Optimizing wheat production and reducing environmental impacts through scientist-farmer engagement: Lessons from the North China Plain

被引:17
作者
Jiang, Wei [1 ]
Zhu, Annah [2 ]
Wang, Chong [1 ]
Zhang, Fusuo [1 ]
Jiao, Xiaoqiang [1 ]
机构
[1] China Agr Univ, Natl Acad Agr Green Dev, Coll Resources & Environm Sci, Dept Plant Nutr, 2 Yuan Ming Yuan West Rd, Beijing 100193, Peoples R China
[2] Wageningen Univ, Environm Policy Grp, Wageningen, Netherlands
来源
FOOD AND ENERGY SECURITY | 2021年 / 10卷 / 01期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
multi-objective; smallholder farmers; sustainable intensification; wheat production; NITROGEN-USE EFFICIENCY; FOOD SECURITY; SUSTAINABLE INTENSIFICATION; MANAGEMENT-PRACTICES; SMALLHOLDER FARMERS; CROP PRODUCTIVITY; MANAGING NITROGEN; NUTRIENT USE; AGRICULTURE; YIELD;
D O I
10.1002/fes3.255
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Producing high economic benefits and high grain yields with limited environmental impacts is crucial for feeding the world's growing population. Yet it remains challenging to improve the performance of one objective without creating unintended consequences for other objectives. This is especially difficult for smallholders navigating a diverse array of environmental and personal demands. This study demonstrates how combining participatory research through the Science and Technology Backyards (STB) approach with Pareto-based ranking modeling can increase smallholder production while also reducing environmental impact. Through an intensive farmer survey in a 1 x 1 km grid in Quzhou County, we demonstrate that farmers engaged in STBs performed better according to multiple objectives (i.e., optimizing overall grain yield, benefit-cost ratio, and GHG emissions, without compromising any one of these objectives) than farmer's not engaged in STBs. Moreover, we used a Pareto optimization approach (OPT) to determine the optimal smallholder scenario. We found that under OPT, grain yield could reach 9.5 t/ha, with a benefit-cost ratio of 2.1, a 100% N recovery efficiency, and 7,395 kg CO(2)eq ha(-1) GHG emissions. With OPT as a final goal, our research team worked with STB farmers to improve economic and environmental outcomes without compromising yield. Our findings demonstrate that no significant difference was obtained between farmers engaged in STBs and these under OPT. Compared with non-STB farmers, STB farmers' grain yield improved by 18%, benefit-cost ratio improved by 26% due to improved N recovery efficiency, and GHG emissions were reduced by 31%. These improvements demonstrate the power of scientist-farmer engagement for optimizing wheat production. Such engagement allows farmers to modify their agronomic practices to more closely match Pareto optimal conditions, thus improving environmental and economic benefits without compromising yield. Our results provide solid evidence of the potential for sustainable wheat production by combining modeling with participatory research.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Differences between wheat and barley in leaf and tillering coordination under contrasting nitrogen and sulfur conditions
    Alzueta, Ignacio
    Gabriela Abeledo, L.
    Mignone, Cesar M.
    Miralles, Daniel J.
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2012, 41 : 92 - 102
  • [2] Bellon M.R., 2001, PARTICIPATORY RES ME
  • [3] Factors Affecting Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Grain Yield of Summer Maize on Smallholder Farms in the North China Plain
    Chen, Guangfeng
    Cao, Hongzhu
    Liang, Jun
    Ma, Wenqi
    Guo, Lufang
    Zhang, Shuhua
    Jiang, Rongfeng
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Goulding, Keith W. T.
