Using standardized serum creatinine values in the modification of diet in renal disease study equation for estimating glomerular filtration rate

被引:4491
作者
Levey, Andrew S.
Coresh, Josef
Greene, Tom
Stevens, Lesley A.
Lucy Zhang, Yaping
Hendriksen, Stephen
Kusek, John W.
Van Lente, Frederick
机构
[1] Tufts Univ, New England Med Ctr, Div Nephrol, Boston, MA 02111 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Med Inst, Baltimore, MD 21205 USA
[3] Cleveland Clin Fdn, Cleveland, OH 44195 USA
[4] NIDDK, Bethesda, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-145-4-200608150-00004
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) estimates facilitate detection of chronic kidney disease but require calibration of the serum creatinine assay to the laboratory that developed the equation. The 4-variable equation from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study has been reexpressed for use with a standardized assay. Objective: To describe the performance of the revised 4-variable MDRD Study equation and compare it with the performance of the 6-variable MDRD Study and Cockcroft-Gault equations. Design: Comparison of estimated and measured GFR. Setting: 15 clinical centers participating in a randomized, controlled trial. Patients: 1628 patients with chronic kidney disease participating in the MDRD Study. Measurements: Serum creatinine levels were calibrated to an assay traceable to isotope-dilution mass spectrometry. Glomerular filtraton rate was measured as urinary clearance of I-125-iothalamate. Results: Mean measured GFR was 39.8 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) (SD, 21.2). Accuracy and precision of the revised 4-variable equation were similar to those of the original 6-variable equation and better than in the Cockcroft-Gault equation, even when the latter was corrected for bias, with 90%, 91%, 60%, and 83% of estimates within 30% of measured GFR, respectively. Differences between measured and estimated GFR were greater for all equations when the estimated GFR was 60 mL/min per 1.73 m(2) or greater. Limitations: The MDRD Study included few patients with a GFR greater than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). Equations were not compared in a separate study sample. Conclusions: The 4-variable MDRD Study equation provides reasonably accurate GFR estimates in patients with chronic kidney disease and a measured GFR of less than 90 mL/min per 1.73 m(2). By using the reexpressed MDRD Study equation with the standardized serum creatinine assay, clinical laboratories can report more accurate GFR estimates.
引用
收藏
页码:247 / 254
页数:8
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: a position statement [J].
Anavekar, N ;
Bais, R ;
Carney, S ;
Eris, J ;
Gallagher, M ;
Johnson, D ;
Jones, G ;
Sikaris, K ;
Lonergan, M ;
Ludlow, M ;
Mackie, J ;
Mathew, T ;
May, S ;
McBride, G ;
Meerkin, M ;
Peake, M ;
Power, D ;
Snelling, P ;
Voss, D ;
Walker, R .
MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA, 2005, 183 (03) :138-+
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1969, Physiology of the Human Kidney
[3]   Predictive performance of renal function equations for patients with chronic kidney disease and normal serum creatinine levels [J].
Bostom, AG ;
Kronenberg, F ;
Ritz, E .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2002, 13 (08) :2140-2144
[4]  
*CAISS NAT ASS MAL, AV CONV NAT DIR LAB
[5]   Relationship of gender, age, and body mass index to errors in predicted kidney function [J].
Cirillo, M ;
Anastasio, P ;
De Santo, NG .
NEPHROLOGY DIALYSIS TRANSPLANTATION, 2005, 20 (09) :1791-1798
[6]   PREDICTION OF CREATININE CLEARANCE FROM SERUM CREATININE [J].
COCKCROFT, DW ;
GAULT, MH .
NEPHRON, 1976, 16 (01) :31-41
[7]   Calibration and random variation of the serum creatinine assay as critical elements of using equations to estimate glomerular filtration rate [J].
Coresh, J ;
Astor, BC ;
McQuillan, G ;
Kusek, J ;
Greene, T ;
Van Lente, F ;
Levey, AS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF KIDNEY DISEASES, 2002, 39 (05) :920-929
[8]   Chronic kidney disease awareness, prevalence, and trends among US adults, 1999 to 2000 [J].
Coresh, J ;
Byrd-Holt, D ;
Astor, BC ;
Briggs, JP ;
Eggers, PW ;
Lacher, DA ;
Hostetter, TH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF NEPHROLOGY, 2005, 16 (01) :180-188
[9]   Kidney function estimating equations: where do we stand? [J].
Coresh, Josef ;
Stevens, L. A. .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEPHROLOGY AND HYPERTENSION, 2006, 15 (03) :276-284
[10]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845