Improved Characterization of Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis by Topographic Analysis

被引:12
|
作者
Hardmeier, Martin [1 ]
Hatz, Florian [1 ]
Naegelin, Yvonne [1 ]
Hight, Darren [1 ]
Schindler, Christian [2 ]
Kappos, Ludwig [1 ]
Seeck, Margitta [3 ]
Michel, Christoph M. [4 ]
Fuhr, Peter [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Basel Hosp, Dept Neurol, CH-4031 Basel, Switzerland
[2] Swiss Trop & Publ Hlth Inst, CH-4002 Basel, Switzerland
[3] Univ Hosp Geneva, Neurol Clin, EEG & Epilepsy Unit, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
[4] Univ Geneva, Dept Basic & Clin Neurosci, CH-1211 Geneva, Switzerland
基金
瑞士国家科学基金会;
关键词
Multiple sclerosis; Visual evoked potentials; Topographic analysis; Quantification; Surrogate marker; OPTIC NEURITIS; DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; DISABILITY; BRAIN; RESPONSES; EYE; STIMULATION; ERP;
D O I
10.1007/s10548-013-0318-6
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
In multiple sclerosis (MS), the combination of visual, somatosensory and motor evoked potentials (EP) has been shown to be highly correlated with the Expanded Disability Severity Scale (EDSS) and to predict the disease course. In the present study, we explored whether the significance of the visual EP (VEP) can be improved with multichannel recordings (204 electrodes) and topographic analysis (tVEP). VEPs were analyzed in 83 MS patients (median EDSS 2.0; 52 % with history of optic neuritis; hON) and 47 healthy controls (HC). TVEP components were automatically defined on the basis of spatial similarity between the scalp potential fields (topographic maps) of single subjects' VEPs and reference maps generated from HC. Non-ambiguous measures of latency, amplitude and configuration were derived from the maps reflecting the P100 component. TVEP was compared to conventional analysis (cVEP) with respect to reliability in HC, validity using descriptors of logistic regression models, and sensitivity derived from receiver operating characteristics curves. In tVEP, reliability tended to be higher for measurement of amplitude (p = 0.06). Regression models on diagnosis (MS vs. HC) and hON were more favorable using tVEP- versus cVEP-predictors. Sensitivity was increased in tVEP versus cVEP: 72 % versus 60 % for diagnosis, and 88 % versus 77 % for hON. The advantage of tVEP was most pronounced in pathological VEPs, in which cVEPs were often ambiguous. TVEP is a reliable, valid, and sensitive method of objectively quantifying pathological VEP in particular. In combination with other EP modalities, tVEP may improve the monitoring of disease course in MS.
引用
收藏
页码:318 / 327
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Improved Characterization of Visual Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis by Topographic Analysis
    Martin Hardmeier
    Florian Hatz
    Yvonne Naegelin
    Darren Hight
    Christian Schindler
    Ludwig Kappos
    Margitta Seeck
    Christoph M. Michel
    Peter Fuhr
    Brain Topography, 2014, 27 : 318 - 327
  • [2] Increasing the Diagnostic Value of Evoked Potentials in Multiple Sclerosis by Quantitative Topographic Analysis of Multichannel Recordings
    Lascano, Agustina M.
    Brodbeck, Verena
    Lalive, Patrice H.
    Chofflon, Michel
    Seeck, Margitta
    Michel, Christoph M.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2009, 26 (05) : 316 - 325
  • [3] The usefulness of visual evoked potentials in the assessment of the pediatric multiple sclerosis
    Nikolic, Blazo
    Zaletel, Ivan
    Ivancevic, Nikola
    Rovcanin, Branislav
    Pepic, Ana
    Samardzic, Janko
    Jancic, Jasna
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2022, 36 : 130 - 136
  • [4] Visual and motor evoked potentials in the course of multiple sclerosis
    Fuhr, P
    Borggrefe-Chappuis, A
    Schindler, C
    Kappos, L
    BRAIN, 2001, 124 : 2162 - 2168
  • [5] Optical coherence tomography and visual evoked potentials: which is more sensitive in multiple sclerosis?
    Di Maggio, Giovanni
    Santangelo, Roberto
    Guerrieri, Simone
    Bianco, Mariangela
    Ferrari, Laura
    Medaglini, Stefania
    Rodegher, Mariaemma
    Colombo, Bruno
    Moiola, Lucia
    Chieffo, Raffaella
    Del Carro, Ubaldo
    Martinelli, Vittorio
    Comi, Giancarlo
    Leocani, Letizia
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2014, 20 (10) : 1342 - 1347
  • [6] Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
    Chirapapaisan, Niphon
    Laotaweerungsawat, Sawarin
    Chuenkongkaew, Wanicha
    Samsen, Patthanee
    Ruangvaravate, Ngamkae
    Thuangtong, Atiporn
    Chanvarapha, Nacha
    DOCUMENTA OPHTHALMOLOGICA, 2015, 130 (01) : 25 - 30
  • [7] Diagnostic value of visual evoked potentials for clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis
    Niphon Chirapapaisan
    Sawarin Laotaweerungsawat
    Wanicha Chuenkongkaew
    Patthanee Samsen
    Ngamkae Ruangvaravate
    Atiporn Thuangtong
    Nacha Chanvarapha
    Documenta Ophthalmologica, 2015, 130 : 25 - 30
  • [8] MRI and visual-evoked potentials in partners of multiple sclerosis patients
    Hawkes, C. H.
    Chawda, S.
    Derakshani, S.
    Muhammed, N.
    Visentin, E.
    Boniface, D.
    ACTA NEUROLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2012, 125 (06): : 424 - 430
  • [9] Assessing visual pathway function in multiple sclerosis patients with multifocal visual evoked potentials
    Laron, Michal
    Cheng, Han
    Zhang, Bin
    Schiffman, Jade S.
    Tang, Rosa A.
    Frishman, Laura J.
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS JOURNAL, 2009, 15 (12) : 1431 - 1441
  • [10] Prognostic Role of Visual Evoked Potentials in Non-Neuritic Eyes at Multiple Sclerosis Diagnosis
    Vecchio, Domizia
    Barbero, Paolo
    Galli, Giulia
    Virgilio, Eleonora
    Naldi, Paola
    Comi, Cristoforo
    Cantello, Roberto
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2023, 12 (06)