TOP INCOMES AND NATIONAL SAVINGS

被引:22
作者
Leigh, Andrew [1 ]
Posso, Alberto [1 ]
机构
[1] Australian Natl Univ, Econ Program, Res Sch Social Sci, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
关键词
ECONOMIC-GROWTH; INEQUALITY; PERSPECTIVE; EVOLUTION; AMERICA; RATES;
D O I
10.1111/j.1475-4991.2008.00303.x
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
The relationship between income inequality and national savings is theoretically ambiguous, and past empirical studies have delivered mixed results. We revisit the question using a newly available source of data on inequality: the income share of the richest 10 percent and the richest 1 percent. Combining this with historical data on national savings rates, we are able to investigate the relationship for 11 developed countries over the period 1921-2002. We find no consistent relationship between lagged top income shares and current savings rates, and our standard errors are small enough that we are able to reject more than modest effects in either direction. We view this as suggesting that inequality at the top end of the distribution is not a major driver of national savings rates.
引用
收藏
页码:57 / 74
页数:18
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Inequality and economic growth:: The perspective of the new growth theories [J].
Aghion, P ;
Caroli, E ;
García-Peñalosa, C .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 1999, 37 (04) :1615-1660
[2]   DISTRIBUTIVE POLITICS AND ECONOMIC-GROWTH [J].
ALESINA, A ;
RODRIK, D .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF ECONOMICS, 1994, 109 (02) :465-490
[3]   Income distribution, political instability, and investment [J].
Alesina, A ;
Perotti, R .
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1996, 40 (06) :1203-1228
[4]  
[Anonymous], INT FIN STAT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, UNDERSTANDING CONSUM, DOI DOI 10.1093/0198288247.003.0007
[6]  
[Anonymous], 5836 CEPR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1997, 97181 IMF
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2007, TOP INCOMES 20 CENTU
[9]  
Atikinson A.B., 2007, TOP INCOMES 20 CENTU, P82
[10]   Promise and pitfalls in the use of "secondary" data-sets: Income inequality in OECD countries as a case study [J].
Atkinson, AB ;
Brandolini, A .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC LITERATURE, 2001, 39 (03) :771-799