Responsiveness of outcome measurements in rehabilitation of patients with posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy

被引:38
作者
Mens, JMA
Vleeming, A
Snijders, CJ
Ronchetti, I
Ginai, AZ
Stam, HJ
机构
[1] Spine & Joint Ctr, NL-3016 CK Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Erasmus Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Inst Biomed Phys & Technol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Erasmus Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Rehabil Med, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[4] Erasmus Univ, Fac Med & Hlth Sci, Dept Radiol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
关键词
diagnostic tests; low back pain; outcome measure; pregnancy; sacroiliac joint;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-200205150-00019
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. A cohort study was conducted. Objective. To develop a test battery for evaluating the course. of, posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. Summary of Background Data. Properly validated scales to evaluate the course of posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy are scarce. Moreover, the use of many tests would be too strenuous for the patient and has an unfavorable cost-benefit ratio. Methods. The ability of 48 effect measures to detect clinically relevant changes over time (responsiveness) was tested in patients with posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. In this test, 35 measures were evaluated in a A-roup of 44 patients, and 16 measures in a group of 56 patients (three measures were evaluated in both groups). All the tests were performed at baseline and after 8 weeks treatment. A global impression of improvement (improved or not improved) scored by the patient was used standard for assessing the course of the disease. Responsiveness was examined by calculating the standardized response mean of the improved patients and by using a two-tailed Mann-Whitney nonparametric test to compare the patients who had improved and those who not improved. Results. Of the 48 effect measures, 26 measures of five categories (activities of daily living, pain, hip muscle strength, spine mobility, and spine muscle strength) ;showed good correlation with the patient's global impression of improvement. The measures in the "mobility of e pelvic joints" category were insufficient for assessing clinical change in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. The measures in the "fatigue" and "pain provocation tests" categories correlated only moderately with clinical change. Conclusions. It seems possible to gain appropriate inion about the course of posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy with a small test battery. The usefulness of the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale, the hip adduction strength assessment, and the active straight-leg-raise test prove by the current study. The value of 23 other instruments was substantiated, but further studies are needed to confirm their usefulness. The correlation of 22 evaluated measures with the patient's global improvement was too weak for them to be recommended as measures of clinical changes overtime in posterior pelvic pain since pregnancy. It is recommended that clinicians.
引用
收藏
页码:1110 / 1115
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
BERG G, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V71, P71
[2]   CLINICAL SACROILIAC TESTS IN ANKYLOSING-SPONDYLITIS AND OTHER CAUSES OF LOW-BACK-PAIN - 2 STUDIES [J].
BLOWER, PW ;
GRIFFIN, AJ .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1984, 43 (02) :192-195
[3]   WHICH OUTCOME MEASURES SHOULD BE USED IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS CLINICAL-TRIALS - CLINICAL AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES RESPONSIVENESS TO TREATMENT IN A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL [J].
BUCHBINDER, R ;
BOMBARDIER, C ;
YEUNG, M ;
TUGWELL, P .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1995, 38 (11) :1568-1580
[4]  
Chamberlain WE, 1930, AM J ROENTGENOL RADI, V24, P621
[5]  
Cohen J., 1998, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, V2nd
[6]   Outcome measures for low back pain research - A proposal for standardized use [J].
Deyo, RA ;
Battie, M ;
Beurskens, AJHM ;
Bombardier, C ;
Croft, P ;
Koes, B ;
Malmivaara, A ;
Roland, M ;
Von Korff, M ;
Waddell, G .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (18) :2003-2013
[7]   THE DUTCH VERSION OF THE NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE - INVESTIGATIONS OF PSYCHOMETRIC ASPECTS [J].
ERDMAN, RAM ;
PASSCHIER, J ;
KOOIJMAN, M ;
STRONKS, DL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1993, 72 (03) :1027-1035
[8]   LOW-BACK-PAIN IN PREGNANCY [J].
FAST, A ;
SHAPIRO, D ;
DUCOMMUN, EJ ;
FRIEDMANN, LW ;
BOUKLAS, T ;
FLOMAN, Y .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (04) :368-371
[9]   THE QUEBEC BACK PAIN DISABILITY SCALE - MEASUREMENT PROPERTIES [J].
KOPEC, JA ;
ESDAILE, JM ;
ABRAHAMOWICZ, M ;
ABENHAIM, L ;
WOODDAUPHINEE, S ;
LAMPING, DL ;
WILLIAMS, JI .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (03) :341-352
[10]   Discriminatory power of tests applied in back pain during pregnancy [J].
Kristiansson, P ;
Svardsudd, K .
SPINE, 1996, 21 (20) :2337-2343