Image Quality Assessment Using Directional Anisotropy Structure Measurement

被引:36
作者
Ding, Li [1 ]
Huang, Hua [2 ]
Zang, Yu [3 ]
机构
[1] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Elect & Informat Engn, Xian 710049, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Comp Sci, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Xiamen Univ, Fujian Key Lab Sensing & Comp Smart Cities, Xiamen Fj 361005, Peoples R China
关键词
Image quality assessment (IQA); full-reference (FR); structure measurement; structure similarity; VISUAL-ATTENTION; SIMILARITY; MODEL; DEGRADATION; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1109/TIP.2017.2665972
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Image quality assessment models prefer an effective visual feature to perceive image quality. Structure-based image quality metrics have verified that a measure of structural information change can provide a good approximation to perceived image distortion. Furthermore, psychological studies have suggested that human beings awareness on image structures is perception-driven and the human visual system (HVS) is more sensitive to the distortion on dominant structures rather than on minor textures. Accordingly, the image distortion can be perceived well by measuring the information loss of the dominant structures. Considering two conclusive psychovisual observations-anisotropy and local directionality-this paper takes a more comprehensive analysis on the behavior of structures and textures, and introduces a directional anisotropic structure measurement (DASM) to represent the dominant structures that are visually important. The proposed DASM can well identify dominant structures, to which the HVS is highly sensitive, from minor textures. Using the DASM as a visual feature, we assess image quality by measuring its degradations. The proposed method was tested on the six benchmark databases and the experimental results demonstrate that our method obtains good performance and correlates well with the human perception.
引用
收藏
页码:1799 / 1809
页数:11
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], Categorical image quality (CSIQ) database
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2011, MICT Image Quality Evaluation Database
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, Live image quality assessment database release 2, DOI DOI 10.1109/CVPR.2015.7298594
  • [4] [Anonymous], SUBJECTIVE QUALITY A
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2009, P 2 INT C IMM TEL MA
  • [6] Chandler D.M., 2007, A57 DATABASE
  • [7] Gradient-based structural similarity for image quality assessment
    Chen, Guan-Hao
    Yang, Chun-Ling
    Xie, Sheng-Li
    [J]. 2006 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON IMAGE PROCESSING, ICIP 2006, PROCEEDINGS, 2006, : 2929 - +
  • [8] Image quality assessment based on a degradation model
    Damera-Venkata, N
    Kite, TD
    Geisler, WS
    Evans, BL
    Bovik, AC
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING, 2000, 9 (04) : 636 - 650
  • [9] Perceptual quality metrics applied to still image compression
    Eckert, MP
    Bradley, AP
    [J]. SIGNAL PROCESSING, 1998, 70 (03) : 177 - 200
  • [10] Forstner W., 1987, P ISPRS INT C FAST P, P281