The Enneagram: A systematic review of the literature and directions for future research

被引:8
|
作者
Hook, Joshua N. [1 ]
Hall, Todd W. [2 ]
Davis, Don E. [3 ]
Van Tongeren, Daryl R. [4 ]
Conner, Mackenzie [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Texas, Dept Psychol, 1155 Union Cir 311280, Denton, TX 76203 USA
[2] Biola Univ, Dept Psychol, La Mirada, CA 90639 USA
[3] Georgia State Univ, Dept Counseling & Psychol Serv, Atlanta, GA 30303 USA
[4] Hope Coll, Dept Psychol, Holland, MI 49423 USA
关键词
assessment; enneagram; personality; spirituality; RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;
D O I
10.1002/jclp.23097
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The Enneagram is a typology that many clients use to understand their personality and interpersonal patterns, despite some concerns about its validity. Thus, the purpose of this review is to provide a comprehensive and clinician-friendly review of the extant empirical work on the Enneagram. After reviewing 104 independent samples, we found mixed evidence of reliability and validity. In terms of strengths, some factor analytic work has shown partial alignment with prior theorizing, and subscales show theory-consistent relationships with other constructs such as the Big 5. Also, several studies found the Enneagram was helpful for personal/spiritual growth. However, factor analytic work has typically found fewer than nine factors, and no work has used clustering techniques to derive the nine types. Also, there is little research supporting secondary aspects of Enneagram theory, such as wings and intertype movement. We conclude by highlighting directions for future research and implications for clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 883
页数:19
相关论文
共 50 条