Biological therapies in the spondyloarthritides - the current state

被引:72
作者
Braun, J
Sieper, J
机构
[1] Rheumazentrum Ruhrgebiet, D-44652 Herne, Germany
[2] Free Univ Berlin, Hosp Benjamin Franklin, Dept Gastroenterol & Rheumatol, D-1000 Berlin, Germany
关键词
ankylosing spondylitis; anti-TNF alpha therapy; conventional and innovative treatment; psoriatic arthritis;
D O I
10.1093/rheumatology/keh205
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Therapeutic options for patients suffering from the more severe spondyloarthritides (SpA) have been rather limited in the last decades. Evidence is now accumulating that anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) therapy is highly effective in SpA, especially in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Based on the data recently published concerning more than 1000 patients with AS and PsA, this treatment seems to be even more effective than in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The anti-TNFalpha agents currently available, infliximab (Remicade), etanercept (Enbrel) and adalimumab (Humira), are approved for the treatment of RA in the USA and Europe. The situation for SpA is different from RA because there is an unmet medical need, especially in AS, since no therapies with disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (DMARDs) are available for severely affected patients, especially those with spinal disease. Thus, TNF blockers may even be considered a first-line treatment in a patient with active AS and PsA whose condition is not sufficiently controlled with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in the case of axial disease, and sulphasalazine or methotrexate in the case of peripheral arthritis. For infliximab, a dose of 5 mg/kg is required, and intervals of between 6 and 12 weeks are necessary to constantly suppress disease activity-also a major aim for long-term treatment. The standard dosage of etanercept is 2 x 25 mg subcutaneously per week. There are almost no studies yet on adalimumab (standard dose in RA, 20-40 mg subcutaneously every 1-2 weeks) in SpA. Infliximab and etanercept are now both approved for AS in Europe. The efficacy of etanercept was first demonstrated in PsA, and it is now approved for this indication in the USA and Europe. There is preliminary evidence that both agents also work in other SpA, such as undifferentiated SpA (uSpA). Studies should be performed to document the long-term efficacy of this treatment. There is hope that ankylosis may be preventable, but it remains to be shown whether patients benefit from long-term anti-TNF therapy and whether radiological progression and ankylosis can be stopped. Severe adverse events have remained rare. Complicated infections including tuberculosis have been reported. These can largely be prevented by appropriate screening. As it stands now, the benefits of anti-TNF therapy in AS seem to outweigh these shortcomings.
引用
收藏
页码:1072 / 1084
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] 2011 Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis
    Machado, Pedro
    Bogas, Monica
    Ribeiro, Ana
    Costa, Jose
    Neto, Adriano
    Sepriano, Alexandre
    Raposo, Ana
    Cravo, Ana Rita
    Vilar, Antonio
    Furtado, Carolina
    Ambrosio, Catarina
    Miguel, Claudia
    Vaz, Claudia
    Catita, Cristina
    Nour, Dolores
    Araujo, Domingos
    Vieira-Sousa, Elsa
    Teixeira, Filipa
    Brandao, Filipe
    Canhao, Helena
    Cordeiro, Ines
    Goncalves, Ines
    Ferreira, Joana
    Fonseca, Joao Eurico
    Pereira da Silva, Jose Alberto
    Romeu, Jose
    Ferreira, Julia
    Costa, Lucia
    Mauricio, Luis
    Cunha-Miranda, Luis
    Parente, Manuela
    Coutinho, Margarida
    Cruz, Margarida
    Oliveira, Margarida
    Salvador, Maria Joao
    Santos, Maria Jose
    Pinto, Patricia
    Valente, Paula
    Abreu, Pedro
    Roque, Raquel
    Ramiro, Sofia
    Capela, Susana
    Las, Vera
    Barcelos, Anabela
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2012, 37 (01): : 26 - 39
  • [22] Recommendations of the Spanish Society of Rheumatology on treatment and use of systemic biological and non-biological therapies in psoriatic arthritis
    Torre Alonso, Juan Carlos
    del Campo Fontecha, Petra Diaz
    Almodovar, Raquel
    Canete, Juan D.
