Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate

被引:4444
作者
Levey, Andrew S.
Coresh, Josef
Greene, Tom
Stevens, Lesley A.
Lucy Zhang, Yaping
Hendriksen, Stephen
Kusek, John W.
Van Lente, Frederick
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] NIDDK, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease but require calibration of the serum creatinine assay to the laboratory that developed the equation. The 4-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study has been reexpressed for use with a standardized assay. Objective: To describe the performance of the revised 4-variable MDRD Study equation and compare it with the performance of the 6-variable MDRD Study and Cockcroft-Gault equations. Design: Comparison of estimated and measured GFR. Setting: 15 clinical centers participating in a randomized, controlled trial. Patients: 1628 patients with chronic kidney disease participating in the MDRD Study. Measurements: Serum creatinine levels were calibrated to an assay traceable to isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Glomerular filtraton rate was measured as urinary clearance of I-125-iothalamate. Results: Mean measured GFR was 39.8 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (SD, 21.2). Accuracy and precision of the revised 4-variable equation were similar to those of the original 6-variable equation and better than in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for bias, with 90%, 91%, 60%, and 83% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, respectively. Differences between measured and estimated GFR were greater for all equations when the estimated GFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) or greater. Limitations: The MDRD Study included few patients with a GFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Equations were not compared in a separate study sample. Conclusions: The 4-variable MDRD Study equation provides reasonably accurate GFR estimates in patients with chronic kidney disease and a measured GFR of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). By using the reexpressed MDRD Study equation with the standardized serum creatinine assay, clinical laboratories can report more accurate GFR estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
  • [1] Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement
    Anavekar, N
    Bais, R
    Carney, S
    Eris, J
    Gallagher, M
    Johnson, D
    Jones, G
    Sikaris, K
    Lonergan, M
    Ludlow, M
    Mackie, J
    Mathew, T
    May, S
    McBride, G
    Meerkin, M
    Peake, M
    Power, D
    Snelling, P
    Voss, D
    Walker, R
    [J]. MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2005, 183 (03) : 138 - +
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1969, Physiology of the Human Kidney
  • [3] Predictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels
    Bostom, AG
    Kronenberg, F
    Ritz, E
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (08): : 2140 - 2144
  • [4] *CAISS NAT ASS MAL, AV CONV NAT DIR LAB
  • [5] Relationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney function
    Cirillo, M
    Anastasio, P
    De Santo, NG
    [J]. NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (09) : 1791 - 1798
  • [6] PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE
    COCKCROFT, DW
    GAULT, MH
    [J]. NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) : 31 - 41
  • [7] Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate
    Coresh, J
    Astor, BC
    McQuillan, G
    Kusek, J
    Greene, T
    Van Lente, F
    Levey, AS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (05) : 920 - 929
  • [8] Chronic kidney disease awareness, prevalence, and trends among US adults, 1999 to 2000
    Coresh, J
    Byrd-Holt, D
    Astor, BC
    Briggs, JP
    Eggers, PW
    Lacher, DA
    Hostetter, TH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (01): : 180 - 188
  • [9] Kidney function estimating equations: where do we stand?
    Coresh, Josef
    Stevens, L. A.
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2006, 15 (03) : 276 - 284
  • [10] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845