PRETREATMENT ENDORECTAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING AND MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPIC IMAGING FEATURES OF PROSTATE CANCER AS PREDICTORS OF RESPONSE TO EXTERNAL BEAM RADIOTHERAPY

被引:41
|
作者
Joseph, Tim [1 ]
McKenna, David A. [1 ]
Westphalen, Antonio C. [1 ]
Coakley, Fergus V. [1 ]
Zhao, Shoujun [1 ]
Lu, Ying [1 ]
Hsu, I-Chow [2 ]
Roach, Mack, III [2 ]
Kurhanewicz, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Dept Radiat Oncol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2009年 / 73卷 / 03期
关键词
Cancer-prostate; Spectroscopy-prostate; Radiotherapy; Magnetic resonance imaging; Outcome analysis; DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION; RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; PATHOLOGICAL STAGE; ANTIGEN FAILURE; SEMINAL-VESICLE; TUMOR VOLUME; MR; CARCINOMA; PULSES; MEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.056
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To evaluate whether pretreatment combined endorectal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) findings are predictive of outcome in patients who undergo external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Methods and Materials: We retrospectively identified 67 men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who underwent combined endorectal MRI and MRSI at our institution between January 1998 and October 2003 before whole-pelvis external beam radiotherapy. A single reader recorded tumor presence, stage, and metabolic abnormality at combined MRI and MRSI. Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox univariate and multivariate analyses explored the relationship between clinical and imaging variables and outcome, using biochemical or metastatic failure as endpoints. Results: After a mean follow-up of 44 months (range, 3-96), 6 patients developed both metastatic and biochemical failure, with an additional 13 patients developing biochemical failure alone. Multivariate Cox analysis demonstrated that the only independent predictor of biochemical failure was the volume of malignant metabolism on MRSI (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 1.29-2.06; p < 0.0001). The two independent predictors of metastatic failure were MRI tumor size (HR 1.349 95 % CI 1.03-1.73; p = 0.028) and the finding of seminal vesicle invasion on MRI (HR 28.059 95% CI 3.96-198.67; p = 0.0008). Conclusions: In multivariate analysis, MRI and MRSI findings before EBRT in patients with prostate cancer are more accurate independent predictors of outcome than clinical variables, and in particular, the findings of seminal vesicle invasion and extensive tumor predict a worse prognosis. (c) 2009 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:665 / 671
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Prostate cancer - the role of magnetic resonance imaging
    Mocikova, Ingrid
    Babela, Jozef
    Balaz, Vladimir
    BIOMEDICAL PAPERS-OLOMOUC, 2012, 156 (02): : 103 - 107
  • [42] Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer
    Seitz, Michael
    Shukla-Dave, Amita
    Bjartell, Anders
    Touijer, Karim
    Sciarra, Alessandro
    Bastian, Patrick J.
    Stief, Christian
    Hricak, Hedvig
    Graser, Anno
    EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2009, 55 (04) : 801 - 814
  • [43] Pitfalls in Prostate Cancer Magnetic Resonance Imaging
    Yadav, Kuldeep
    Sureka, Binit
    Elhence, Poonam
    Choudhary, Gautam Ram
    Pandey, Himanshu
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL AND PAEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY, 2021, 42 (01) : 80 - 88
  • [44] Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer Screening
    Fazekas, Tamas
    Shim, Sung Ryul
    Basile, Giuseppe
    Baboudjian, Michael
    Koi, Tamas
    Przydacz, Mikolaj
    Abufaraj, Mohammad
    Ploussard, Guillaume
    Kasivisvanathan, Veeru
    Rivas, Juan Gomez
    Gandaglia, Giorgio
    Szarvas, Tibor
    Schoots, Ivo
    van den Bergh, Roderick
    Leapman, Michael
    Nyirady, Peter
    Shariat, Shahrokh
    Rajwa, Pawel
    JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2024, 10 (06) : 745 - 754
  • [45] Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy in the diagnostic pathway of prostate cancer
    Chaloupka, Michael
    Apfelbeck, Maria
    Pfitzinger, Paulo
    Bischoff, Robert
    Lellig, Ekaterina
    Rath, Lukas
    Schlenker, Boris
    Stief, Christian G.
    Clevert, Dirk-Andre
    RADIOLOGE, 2020, 60 (Suppl 1): : 63 - 69
  • [46] Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging has limited clinical ability to preoperatively predict pT3 prostate cancer
    Brajtbord, Jonathan S.
    Lavery, Hugh J.
    Nabizada-Pace, Fatima
    Senaratne, Prathibha
    Samadi, David B.
    BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2011, 107 (09) : 1419 - 1424
  • [47] Localising Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Endorectal Magnetic Resonance (MR) Imaging and 3D-MR Spectroscopic Imaging with Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Biopsy
    Gbenou, Maximilien C. Goris
    Peltier, Alexandre
    Addla, Sanjai K.
    Lemort, Marc
    Bollens, Renaud
    Larsimont, Denis
    Roumeguere, Thierry
    Schulman, Claude C.
    van Velthoven, Roland
    UROLOGIA INTERNATIONALIS, 2012, 88 (01) : 12 - 17
  • [48] Analysis of Inflammatory Features in Suspicious Lesions for Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Are They Mimickers of Prostate Cancer?
    Morote, Juan
    Celma, Ana
    Semidey, Maria E.
    Antolin, Andreu
    Miro, Berta
    Mendez, Olga
    Trilla, Enrique
    CANCERS, 2025, 17 (01)
  • [49] Predicting prostate cancer risk using magnetic resonance imaging data
    Anderson, David
    Golden, Bruce
    Wasil, Edward
    Zhang, Hao
    INFORMATION SYSTEMS AND E-BUSINESS MANAGEMENT, 2015, 13 (04) : 599 - 608
  • [50] The prognostic value, sensitivity, and specificity of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before salvage radiotherapy for prostate cancer
    Breen, William G.
    Stish, Bradley J.
    Harmsen, William S.
    Froemming, Adam T.
    Mynderse, Lance A.
    Choo, C. Richard
    Davis, Brian J.
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2021, 161 : 9 - 15