Towards clinical trials of lie detection with fMRI

被引:12
作者
Hakun, J. G. [1 ]
Ruparel, K. [1 ]
Seelig, D. [1 ]
Busch, E. [1 ]
Loughead, J. W. [1 ]
Gur, R. C. [1 ]
Langleben, D. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Treatment Res Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
关键词
BRAIN ACTIVITY; DECEPTION; CONFLICT;
D O I
10.1080/17470910802188370
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Recent reports of successful fMRI-based discrimination between lie and truth in single subjects raised the interest of prospective users and a public concern about the potential scope of this technology. The increased scrutiny highlighted the lack of controlled oreal lifeo, i.e. prospective clinical trials of this technology that conform to the common standards of medical device development. The ethics of conducting such trials given the paucity of data on fMRI-based lie detection has also been questioned. To probe the potential issues of translating the laboratory research into practice, we conducted a case study in which we adapted the standard Guilty Knowledge Test (GKT), a well-established model of producing deception, to the common scenario of lying on a resume. The task consisted of questions about pertinent items on the subject's resume, three of which could be independently verified as truth (KNOWN) and three that could not be verified and were thus termed UNKNOWN. The subject had an incentive to lie on all UNKNOWN items, and on debriefing confirmed that he had done so. Data was preprocessed, masked with a priori regions of interest, thresholded, and qualitatively evaluated for consistency with the previously reported prefronto-parietal Lie Truth pattern. Deceptive responses to two out of the three UNKNOWN items were associated with the predicted prefronto-parietal fMRI pattern. In the third UNKNOWN this pattern was absent, and instead, increased limbic (amygdala and hippocampus) response was observed. Based on published prefronto-parietal Lie response pattern, only the first two items could be categorized as Lie. If confirmed, this demonstration of amygdala and hippocampus activation in a Lie Truth contrast illustrates the need to integrate the limbic system and its emotional and cognitive correlates into the existing model of deception. Our experiment suggests an approach to a naturalistic scenario and the research questions that need to be answered in order to set the stage for prospective clinical trials of fMRI-based lie detection.
引用
收藏
页码:518 / 527
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [21] Henig Robin Marantz, 2006, N Y Times Mag, P47
  • [22] Detecting deception using functional magnetic resonance imaging
    Kozel, FA
    Johnson, KA
    Mu, QW
    Grenesko, EL
    Laken, SJ
    George, MS
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2005, 58 (08) : 605 - 613
  • [23] A pilot study of functional magnetic resonance imaging brain correlates of deception in healthy young men
    Kozel, FA
    Revell, LJ
    Lorberbaum, JP
    Shastri, A
    Elhai, JD
    Horner, MD
    Smith, A
    Nahas, Z
    Bohning, DE
    George, MS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHIATRY AND CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCES, 2004, 16 (03) : 295 - 305
  • [24] KOZEL FA, 2008, NEUROSCIENCE CRIME S
  • [25] Langleben D., 2006, The Journal of Psychiatry Law, V34, P351
  • [26] Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI
    Langleben, DD
    Loughead, JW
    Bilker, WB
    Ruparel, K
    Childress, AR
    Busch, SI
    Gur, RC
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2005, 26 (04) : 262 - 272
  • [27] Brain activity during simulated deception: An event-related functional magnetic resonance study
    Langleben, DD
    Schroeder, L
    Maldjian, JA
    Gur, RC
    McDonald, S
    Ragland, JD
    O'Brien, CP
    Childress, AR
    [J]. NEUROIMAGE, 2002, 15 (03) : 727 - 732
  • [28] Lie detection by functional magnetic resonance imaging
    Lee, TMC
    Liu, HL
    Tan, LH
    Chan, CCH
    Mahankali, S
    Feng, CM
    Hou, JW
    Fox, PT
    Gao, JH
    [J]. HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2002, 15 (03) : 157 - 164
  • [29] The effect of memory load on cortical activity in the spatial working memory circuit
    Leung H.-C.
    Seelig D.
    Gore J.C.
    [J]. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 2004, 4 (4) : 553 - 563
  • [30] LEWIN T, 2007, NY TIMES 0426