Reduction in hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus with daily chlorhexidine gluconate bathing for medical inpatients

被引:24
|
作者
Lowe, Christopher F. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Lloyd-Smith, Elisa [1 ]
Sidhu, Baljinder [1 ]
Ritchie, Gordon [2 ,3 ]
Sharma, Azra [1 ]
Jang, Willson [2 ]
Wong, Anna [2 ]
Bilawka, Jennifer [2 ]
Richards, Danielle [1 ]
Kind, Thomas [1 ]
Puddicombe, David [1 ]
Champagne, Sylvie [2 ,3 ]
Leung, Victor [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Romney, Marc G. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Providence Hlth Care, Infect Prevent & Control, 5th F,1190 Hornby St, Providence, BC V6Z 2K5, Canada
[2] Providence Hlth Care, Div Med Microbiol, Providence, BC, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Pathol & Lab Med, Vancouver, BC, Canada
[4] Univ British Columbia, Div Infect Dis, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词
Nosocomial infection; Horizontal; CHG; Chlorhexidine gluconate; CARE-ASSOCIATED INFECTIONS; UNIVERSAL DECOLONIZATION; GENES QACA/B; TRIAL; COLONIZATION; COST; SUSCEPTIBILITY; TRANSMISSION; PREVALENCE; MUPIROCIN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajic.2016.09.019
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background: Daily bathing with chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) is increasingly used in intensive care units to prevent hospital-associated infections, but limited evidence exists for noncritical care settings. Methods: A prospective crossover study was conducted on 4 medical inpatient units in an urban, academic Canadian hospital from May 1, 2014-August 10, 2015. Intervention units used CHG over a 7-month period, including a 1-month wash-in phase, while control units used nonmedicated soap and water bathing. Rates of hospital-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and vancomycinresistant Enterococcus (VRE) colonization or infection were the primary end point. Hospital-associated S. aureus were investigated for CHG resistance with a qacA/B and smr polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and agar dilution. Results: Compliance with daily CHG bathing was 58%. Hospital-associated MRSA and VRE was decreased by 55% (5.1 vs 11.4 cases per 10,000 inpatient days, P =.04) and 36% (23.2 vs 36.0 cases per 10,000 inpatient days, P =.03), respectively, compared with control cohorts. There was no significant difference in rates of hospital-associated Clostridium difficile. Chlorhexidine resistance testing identified 1 isolate with an elevated minimum inhibitory concentration (8 mu g/mL), but it was PCR negative. Conclusions: This prospective pragmatic study to assess daily bathing for CHG on inpatient medical units was effective in reducing hospital-associatedMRSA and VRE. A critical component of CHG bathing onmedical units is sustained and appropriate application, which can be a challenge to accurately assess and needs to be considered before systematic implementation. (C) 2017 Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:255 / 259
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Effects of daily bathing with chlorhexidine and acquired infection of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus: a meta-analysis
    Chen, Wensen
    Li, Songqin
    Li, Lianhong
    Wu, Xin
    Zhang, Weihong
    JOURNAL OF THORACIC DISEASE, 2013, 5 (04) : 518 - 524
  • [2] Chlorhexidine Gluconate Bathing to Reduce Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Acquisition
    Petlin, Ann
    Schallom, Marilyn
    Prentice, Donna
    Sona, Carrie
    Mantia, Paula
    McMullen, Kathleen
    Landholt, Cassandra
    CRITICAL CARE NURSE, 2014, 34 (05) : 17 - 26
  • [3] Antibiotic and biocide resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococcus
    Suller, MTE
    Russell, AD
    JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 1999, 43 (04) : 281 - 291
  • [4] Ultrastructural Effects of Oritavancin on Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus
    Belley, Adam
    Harris, Robert
    Beveridge, Terry
    Parr, Tom, Jr.
    Moeck, Gregory
    ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS AND CHEMOTHERAPY, 2009, 53 (02) : 800 - 804
  • [5] Epidemiology of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in a rural state
    Polgreen, Philip M.
    Beekmann, Susan E.
    Chen, Yi Yi
    Doern, V.
    Pfaller, Michael A.
    Brueggemann, Angela B.
    Herwaldt, Loreen A.
    Diekema, Daniel J.
    INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2006, 27 (03): : 252 - 256
  • [6] Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) vs Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA)
    Ashwin, K. S.
    Muralidharan, N. P.
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2015, 33 : S166 - S167
  • [7] Evaluation of contact precautions for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus
    Bardossy, Ana Cecilia
    Alsafadi, Muhammad Yasser
    Starr, Patricia
    Chami, Eman
    Pietsch, Jennifer
    Moreno, Daniela
    Johnson, Laura
    Alangaden, George
    Zervos, Marcus
    Reyes, Katherine
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2017, 45 (12) : 1369 - 1371
  • [8] Control of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus in hospitalized children
    Fisher, MC
    PEDIATRIC INFECTIOUS DISEASE JOURNAL, 1998, 17 (09) : 825 - 826
  • [9] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci
    Jumaa, PA
    Hateley, PM
    Tabaqchali, S
    LANCET, 1997, 350 (9079): : 738 - 739
  • [10] Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant enterococci
    Nelson, RRS
    LANCET, 1997, 350 (9087): : 1327 - 1327