A review of multi-criteria optimization techniques for agricultural land use allocation

被引:110
|
作者
Kaim, Andrea [1 ]
Cord, Anna F. [1 ]
Volk, Martin [1 ]
机构
[1] UFZ Helmholtz Ctr Environm Res, Dept Computat Landscape Ecol, Permoserstr 15, D-04318 Leipzig, Germany
关键词
Agricultural land use allocation; Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Multi-criteria optimization; Stakeholder integration; Trade-off analysis; Constraint handling; TRADE-OFF ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; GENETIC ALGORITHM; DIFFERENTIAL EVOLUTION; DECISION-SUPPORT; BIODIVERSITY; CONSERVATION; MANAGEMENT; FRAMEWORK;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.031
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Optimal land use allocation with the intention of ecosystem services provision and biodiversity conservation is one of the key challenges in agricultural management. Optimization techniques have been especially prevalent for solving land use problems; however, there is no guideline supporting the selection of an appropriate method. To enhance the applicability of optimization techniques for real-world case studies, this study provides an overview of optimization methods used for targeting land use decisions in agricultural areas. We explore their relative abilities for the integration of stakeholders and the identification of ecosystem service trade-offs since these are especially pertinent to land use planners. Finally, we provide recommendations for the use of the different optimization methods. For example, scalarization methods (e.g., reference point methods, tabu search) are particularly useful for a priori or interactive stakeholder integration; whereas Pareto-based approaches (e.g., evolutionary algorithms) are appropriate for trade-off analyses and a posteriori stakeholder involvement. (C) 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:79 / 93
页数:15
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Multi-criteria optimization in regression
    Mike G. Tsionas
    Annals of Operations Research, 2021, 306 : 7 - 25
  • [22] Multi-criteria optimization in industry
    Karl-Heinz Küfer
    Kaisa Miettinen
    Stefan Ruzika
    Serpil Sayin
    OR Spectrum, 2022, 44 : 303 - 305
  • [23] A MULTI-CRITERIA OPTIMIZATION PROPOSAL FOR AID ALLOCATION: COMBINING DONOR AND RECIPIENT INTERESTS
    Munoz-Ocana, Yolanda
    Torres-Jimenez, Mercedes
    Carbonero-Ruz, Mariano
    Pacheco-Martinez, Ana M.
    REVISTA DE ECONOMIA MUNDIAL, 2022, (62): : 151 - 170
  • [24] Models of Multi-criteria Optimization with Quality Criteria
    Rozen, V. V.
    Smirnova, D. S.
    IZVESTIYA SARATOVSKOGO UNIVERSITETA NOVAYA SERIYA-MATEMATIKA MEKHANIKA INFORMATIKA, 2013, 13 (02): : 8 - 8
  • [25] Comparing multi-criteria evaluation and participatory mapping to projecting land use
    Rohrbach, Beni
    Laube, Patrick
    Weibel, Robert
    LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2018, 176 : 38 - 50
  • [26] A multi-criteria model for land valuation in the land consolidation
    Tezcan, Ahmet
    Buyuktas, Kenan
    Aslan, Serife Tulin Akkaya
    LAND USE POLICY, 2020, 95
  • [27] Metaheuristics for agricultural land use optimization. A review
    Mohamed-Mahmoud Memmah
    Françoise Lescourret
    Xin Yao
    Claire Lavigne
    Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2015, 35 : 975 - 998
  • [28] Metaheuristics for agricultural land use optimization. A review
    Memmah, Mohamed-Mahmoud
    Lescourret, Francoise
    Yao, Xin
    Lavigne, Claire
    AGRONOMY FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, 2015, 35 (03) : 975 - 998
  • [29] Comparison of multi-criteria scheduling techniques
    Klusacek, Dalibor
    Rudova, Hana
    Baraglia, Ranieri
    Pasquali, Marco
    Capannini, Gabriele
    GRID COMPUTING: ACHIEVEMENTS AND PROSPECTS, 2008, : 173 - +
  • [30] Software packages for multi-criteria resource allocation
    Lourenco, Joao Carlos
    Bana E Costa, Carlos A.
    Morton, Alec
    IEMC - EUROPE 2008: INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE, EUROPE, CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: MANAGING ENGINEERING, TECHNOLOGY AND INNOVATION FOR GROWTH, 2008, : 93 - 98