    Montilla Morales, Carlos
    Moreno, Mireia
    Plasencia-Rodriguez, Chamaida
    Ramirez Garcia, Julio
    Queiro, Ruben
    REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2018, 14 (05): : 254 - 268
  • [23] Should over-treatment of axial spondyloarthritis with biologics remain a concern after the issue of the new ASAS criteria? Data from REGISPONSERBIO (Spanish Register of Biological Therapy in Spondyloarthritides)
    Moreno, M.
    Gratacos, J.
    Navarro-Compan, V.
    de Miguel, E.
    Font, P.
    Clavaguera, T.
    Linares, L. F.
    Joven, B.
    Juanola, X.
    CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RHEUMATOLOGY, 2018, 36 (06) : 1038 - 1042
  • [24] Dealing with the high cost of biological therapies: developing and implementing a biological therapy prioritization protocol for ankylosing spondylitis patients in a tertiary hospital
    Borras-Blasco, Joaquin
    Castera, Elvira
    Cortes, Xavier
    Martin-Alonso, Juan
    Dolores Rosique-Robles, J.
    Javier Abad, F.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY AND THERAPEUTICS, 2015, 53 (12) : 997 - 1004
  • [25] Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis-2015 update
    Vieira-Sousa, Elsa
    Machado, Pedro M.
    Costa, Jose
    Ribeiro, Ana
    Aguiar, Renata
    Cerqueira, Marcos
    Neto, Adriano
    Bernardo, Alexandra
    Cordeiro, Ana
    Duarte, Catia
    Vinagre, Filipe
    Canhao, Helena
    Santos, Helena
    Neves, Joana Sousa
    Cunha-Miranda, Luis
    Silva, Margarida
    Santos, Maria Jose
    Bernardes, Miguel
    Bogas, Monica
    Abreu, Pedro
    Queiroz, Mario Viana
    Barros, Rita
    Falcao, Sandra
    Pimenta, Sofia
    Teixeira, Vitor
    Fonseca, Joao Eurico
    Barcelos, Anabela
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2015, 40 (03): : 275 - 290
  • [26] Portuguese recommendations for the use of biological therapies in patients with psoriatic arthritis-2015 update
    Vieira-Sousa, E.
    Machado, P. M.
    Costa, J.
    Ribeiro, A.
    Aguiar, R.
    Cerqueira, M.
    Neto, A.
    Bernardo, A.
    Cordeiro, A.
    Duarte, C.
    Vinagre, F.
    Canhao, H.
    Santos, H.
    Neves, J. S.
    Cunha-Miranda, L.
    Silva, M.
    Santos, M. J.
    Bernardes, M.
    Bogas, M.
    Abreu, P.
    Viana-Queiroz, M.
    Barros, R.
    Falcao, S.
    Pimenta, S.
    Teixeira, V
    Fonseca, J. E.
    Barcelos, A.
    ACTA REUMATOLOGICA PORTUGUESA, 2018, 43 (01): : 36 - 51
  • [27] Analysis of 4-year Dutch reimbursement application data of biological therapies for psoriatic arthritis
    Driessen, Rieke J. B.
    de Jong, Elke M. G. J.
    Salemink, Gerrit W.
    Buerer, Jan H. G.
    van de Kerkhof, Peter C. M.
    van den Hoogen, Frank H. J.
    RHEUMATOLOGY, 2010, 49 (03) : 588 - 591
  • [28] Epidemiological Characteristics and Adverse Events of Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Undergoing Treatment with Biological Therapies in Galicia
    Garcia Porrua, Carlos
    Maceiras Pan, Francisco Jose
    Mosquera Martinez, Jose Antonio
    Carmona, Loreto
    Correa Rey, Blanca
    Fernandez Dominguez, Luis
    Alvarez Rivas, Maria Noelia
    Pinto Tasende, Jose Antonio
    REUMATOLOGIA CLINICA, 2021, 17 (03): : 150 - 154
  • [29] Biological Therapies in Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Diseases: Can Biosimilars Reduce Access Inequities?
    Baumgart, Daniel C.
    Misery, Laurent
    Naeyaert, Sue
    Taylor, Peter C.
    FRONTIERS IN PHARMACOLOGY, 2019, 10
  • [30] Adherence to subcutaneous biological therapies in patients with inflammatory rheumatic diseases and inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review
    Nieto, Juan C.
    Arajol, Claudia
    Carmona, Loreto
    Marras, Carlos
    Cea-Calvo, Luis
    IMMUNOTHERAPY, 2021, 13 (05) : 433 - 458