Perception of primary health professionals about Female Genital Mutilation: from healthcare to intercultural competence

被引:51
作者
Kaplan-Marcusan, Adriana [2 ]
Toran-Monserrat, Pere [1 ]
Moreno-Navarro, Juana
Fabregas, Ma Jose Castany [3 ]
Munoz-Ortiz, Laura [4 ]
机构
[1] Catalan Hlth Inst, Primary Healthcare Ctr Gatassa Mataro 6, Mataro 08303, Spain
[2] Autonomous Univ Barcelona, Dept Social & Cultural Anthropol, E-08193 Barcelona, Spain
[3] Catalan Hlth Inst, Primary Healthcare Ctr St Andreu Llavaneres, Barcelona, Spain
[4] IDIAP Jodi Gol, Primary Healthcare Res Support Unit Barcelones No, Mataro 08303, Spain
关键词
WOMEN; CONSEQUENCES; DYNAMICS; GAMBIA;
D O I
10.1186/1472-6963-9-11
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The practice of Female Genital Mutilation (FGM), a deeply-rooted tradition in 28 countries in Sub-Saharan Africa, carries important negative consequences for the health and quality of life of women and children. Migratory movements have brought this harmful traditional practice to our medical offices, with the subsequent conflicts related to how to approach this healthcare problem, involving not only a purely healthcare-related event but also questions of an ethical, cultural identity and human rights nature. Methods: The aim of this study was to analyse the perceptions, degree of knowledge, attitudes and practices of the primary healthcare professionals in relation to FGM. A transversal, descriptive study was performed with a self-administered questionnaire to family physicians, paediatricians, nurses, midwives and gynaecologists. Trends towards changes in the two periods studied (2001 and 2004) were analysed. Results: A total of 225 (80%) professionals answered the questionnaire in 2001 and 184 (62%) in 2004. Sixteen percent declared detection of some case in 2004, rising three-fold from the number reported in 2001. Eighteen percent stated that they had no interest in FGM. Less than 40% correctly identified the typology, while less than 30% knew the countries in which the practice is carried out and 82% normally attended patients from these countries. Conclusion: Female genital mutilations are present in primary healthcare medical offices with paediatricians and gynaecologists having the closest contact with the problem. Preventive measures should be designed as should sensitization to promote stands against these practices.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   High fertility Gambians in low fertility Spain: The dynamics of child accumulation across transnational space [J].
Bledsoe, Caroline ;
Houle, Rene ;
Sow, Papa .
DEMOGRAPHIC RESEARCH, 2007, 16 :375-412
[2]   Women's health - Life span: conception to adolescence [J].
Craft, N .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 315 (7117) :1227-1230
[3]   Female genital mutilation: A descriptive study [J].
Dandash, KF ;
Refaat, AH ;
Eyada, M .
JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2001, 27 (05) :453-458
[4]   Female genital mutilation and its psychosexual impact [J].
El-Defrawi, MH ;
Lotfy, G ;
Dandash, KF ;
Refaat, AH ;
Eyada, M .
JOURNAL OF SEX & MARITAL THERAPY, 2001, 27 (05) :465-473
[5]  
Frader JE, 1998, PEDIATRICS, V102, P153
[6]  
Geiger HJ, 2001, CAN MED ASSOC J, V164, P1699
[7]  
*GEN CAT, 2002, PROT ACT PREV MUT GE
[8]   Socio-cultural dynamics of female genital cutting: Research findings, gaps, and directions [J].
Gruenbaum, E .
CULTURE HEALTH & SEXUALITY, 2005, 7 (05) :429-441
[9]  
*INT AG, 2008, EL FEM GEN MUT INT S
[10]  
Juckett G, 2005, AM FAM PHYSICIAN, V72, P2267