    Zhang, Fusuo
    [J]. SUSTAINABILITY, 2018, 10 (02)
  • [4] Producing more grain with lower environmental costs
    Chen, Xinping
    Cui, Zhenling
    Fan, Mingsheng
    Vitousek, Peter
    Zhao, Ming
    Ma, Wenqi
    Wang, Zhenlin
    Zhang, Weijian
    Yan, Xiaoyuan
    Yang, Jianchang
    Deng, Xiping
    Gao, Qiang
    Zhang, Qiang
    Guo, Shiwei
    Ren, Jun
    Li, Shiqing
    Ye, Youliang
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Huang, Jianliang
    Tang, Qiyuan
    Sun, Yixiang
    Peng, Xianlong
    Zhang, Jiwang
    He, Mingrong
    Zhu, Yunji
    Xue, Jiquan
    Wang, Guiliang
    Wu, Liang
    An, Ning
    Wu, Liangquan
    Ma, Lin
    Zhang, Weifeng
    Zhang, Fusuo
    [J]. NATURE, 2014, 514 (7523) : 486 - +
  • [5] Why do smallholder farmers dis-adopt conservation agriculture? Insights from Malawi
    Chinse, Edna
    Dougill, Ndrew
    Stringer, Lindsay
    [J]. LAND DEGRADATION & DEVELOPMENT, 2019, 30 (05) : 533 - 543
  • [6] On-farm evaluation of an in-season nitrogen management strategy based on soil Nmin test
    Cui, Zhenling
    Zhang, Fusuo
    Chen, Xinping
    Miao, Yuxin
    Li, Junliang
    Shi, Liwei
    Xu, Jiufei
    Ye, Youliang
    Liu, Chunsheng
    Yang, Zhiping
    Zhang, Qiang
    Huang, Shaomin
    Bao, Dejun
    [J]. FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 2008, 105 (1-2) : 48 - 55
  • [7] Pursuing sustainable productivity with millions of smallholder farmers
    Cui, Zhenling
    Zhang, Hongyan
    Chen, Xinping
    Zhang, Chaochun
    Ma, Wenqi
    Huang, Chengdong
    Zhang, Weifeng
    Mi, Guohua
    Miao, Yuxin
    Li, Xiaolin
    Gao, Qiang
    Yang, Jianchang
    Wang, Zhaohui
    Ye, Youliang
    Guo, Shiwei
    Lu, Jianwei
    Huang, Jianliang
    Lv, Shihua
    Sun, Yixiang
    Liu, Yuanying
    Peng, Xianlong
    Ren, Jun
    Li, Shiqing
    Deng, Xiping
    Shi, Xiaojun
    Zhang, Qiang
    Yang, Zhiping
    Tang, Li
    Wei, Changzhou
    Jia, Liangliang
    Zhang, Jiwang
    He, Mingrong
    Tong, Yanan
    Tang, Qiyuan
    Zhong, Xuhua
    Liu, Zhaohui
    Cao, Ning
    Kou, Changlin
    Ying, Hao
    Yin, Yulong
    Jiao, Xiaoqiang
    Zhang, Qingsong
    Fan, Mingsheng
    Jiang, Rongfeng
    Zhang, Fusuo
    Dou, Zhengxia
    [J]. NATURE, 2018, 555 (7696) : 363 - +
  • [8] Improving crop productivity and resource use efficiency to ensure food security and environmental quality in China
    Fan, Mingsheng
    Shen, Jianbo
    Yuan, Lixing
    Jiang, Rongfeng
    Chen, Xinping
    Davies, William J.
    Zhang, Fusuo
    [J]. JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2012, 63 (01) : 13 - 24
  • [9] THE ADOPTION OF AGRICULTURAL INNOVATIONS - A REVIEW
    FEDER, G
    UMALI, DL
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 1993, 43 (3-4) : 215 - 239
  • [10] Solutions for a cultivated planet
    Foley, Jonathan A.
    Ramankutty, Navin
    Brauman, Kate A.
    Cassidy, Emily S.
    Gerber, James S.
    Johnston, Matt
    Mueller, Nathaniel D.
    O'Connell, Christine
    Ray, Deepak K.
    West, Paul C.
    Balzer, Christian
    Bennett, Elena M.
    Carpenter, Stephen R.
    Hill, Jason
    Monfreda, Chad
    Polasky, Stephen
    Rockstrom, Johan
    Sheehan, John
    Siebert, Stefan
    Tilman, David
    Zaks, David P. M.
    [J]. NATURE, 2011, 478 (7369) : 337 - 342