Test the reliability of doubly robust estimation with missing response data

被引:3
作者
Chen, Baojiang [1 ]
Qin, Jing [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nebraska, Med Ctr, Coll Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat, Omaha, NE 68198 USA
[2] NIAID, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
Auxiliary; Doubly robust; Estimating equation; Goodness of fit; Missing data; SURROGATE END-POINTS; CLINICAL-TRIALS; REGRESSION; CHECKING; MODEL;
D O I
10.1111/biom.12150
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
In statistical inference, one has to make sure that the underlying regression model is correctly specified otherwise the resulting estimation may be biased. Model checking is an important method to detect any departure of the regression model from the true one. Missing data are a ubiquitous problem in social and medical studies. If the underlying regression model is correctly specified, recent researches show great popularity of the doubly robust (DR) estimates method for handling missing data because of its robustness to the misspecification of either the missing data model or the conditional mean model, that is, the model for the conditional expectation of true regression model conditioning on the observed quantities. However, little work has been devoted to the goodness of fit test for DR estimates method. In this article, we propose a testing method to assess the reliability of the estimator derived from the DR estimating equation with possibly missing response and always observed auxiliary variables. Numerical studies demonstrate that the proposed test can control type I errors well. Furthermore the proposed method can detect departures from model assumptions in the marginal mean model of interest powerfully. A real dementia data set is used to illustrate the method for the diagnosis of model misspecification in the problem of missing response with an always observed auxiliary variable for cross-sectional data.
引用
收藏
页码:289 / 298
页数:10
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Resolving paradoxes involving surrogate end points [J].
Baker, SG ;
Izmirlian, G ;
Kipnis, V .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2005, 168 :753-762
[2]   Surrogate endpoints: Wishful thinking or reality? [J].
Baker, Stuart G. .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2006, 98 (08) :502-503
[3]   Doubly robust estimation in missing data and causal inference models [J].
Bang, H .
BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (04) :962-972
[4]   On the use of surrogate end points in randomized trials [J].
Begg, CB ;
Leung, DHY .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2000, 163 :15-24
[5]  
Burzykowski T., 2005, EVALUATION SURROGATE
[6]   Improving efficiency and robustness of the doubly robust estimator for a population mean with incomplete data [J].
Cao, Weihua ;
Tsiatis, Anastasios A. ;
Davidian, Marie .
BIOMETRIKA, 2009, 96 (03) :723-734
[7]   A comparison of multiple imputation and doubly robust estimation for analyses with missing data [J].
Carpenter, James R. ;
Kenward, Michael G. ;
Vansteelandt, Stijn .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES A-STATISTICS IN SOCIETY, 2006, 169 :571-584
[8]   Doubly Robust Estimates for Binary Longitudinal Data Analysis with Missing Response and Missing Covariates [J].
Chen, Baojiang ;
Zhou, Xiao-Hua .
BIOMETRICS, 2011, 67 (03) :830-842
[9]   Analysis of longitudinal binary data from multiphase sampling [J].
Clayton, D ;
Spiegelhalter, D ;
Dunn, G ;
Pickles, A .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1998, 60 :71-87
[10]   Semiparametric estimation of treatment effect in a pretest-posttest study with missing data [J].
Davidian, M ;
Tsiatis, AA ;
Leon, S .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2005, 20 (03) :261-282