentin of a self-adhesive universal resin cement compared with well-tried systems [J].
Behr, M ;
Rosentritt, M ;
Regnet, T ;
Lang, R ;
Handel, G .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2004, 20 (02) :191-197
[5]   Contraction stress and bond strength to dentin for compatible and incompatible combinations of bonding systems and chemical and light-cured core build-up resin composites [J].
Bolhuis, PB ;
de Gee, AJ ;
Kleverlaan, CJ ;
El Zohairy, AA ;
Feilzer, AJ .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2006, 22 (03) :223-233
[6]  
Bonfante Gerson, 2007, Braz. oral res., V21, P159
[7]   Microtensile bond strength between adhesive cements and root canal dentin [J].
Bouillaguet, S ;
Troesch, S ;
Wataha, JC ;
Krejci, I ;
Meyer, JM ;
Pashley, DH .
DENTAL MATERIALS, 2003, 19 (03) :199-205
[8]   Interfacial mechanics of push-out tests: theory and experiments [J].
Chandra, N ;
Ghonem, H .
COMPOSITES PART A-APPLIED SCIENCE AND MANUFACTURING, 2001, 32 (3-4) :575-584
[9]   Quantitative comparison of the water permeable zone among four types of dental adhesives used with a dual-cured composite [J].
Chang, J. ;
Platt, J. A. ;
Yi, K. ;
Cochran, M. A. .
OPERATIVE DENTISTRY, 2006, 31 (03) :346-353
[10]  
Cheong C, 2003, OPER DENT, V28, P747