Low-Cost, Three-Dimensionally-Printed, Anatomical Models for Optimization of Orbital Wall Reconstruction

被引:27
作者
Dvoracek, Lucas A.
Lee, Jonathan Y.
Unadkat, Jignesh V.
Lee, Yan H.
Thakrar, Darshit
Losee, Joseph E.
Goldstein, Jesse A.
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Plast Surg, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Radiol, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[3] Univ Massachusetts, Med Sch Baystate, Baystate Med Ctr, Div Plast & Reconstruct Surg, Amherst, MA 01003 USA
[4] Yale Sch Med, Div Otolaryngol, New Haven, CT USA
关键词
HEAD;
D O I
10.1097/PRS.0000000000007495
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Orbital blowout fracture reconstruction often requires an implant, which must be shaped at the time of surgical intervention. This process is time-consuming and requires multiple placement trials, possibly risking complications. Three-dimensional printing technology has enabled health care facilities to generate custom anatomical models to which implants can be molded to precisely match orbital anatomy. The authors present their early experience with these models and their use in optimizing orbital fracture fixation. Methods: Maxillofacial computed tomographic scans from patients with orbital floor or wall fractures were prospectively obtained and digitally reconstructed. Both injured-side and mirrored unaffected-side models were produced in-house by stereolithography printing technique. Models were used as templates for molding titanium reconstruction plates, and plates were implanted to reconstruct the patients' orbital walls. Results: Nine patients (mean age, 15.5 years) were included. Enophthalmos was present in seven patients preoperatively and resolved in six patients with surgery. All patients had excellent conformation of the implant to the fracture site on postoperative computed tomographic scan. Postoperative fracture-side orbital volumes were significantly less than preoperative, and not significantly different from unfractured-side orbital volumes. Total model preparation time was approximately 10 hours. Materials cost was at most $21. Plate bending time was approximately 60 seconds. Conclusions: Patient-specific orbital models can speed the shaping of orbital reconstruction implants and potentially improve surgical correction of orbital fractures. Production of these models with consumer-grade technology confers the same advantages as commercial production at a fraction of the cost and time.
引用
收藏
页码:162 / 166
页数:5
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]   3D-Printed Models of Cleft Lip and Palate for Surgical Training and Patient Education [J].
Chou, Pang-Yun ;
Hallac, Rami R. ;
Shih, Ellen ;
Trieu, Jenny ;
Penumatcha, Anjani ;
Das, Priyanka ;
Meyer, Clark A. ;
Seaward, James R. ;
Kane, Alex A. .
CLEFT PALATE-CRANIOFACIAL JOURNAL, 2018, 55 (03) :323-327
[2]   Evidence-Based Medicine: Orbital Floor Fractures [J].
Gart, Michael S. ;
Gosain, Arun K. .
PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY, 2014, 134 (06) :1345-1355
[3]   Retrospective analysis of orbital floor fractures-complications, outcome, and review of literature [J].
Gosau, Martin ;
Schoeneich, Moritz ;
Draenert, Florian G. ;
Ettl, Tobias ;
Driemel, Oliver ;
Reichert, Torsten E. .
CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2011, 15 (03) :305-313
[4]   Patient-specific puzzle implant preformed with 3D-printed rapid prototype model for combined orbital floor and medial wall fracture [J].
Kim, Young Chul ;
Min, Kyung Hyun ;
Choi, Jong Woo ;
Koh, Kyung S. ;
Oh, Tae Suk ;
Jeong, Woo Shik .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2018, 71 (04) :496-503
[5]   How Symmetrical Are Bony Orbits in Humans? [J].
Lieger, Olivier ;
Schaub, Manuel ;
Taghizadeh, Elham ;
Buechler, Philippe .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2019, 77 (01) :118-125
[6]   Customized Orbital Wall Reconstruction Using Three-Dimensionally Printed Rapid Prototype Model in Patients With Orbital Wall Fracture [J].
Oh, Tae Suk ;
Jeong, Woo Shik ;
Chang, Taik Jin ;
Koh, Kyung S. ;
Choi, Jong-Woo .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2016, 27 (08) :2020-2024
[7]   Orbital fracture repair outcomes with preformed titanium mesh implants and comparison to porous polyethylene coated titanium sheets [J].
Peng, Michelle Y. ;
Merbs, Shannath L. ;
Grant, Michael P. ;
Mahoney, Nicholas R. .
JOURNAL OF CRANIO-MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2017, 45 (02) :271-274
[8]   Advances in oncologic head and neck reconstruction: Systematic review and future considerations of virtual surgical planning and computer aided design/computer aided modeling [J].
Rodby, Katherine A. ;
Turin, Sergey ;
Jacobs, Ryan J. ;
Cruz, Janet F. ;
Hassid, Victor J. ;
Kolokythas, Antonio ;
Antony, Anuja K. .
JOURNAL OF PLASTIC RECONSTRUCTIVE AND AESTHETIC SURGERY, 2014, 67 (09) :1171-1185
[9]  
Schuknecht B, 1996, NEURORADIOLOGY, V38, P470
[10]   Accuracy and Predictability in Use of AO Three-Dimensionally Preformed Titanium Mesh Plates for Posttraumatic Orbital Reconstruction: A Pilot Study [J].
Scolozzi, Paolo ;
Momjian, Armen ;
Heuberger, Joris ;
Andersen, Elene ;
Broome, Martin ;
Terzic, Andrej ;
Jaques, Bertrand .
JOURNAL OF CRANIOFACIAL SURGERY, 2009, 20 (04) :1108-1113